Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P61ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Zoning Amendment (Consent) – S A Development Partners LLC – Change in Zoning from a C-2 General Commercial District and C-3 Commercial/Light Manufacturing District to a C-3 Commercial/Light Manufacturing District – Central Pasco County – South Side of County Road 52, Approximately 0.5 Mile West of Mirada Boulevard – Containing Approximately 5.557 Acres

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PEG-24-7803District 1

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P60 and P61.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 6, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 6, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PEG-24-7803 in full →

Heard once. PEG-24-7803 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Aug 6, 2024BoardP61Approvedthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 11 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Ron OakleyChair

Seeing no one, we move on leave it on consent and move to P61.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Approved for publication in Tampa Bay Times, June 26, 2024.

Denise

Item P sixty one is PG twenty four seven eight zero three. This is a zoning amendment under SA Development Partners LLC for change in zoning from a C2 General Commercial District and C three commercial light manufacturing district with specific use to a C three commercial light manufacturing district. Um the applicant has agreed to record uh voluntarily agreed upon deed restrictions that request that require a stub out to the west, sidewalk connection to the north, and those deed restrictions that are um specific to

the Lib Local Act. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Economic Growth Department and the Planning Commission.

Ron OakleyChair

Okay. So anyone here speak against this out.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Um

Ron OakleyChair

Against.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

No. But I have a I wanna make a comment on the one that was before. I don't need to pull it, but I wanna make a comment. The

Ron OakleyChair

one before?

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

But you finish this one and then I'll come back to you.

Ron OakleyChair

Is anyone here to speak to this item? Seeing no one, it remains on consent.