Zoning Amendment (Consent) – The Corwyn at Wesley Hills MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Stanley Hilton – A Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Maximum Development of 350 Multi-Family Units, 15,000 Square- Feet of Commercial/Retail/Office on Approximately 24.42 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 20, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 20, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PEG-24-7719 in full →Heard once. PEG-24-7719 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Feb 20, 2024BoardP52▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 86% of 50 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
I motion pass 5-0. Move to P 52. And We'll um we'll hear from you first. Yes, of
course. And I'm just gonna state the item time the item number for the record, PEG 247719. And that's a zoning amendment, the Corwin at Wesley Hills MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Stanley Hilton. Um yes, on this item uh P52, there are expert take communications from Commissioner Starkey, Commissioner Mariano, and Commissioner Weightman. Get out.
All right.
So sir, we and we skipped this one earlier. We didn't do the proof, so um I'm gonna for the record, it was advertised in Tampa Bay Times January third, twenty twenty four, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings. This is
on fifty two.
This is on fifty two, yeah. We had already done fifty-one, but
Okay. All right. And then uh
Is anyone well no one's here to speak against we pulled it? So pleasure of the board.
Um
so you've got you've got um Okay. Disclosures that need
to be in the
right-of-way.
And those were provided to the clerk's office as well. Correct. Yeah.
Fifty two.
Fifty two. Yeah, that's
one of the
all right.
I thought that's what she was just doing. Okay. Yeah.
Yeah. Um
Barbara, you probably want to come up on this. So
Yeah, on this one as I understand that there's gonna be a loom from allowing to convert multifamily to commercial and multifamily to office.
I did draft language. I don't know if Dave can look at it real quick and we could delay this and you could hear a couple more items and we could work out the Barbara, can you just introduce yourself for this item?
So we can either delay a couple items so we can get the language exact or we can kinda just make the condition and then we can work out the language with staff.
Mr. Chairman Mariano. Yes. So what I what I like to do as far as given an option, I I don't want to see a conversion from multi multifamily to I mean from retail to multifamily, but I don't mind going the other way.
Right. Says the applicant development exchange multifamily apartment entitlements for additional commercial, retail, and/or office entitlements.
And on this one, I don't think there's as as much of an advertising issue because you're taking existing entitlements and m moving them over where with Clark's you were just adding square footage that didn't That the public wasn't aware of.
Yeah, this would be trip neutral with our language.
So why is it? Mr. Chair, I've I've reviewed Barbara's language, I think it's fine. Okay. I mean normally we do include attach the loom, but she's doing it based on IT, which I think is fine. Okay. Thanks, sir.
Want me to read it in real quick?
You
can't. Sure. This is revised MPD condition thirty-five. Land use maximum shall be in accordance with the following permitted uses and development limits table as shown in table one below. The applicant developer may exchange multifamily apartment entitlements for additional commercial, retail, and or office entitlements. The exchange rate shall be based upon the trip generation rate of the land use or most similar land use in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual ITE. Land use exchange request shall be submitted to PDD for verification as to implementation
in accordance with this condition and administrative approval. And table one remains the same.
Yeah. And the last thing we need is to make sure we're gonna be able to do that. Barbara. And the last thing we need to add in is you're gonna stick to the Plan that's been kind of submitted.
Those already are in there? Um we already
bound?
We already bound, yep, to it.
All right, so move approval P fifty two.
It's public public meetings. Anyone wish to speak? To this item. In the audience?
There's no one signed up.
No one signed up?
Yes, sir.
Move
approval with the noted conditions just stated by the accounty uh by the Barbara Will Hight, the attorney.
Second.
Starkey second.
Okay. Uh by roll call vote.
District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District one, Chairman Oakley.
Aye. Motion
passed five zero.