Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Tibbetts Land at Gowers Corner MPUD – Tibbetts Land LLC - A Rezoning Request from MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to MPUD to Allow for 300,000 Square Feet of Retail and Office and Up to 400 Multi-Family Apartments on Approximately 48.98 Acres Located at the Southwest Corner of the Intersection of State Road 52 (SR-52) and US Hwy 41
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
DispositionApproved
Approved Staff’s recommendation with the noted Conditions stated by Ms. Barbara Wilhite, the attorney, which included revised MPUD Condition 35, land use maximum shall be in accordance with the following permitted uses and development limits table as shown in table one below, the applicant developer may exchange multi-family apartment entitlements for additional commercial, retail, and/or office e
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 20, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 20, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PEG-24-7699 in full →Heard once. PEG-24-7699 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Feb 20, 2024BoardP51▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 54% of 28 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Pifty one.
Uh P fifty one.
This is Clark Hobby. Uh Commissioner, were you pulling it just to add the extra square footage or to the
to take it from three hundred thousand square footage extra up to five hundred thousand?
The applicant has no objection, but I would ask the board, I'm not sure that the previous motion on the comp plan amendment included that I know we discussed it, but I'm not sure that the motion for P forty three included that as well. So if we could just clarify that.
You've got an additional problem, Clark. You advertised for 300,000. So So you'd have to readvertise the project to get the extra two hundred thousand.
On both
of them? Well on the rezoning.
Okay. Well then we'll just have to stick with the three hundred thousand, but at least we can come back later on.
Okay.
Well with with that in mind, Commissioner, if if you have no other objection, if you could make a motion, that would be great.
Okay. Both approval. Okay. D fifty one. Second. And I got a motion and a second by roll call vote.
District 2, Commissioner Weightman. District 3, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District 4, Commissioner Bradford.
Yes.
Yeah, I apologize. Um for item P51, uh, there's an there's X party communications that have already been provided to the clerk's office. Um from Commissioner Oakley, Commissioner Weightman. And uh Commissioner Starkey and Commissioner Mariano on item P fifty one.
You're just making notes. Yeah, if you'd move and receive and file or or
We've already sent them to the clerk's office. Thank you. Okay. Okay. We already have them.
All right.
So we're at uh B fifty two now? And I believe you've got the same issue with B fifty two.
That's correct. That's why I'm stay I'm standing by.
Yeah, we're only halfway through the vote.
Yeah,
we're halfway through the vote on B fi.
So I think Commissioner Starkey, d can you confirm you just said aye? I did say
aye.
Okay. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Aye.
District One Chairman Oakley.