An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan: Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2- 15 And Sheet 12) From IL (Industrial Light) To COM (Commercial) On Approximately 3.69 Acres Of Real Property Located At The Intersection North Of Sunlake Boulevard Extension And SR-52.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
OutcomeAdopted
Approved to adopt by roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 10, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 10, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-24-0008 in full →Heard once. PDD-24-0008 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Oct 10, 2023BoardP76▶Adoptedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 82% of 28 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Aye. Motion passes. Item P seventy-six.
P seventy six was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on August 27, 2023, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Okay, thank you. Item P76 is PDD twenty-four zero zero zero eight. It's an ordinance amending to the Pasco County comprehensive plan, providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two-15 and uh sheet twelve from IEL Industrial Light to Com commercial on approximately 3.69 acres of real property located at the intersection north of Sunlake Boulevard Extension and State Route 52. This comes to you with a recommendation to adopt the small scale campaign
plan and then
Okay. The staff uh anyone from commission wanted a presentation?
Okay.
Commissioner
Thank you, Chairman Mariano. Mr. Peter, I was reading through the background. I just want to confirm this is uh it's a little bit small for Live Local, but we we have the D descriptions on there. And this property based on the conversations we had earlier today on design of the property drops and our washes and of course facilities that that uh
Uh in terms of the frontage it would go to uh we would be adding land to the COM commercial area, um, but we would have to develop the land development code amendments and the board would have to approve them and pass them by ordinance, and then those would be applicable to any future development that would occur uh on this site.
Um, I have a question. Mr. Starkey. We just um outlined the types of layout that we'd like to see. Can did that affect this at all?
That's the question he just answered.
Oh, for
Commissioner Weightman.
I was reading there.
Um you need to adopt you need to adopt the Land Development Code amendments that staff will be proposing if they're adopted before this property comes in for development, it would apply to them. Otherwise it would not.
Okay, so we can't condition it.
This is a comprehensive plan, this is not rezoning.
Okay. We have to educate us everyone.
Okay.
That's why we're not land use attorneys and making the biggest bucks.
Any other questions for staff? Anyone from the public like to speak to item P seventy six?
There was no one signed up.
No one signed up, no one on WebEx?
Correct.
All right, back to the board. We'll close public comment. To the board. Second.
District one Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Weightman.
District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
Aye. District 5, Chairman Mariano.