Development Agreement (Continuance) – Hamilton Oaks MPUD Master Planned Unit Development –Stephanie V. Benson, William D Brown, et al. – Proposed is a Development Agreement (DA) for Hamilton Oaks MPUD
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jan 9, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jan 9, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-0434 in full →Heard once. PDE-25-0434 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Jan 9, 2025PlanningPC3▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 5 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Good afternoon. Leam Devine, Planning Development and Economic Growth Department. Um item PC three, which I do have some corrections to read into a record. Um your agenda package um states it's PDE 25-0434. That should actually read PDE 25-0082. Additionally, the subject line of that agenda item should read as Development Agreement, Hamilton Oaks MPUD Master Plan Unit
Development. AMH development LLC, and this will be coming with a request to continue the item to the January 23rd meeting for Planning Commission at 1.30 in Newport Ritchie.
Okay.
All right. Let's go to the next one. Okay. Is is the applicant present, by the way?
Anybody here to object? Okay.