Development Agreement (Consent) - Depue East MPUD Master Planned Unit Development - Pulte Home Company, LLC. - Request Approval of the Development Agreement (DA) To Design, Permit and Construct Improvements to Watergrass Parkway and Wells Road in Exchange for Transportation Development Fee Credits - Located South of Wells Road on Approximately on 931 Acres Within Villages L and M in the Villages of Pasadena Hills
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P60 and P61.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 6, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 6, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PEG-24-0353 in full →Heard once. PEG-24-0353 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Aug 6, 2024BoardP60▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 12 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay. Uh all those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed, like sign. Okay. Motion passes five zero. Move on to the next item would be item number P60, and this is the start of our consent items.
First consent item.
B Safety.
Um Mr. Chairman at this point we have no one signed up to speak to any of the consent it uh correction. On item 63 we have an a person signed to speak, Charles Hall.
I understand. We'll take them one at a time.
Do you want to do proof of publication for P sixty?
Publication on
P sixty, May 22nd, 2024, edition of the Tampa Bay Times.
Thank you. Item P sixty is PG twenty-four zero three five three. This is a development agreement. De Pew East MPUD Master Plan Unit Development.
Permit and construct improvements to Water Brass Parkway and Wells Road in exchange for transportation development free credits. This item we did add an addition to one of the exhibits, which under your attachments is listed as exhibit B. The applicant has decided to call that exhibit C, but it's just an addition to that exhibit that was provided to the clerk's office. This was presented to the Pasadena Hills Plan. and policy committee on June fifth, twenty twenty four, and it went to the local planning agency on July eleventh, twenty
twenty four. We ask that you approve the development agreement.
Okay. Is anyone here to speak against this item?