An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2- 15 And Sheet 06) From AG (Agricultural) To AG/R (Agricultural/Rural) On Approximately 92.6 Acres Of Real Property Located At The Northwest Corner Of The Intersection Of Bellamy Brothers Boulevard And Johnston Road; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing for A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionAdopted
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 4, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 4, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PEG-24-0124 in full →PEG-24-0124 was taken up 2 times between Apr 10, 2024 and Jun 4, 2024 — this is appearance 2.
- Apr 10, 2024BoardP54▶Approved
- Jun 4, 2024BoardP46▶Adoptedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 7m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 98% of 40 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Second motion. Motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Motion passed 5-0. Go to P forty six.
Item P 46 was published in the Tampa Bay Times on February 21, 2024 and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Item P46 is PEG 240124. This is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use Map 2-15 and Sheet O6 from AG Agricultural to AGR Agricultural Rural on approximately 92.6 acres of real property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Bellamy Brothers Boulevard and Johnston Road. And providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repeated observability and an effective date.
This comes to you with a recommendation of approval by Will Clobo. If with there's a presentation, if so desired. Okay,
this is a public meeting. Um Has anyone signed up to speak to this item?
No one is signed up for this item.
Uh I recognize uh
As Icewood. Come forward?
State your name and address for the record.
No. Nancy Hazel [address removed]. Um so I I read through all this and I I had heard some concerns about but I wasn't sure what I should be concerned about. The only thing I saw was maybe it was gonna be higher densities than one per five per acre. So I just wanted
that it cannot be any denser than one unit perfect for five acres. Thank y'all.
All right. Thank you. Anyone else wish to speak this item? Yes, ma'am? Thank
you, Mr.
Chairman Mariano.
I'm the applicant. I represent the applicant. Cindy Terrapani. The address is 128 East Tarpon Avenue in Tarpon Springs, Florida. Represent the applicant. This is your adoption hearing on this plan amendment. Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve it. Um you are recommended and unanimously to approve it to transmit it. We had no comments back from any of the state agencies. Um and I just confirm uh Ladies comment the request is for a plan category that the maximum density is one unit for five acres. Each lot must
be a minimum of five. We're currently at ten, so we're asking to go from ten a ten-acre lot to a five-acre lot. The difference is nine units altogether. It's a very minimus de minimis change. We will, upon approval of this, if we are approved today, we will start through the rezoning. process um to confirm that it will be a five acre zoning lot and then of course subdivide as we go forward. Happy to answer any questions you might have. I I have one question. I don't recall what the plan is for Bellamy if there's a multi-use path
going up the side of it, but is there a reservation on this? Um we have there is a right-of-way reservation on the on well on both sides and we uh we're aware of that. I don't I don't remember that there's a pat I don't believe there's a path on Bellamy. I think the path is down on State Route 52, but I would refer defer to the staff. Well they're gonna be in
the road then.
Let me ask to to
The the nearest trail is five point seven miles south of this site at fifty two. So the i a trail does not go up uh Bellamy Brothers Board. It doesn't go up on Bellway.
But there i there is one south of it. Yeah, right there.
Yes. South of it.
Yeah, just so if th if whoever moves in there wants to get to the trail, they're gonna be in the road.
Yes, there are those they'll probably be roll their shoulder and
that's not always the best plan. Mm-hmm. Just saying.
Yeah. Mr. Chairman Mariano. Well Terry's up, Terry? Down to the south at Lenar, where fifty-two in Bellamy hit, we have a we have a trailer or path along the frontage of that road.
Yes. On the north side at fifty two, F dot installed a multi use path, I believe.
I mean it comes up Bellamy to fifty two f from the s where the Orange Belt Trail is coming along. It's going north. I was pretty sure it was going north on Bellamy at least two fifty two. Um I mean it's gotta go up. I I don't think that's right. I think it goes up and then crosses through the project that Heinz is doing, so
I
was
just gonna add one thing again, Cindy Terrapani, for the applicant. Um there's no plans even in the LRTP to expand Bellamy belong beyond its two lane uh c uh situation today. So with the right of way that's being donated by this property and the right of way that is there, if you elected to to do a trail, it seems to me there would be enough right away to put it in I mean enough right away to put a trail in your right of way that you're getting from this applicant. So Are we when are we hiring that
this trail person that will know these answers to these questions, Mike?
The the uh um the advertisement is active right now. We've gone through uh one round of candidates and had to go back out in search of a candidate again. So it's an active application that we're looking for active transportation planners. Um At Bellamy Brothers, the pedestrian infrastructure that's moving north from 52 tend is sidewalks that are associated with development that's taking that will take place in the area. Um a pat the a multi-use path crosses
52 north to south at Old Pasco Road, just to the east of here, of Bellamy and 52, that is. Uh keep in mind that this particular site is five miles, almost six miles north of the nearest party. And that this is on the borders of the rural area, between the rural transition area and northeast rural.
All right.
Yeah, that road's never planned to be a four lane road, so it's hopefully we get good improvements on balancing that we do need in that area. So okay.
Mr. Chairman Mariano for public comment since sort of been destroyed.
Does anyone else in the audience wish to speak to this item? Seeing no one move approval.
Mr. Chair, there's no one on WebEx for this item.
Okay. I've got a motion. Second. And a second. Roll call vote.