An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 23) From RES-9 (Residential - 9 Du/Ga) To COM (Commercial) On Approximately 4.84 Acres Of Real Property Located West Of

9:32Uh yes, sir. Uh item thirty seven was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times November twenty-second, twenty twenty three.

9:40Okay. Mr. Chairman Mariano Spitos, Planning and Economic Growth. Pull

9:45that mic to you a little bit, Terry, because we it's hard to hear

9:47you for some reason. Uh item P37 is PDD 24001. It's an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, Map 2-15 and Shi23 from RES 9 to COM Commercial on approximately 4.84 acres of real property located west of State Road 39 at the southwest intersection of Chan, southwest corner of the intersection of Chan Sea. Road and State Road thirty nine, Paul S. Buckman Highway, and providing for additional

10:17text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer serverability and an effective date. This comes to you with recommendation of approval of the comprehensive plan amendment. We can do a presentation if one is desired.

10:32Okay.

10:37So is there um Is there an applicant for this one? There's an applicant here on this one? Oh, okay. Would you like to speak? Yeah.

10:50Uh good afternoon. Uh for the record, my name is Patricia Ortiz. Would you like my address?

10:56Yes.

10:57Yes. 2810 North Central Avenue, Tampa, 33602. This petition seeks to uh resolve a conflict zoning. The current land use is Res 9. Um the zoning is commercial one. We're seeking a uh small-scale comprehensive map amendment uh to the COM future land use designation. This subject property is located as stated at the southwest corner of Chauncey Road and

11:27State Road 39. It is within the Zephyrhills Industrial Corridor. And I can answer any questions that you might have. Yeah. You'd like

11:39me to go

11:39on

11:39to the

11:39right-of-way.

11:42All right. Mr. Whiteman?

11:45Thanks for chairing. Uh it it it's four acres is it. Is it tied into a larger commercial parcel?

11:55I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand your question. The the parcel is four point Yes.

12:02This parcel is four four acres, but is there on a dickery is it tied into an even larger footprint? I my question is related to live locals, so

12:12I

12:12want to make sure that this if there's a larger footprint than the four the four acres that uh we protect this property for job creating opportunities.

12:23Right, it is not tied in with a larger parcel and um during the beginning of this process staff asked us if we would be um in agreement uh regarding a condition to not take advantage of the live local Uh statute and to that we agreed.

12:43Okay.

12:45Okay. Thank you.

12:47So but this is this four point eight eight four acres is by itself is that's the only piece in this corner.

12:55It appears that they've got residential to the south.

12:57There's residential next to it, I

12:59know. And then and to the

13:02and to the west.

13:03To the west and then Chauncey and uh Buckman are the other

13:07two sides.

13:08So It's isolated.

13:10Yeah, I know the corner, but it's it's a standalone commercial piece on that corner.

13:14Yes, sir.

13:15Okay. So do we have anyone signed up for this item?

13:20We do not.

13:21No one signed up. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item?

13:29Seeing no one, uh pleasure board, move rule.

13:33Second.

13:34Got a motion of second by roll call vote.

13:37District two Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.

13:45Aye.

13:45District one, Chairman Oakley.

13:47Aye. Motion pass five zero.

13:49Thank you so much.

13:50Move on to uh B thirty eight.