Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
C7No disposition in the minutesConsent agendaPublished agenda

Accept Multi-Use Trail Easement Agreement – 3KS Family, LLLP – Orange Belt Trail – No Funding Required

Internal Services - Facilities ManagementFAC-23-0154District 2

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

No disposition in the minutes

The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 20, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 20, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

FAC-23-0154 in full →

FAC-23-0154 was taken up 2 times between May 9, 2023 and Jun 20, 2023 — this is appearance 2.

  1. May 9, 2023BoardC15No disposition in the minutes
  2. Jun 20, 2023BoardC7No disposition in the minutesthis item

No appearance of this case has a final disposition in the minutes. It was continued, or the minutes do not dispose of it in writing — which is true for 24% of items.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 8m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 77% of 64 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
MarianoChair

Great, great, uh great program. Okay, now is it time for the consent agenda. Um I have a few polls in the consent agenda. C six, C fifteen, C twenty-nine, and C seven. Are there any other polls in the consent agenda? C six, seven, fifteen, and which ones, Chairman? Six, seven, fifteen, and twenty-nine. Okay.

Starkey

Got mine, C seven? Yes.

OakleyVice Chair

I move approval on the rest of the consent items. Okay, we have a second. Yeah, roll call vote.

Starkey

District One, Commissioner Oakley.

MarianoChair

Aye.

Starkey

District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Aye. District five, Chairman Mariano.

MarianoChair

Aye. Now I do have a note on C six it was gonna be a public hearing item. C six to be moved to the afternoon. C six will be moved to the afternoon. So go to C seven, Commissioner Starkey.

Starkey

Um so this is uh the um movement for the orange belt trail. Um and I'm assuming this is the one that we worked on for at Pasco or Central Pasco Employment Center. Is that correct?

Geek or Tina or anybody?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

This is on Mr. Southworth's

Starkey

property. Yeah, okay. See there's no one here that knows about And um

Uh there's a couple things on there. One it talks about a bobwire fence. Um if there are no cattle on the northern piece, do we still have to put a bobwire fence or does this say only If They're our count.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Hey, good morning ma'am. Doug Anderson, Assistant Director of Facilities Management. Uh based on the information that I saw going back and forth between um for the MPUD and devo uh future development and also engineering there will be live cattle that uh that's requiring us to have the barbed wire fence or barbed wire on the fence. Uh there were two options presented. Uh F dot F dot type type A and type B fencing. Um

I have some. I have some pictures right here what what the difference is.

Starkey

Do I have to

Unidentified speakerVoice B

show 'em can you show 'em in the Elm Right?

Starkey

Um but my question is if there are no cattle, do we still have to have that fence? Because that's the Amazon site and

Unidentified speakerVoice B

the answer would be no. If there's no if there's no we're not trying to keep any livestock, then you would not have be required to have the barbell.

Starkey

So we don't have to have a fence between the property and the trail?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

No. Okay. What he said was you didn't have to have a barbed wire. I vi I read this to say you have to have a fence.

Starkey

Well that that's not a good idea to have a fence, keeping the public from the trail. So I'd I'd like to Talk about that.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

I think the idea is to keep the public from this property. Not keeping the public from the Well that's

Starkey

how some people may get to work. I mean w we n you never put a I've never seen a f There's no reason to put a fence there. If it's not I understand for cattle But

This is not a private um gated area. So it's just about place of employment while people work. So I I'd like to make sure we're discussing with the property owner that we don't need a fence if there isn't cattle.

OakleyVice Chair

Commissioner Oakley. I I gotta ask a question. Uh how come Well that's a class you're saying the fence is covering a roadway, the a public roadway?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

It's just m it's marking off the right away or easement between the Uh cattle uh cattle herders property and the area where the trail will be going. So it's just to make sure that the cattle do not roam into traffic in other areas.

Starkey

And we have to ha you have to have that. You don't want cattle going across the trail.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Right.

Starkey

But When that land gets developed, there's no reason to have that fence.

OakleyVice Chair

Well the cattle won't be there either.

Starkey

Exactly. So I just want to make sure in this agreement that there doesn't have to be that fence once there is no cattle. Is or are the bottom of the property. The second thing is this if that if Just to make sure everyone remembers this. Uh 'cause I was on the state rainways and trails council when we when the state passed this. Any Land that is owned by uh a private citizen that has a trail going through it, if

it's open to the public, the state will take on the liability. So it's there's no reason for us to take on that liability. If we don't if so just want to make sure Mr. Administrator, that you know that that law exists in state statute.

Aaron Churchman

Chairman

OakleyVice Chair

Commission Weightman. Thank you, sir. Um Yeah good Good point on liability, Commissioner Starkey. I just want to make sure that

the private landowner, you know, obviously people can if there's if if if the general public they'll folks wander, right? So I worry about the liability and the liability coverage that the private landowner would have to have. And that's just an additional cost to that private landowner. So Agreeing with Commissioner Starkey. Let's make sure that we limit the liability to the private landowner that's gonna be, you know Sharing this this space together. So that's just my concern uh with it. Yeah

Starkey

and to and to expand on that uh lia liability coverage, it's not just on the trail, it covers the whole boundary of the contiguous property that private landowner owns.

OakleyVice Chair

Is there a cap? On the There's a lot of acreage there. So it'll cover those that whole a hundred.

Starkey

It'll cover Mr. S if Mr. Southward is letting the public use that piece Um Which I'm surprised it's an easement. I thought we were getting that as a donation. Um but Uh if Whatever Mr. Southward's property lines are If there's a trail, public trail going through his property, he is covered under all his property.

OakleyVice Chair

Yeah. Commissioner Weightman. Thank you. Thank you, Chairman Mariano. in my neck of the woods. Let's let's confirm what Commissioner Starkey is stating and let's reach out to the property owner and the right-of-way. and and let them know and that way everybody's everybody's covered and try to limit the expense and exposure to to the the the neighboring landowner, please.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Well the property owner is the The way this agreement is written, the property owner is indemnified by The county commission.

Starkey

Yeah. But I'm saying the county doesn't have to take that on. Just to make you aware that the state will take that on.

MarianoChair

Shall we continue this item to the next meeting? I would I

Unidentified speakerVoice A

would recommend it.

MarianoChair

Okay. Uh

Starkey

Mr. Chair, I'll need to get a copy of that image for the record. Okay. So if staff just wants to give it uh to my team that would be fine.

MarianoChair

Can we get a m go on a motion? Um move

Starkey

to continue. No,

MarianoChair

we'll just withdraw the move to receive and file the paper, please. We'll actually file the paper that was just submitted. I'll I'll go ahead and just withdraw. She made the motion on a second withdrawal. Okay. All right, C six is gone.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

You may want to take a vote on the receive and file so that it's part of the record.

Starkey

Thank you.

MarianoChair

Yep,

Starkey

and you have a second.

MarianoChair

Motion, second, all in favor? Aye. Roll call.

Starkey

District one, Commissioner Oakley.

MarianoChair

Aye.

Starkey

District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Oh

Unidentified speakerVoice C

my my mic. All right.

Starkey

District five, Chairman

Starkey

Mariano. So my my mic was not on. Were you able to record what I was saying? Okay, it's on.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Okay, C

MarianoChair

C fifteen Ben Hager.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

C fifteen, we're pulling that agenda item and moving it to a to uh the next board meeting

MarianoChair

okay and c twenty nine is withdrawn as well Yeah. That'll take care of the consent agenda.

Starkey

It's a small one today.