Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road

13:12Next. PC four, PDE 25-7738, and it is a zoning amendment in the names of evan in the name of Evans County Line 80, MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development, Evans Property Inc. This is coming with a request to continue the item to the Planning Commission meeting on February 6th at 130 in Dade City. All right.

13:37I would like to note we do have somebody who signed up for public comment on that one, James Narvaro, but this is a continuance item.

13:45Okay.

13:46Um is Mr. Navarro here.

13:51I have a general comment regarding the question.

13:53Excuse me, one just a minute, Mr. Navarro. If you're going to speak, we just need you to come up to the because it we have to have it on record. So we need your we need your name and adjust, but let me just say this before you do speak. If this is going to be continued, it'll come up at a different date. So it won't it won't be heard for consideration today. So if you wanna hold your comments until it does come up, that's your option. But if you speak today, you won't

14:24be able to speak at the next meeting.

14:26All right, my name is James Navarro. I live at [address removed]. My comments, I selected uh PC four, or it could be any one of these uh items on the agenda, is pretty general. My consideration or my concerns here is that this committee has um, in my opinion, since I've been here over 35 years. has uh open it's like the Wild Wild West when it comes to approving agricultural

14:57land for high density residential. I live right next door and there's another this young lady here was stating that they were gonna uh break up the land f uh for uh ten ten units possibly uh more. So my concern is general. I'd like to be able to say that we all like to enjoy agricultural lands and enjoy animals and chickens

15:28and and I have those. But since I've been here it's been constant road traffics coming through. I live right on Blaton and um Hopefully with this new uh members or some of the you guys are new. um can do something about the constant uh uh traffic flow and breakup of the land so we uh appreciate. You guys started with the with the uh Tampa

15:58Electric, with the uh Uh so the only I mean the um So solar panels across the street from the college you have these multi units. Right next door to me, we're gonna have another split of ten, and now we've got this 300. unit plus another one on uh uh thirty-four acres? What's going on? Why do you why do you guys insist on agreeing to doing that when you know this area is

16:28mostly for agriculture? for people to enjoy

16:36That's all

16:37I have to say. All right. Thank you very much. Mr Chair I appreciate your comments.

16:41Yes. I think if it's okay with the Planning Commission you should consider those comments as just being general public comment.

16:46Okay.

16:47Because I don't it doesn't feel like he was really speaking to P C four. Right. I I I don't want him to be prohibited from speaking on P C four. Okay. And I also don't want to have to give the applicant rebuttal because the comments were More general nature, so I don't I think you should just construe it as being general public comment.

17:07Uh Mr. Evans, for the record then it means what me means is When it does come up for for it to be heard you can come up and speak again. Okay. Mm.

17:19Thank you, David.