Zoning Amendment (Continuance) - Little Road MPUD Master Planned Unit Development - Nguyen Thien - A Rezoning Petition from E-R Estate Residential District to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow for 23 Townhomes and 32,452 Square Feet (SF) of Commercial Uses and Associated Infrastructure on 7.83 Acres, Located on the East Side of Little Road Approximately 550 Feet North of the Intersection of Little Road and Jasmine Boulevard

1:48:01There are two two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there is no opposition, the application will be considered by the board without further presentation. If staff or planning commission has recommended denial, Or if there is opposition to the application, the applicant will be given five minutes for presentation. The opposition will be given three minutes for each individual or five minutes for a group representative. And the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal.

1:48:32Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object. To any condition of the rezoning, may at this time request the petition be pulled from the consent agenda, in which case that application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise, all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to any petition. Please give your name and address and whether or not you've been sworn for the record. These are quasi-judicial public

1:49:02hearing. The law in Florida is that mere public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action. Please limit your comments to those criteria found within the Board's Land Development Code. Madam Clerk, would you like to swear the public hand?

1:49:18Yes, please. So if anyone is going to speak to any of the items, please stand and raise your right hand.

1:49:25Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth, so help you God? Thank you.

1:49:35All right, so P sixty three, yep. P sixty three was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times February fifth, twenty twenty five.

1:49:43Mm-hmm. Niktarios Pitos, Planning Development, Economic Growth Department. Item P63 is PDE 257721. This is a zoning amendment in the name of Little Road MPUD Master Planning and Development by Nurgentian. This is uh recommended for a continuance to the August nineteenth, twenty twenty five Board of County Commissioners meeting at one thirty P. M. in New Portie.

1:50:06Um this is a continuance. Does anyone here wish to speak to get us? We don't need to. Oh we don't have to because it's

1:50:13continuance.

1:50:14Thank you. Next one. one.

1:50:16We're gonna need a vote. Need a second vote.

1:50:19Not a consent. Second. All All

1:50:21in favor?

1:50:22Aye. We're down to three. Next one.

1:50:27Okay, P sixty four is advertised in Tampa Bay Times, April thirty, twenty twenty five.

1:50:32Item P64 is PDE 257749. This is a zoning amendment in the name of Pasco Mine MPUD Master Plan Unit Development by KM Pasco 130 Holdings LLC. This is requested for a continuance to the July 15, 2025 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 130 PM in Date City.

1:50:50All right, I'll take a motion.

1:50:52I move. Continuous.

1:50:56Lisa, you got a second.

1:50:57Okay, second. Sorry.

1:50:59She's not used to You're the only one that can do it.

1:51:04All in favor? Aye.

1:51:08Keeping it a zoning. That's okay. P sixty-five was advertised in Tampa Bay Times March fifth, twenty twenty five.

1:51:15Item P65 is PDE 257811. This is a zoning amendment in the name of SR 52 Elite, JDP Elite Development LLC. Uh this is a request to continue the item to a date uncertain.

1:51:29Move to continue a date uncertain.

1:51:31Second.

1:51:32All in favor? Aye. What do you think about that, huh?

1:51:38You could do it again here in

1:51:39just a second. P sixty-six was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times March nineteenth, twenty twenty five.

1:51:45Item P sixty six is PD twenty five zero one four four. This is a development agreement. In the name of Riverstone, formerly known as Renner, M P U D by KB Holmes, Tampa, LLC, this is requested for a continuance to the July fifteenth, twenty twenty five Board of County Commissioners meeting at one thirty P. M. in Dade City. Oh, okay.

1:52:05All right. Move to continue till July fifteenth.

1:52:08Second.

1:52:08All

1:52:09in favor?

1:52:09Aye. Aye.

1:52:11Okay, P sixty seven was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times March nineteenth, twenty twenty five.

1:52:18Item P67 is PDE 257838. This is a substantial modification to the River Stone, or formerly known as Renner M P U D by KB Homes, Tampa, LLC. This is also recommended for a continuance to the July 15, 2025 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 P. M. in Dade City.

1:52:35Okay, move to continue July fifteenth.

1:52:38Second.

1:52:39All in favor? Aye. Aye.

1:52:42Okay, P sixty-eight was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on May seventh, twenty twenty-five, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

1:52:54Item P68 is PDE 250158. This is a development agreement in the name of project at VOPH LLC to design, permit, and construct a portion of WERT or Elam Road in exchange for transportation development fee credits in the villages of Pasadena Hills. This comes to you with a recommendation to approve the development agreement. From uh the Planning Development Economic Growth Department as well as the Planning Commission and the VOPH. Planting and policy control.

1:53:26It's a gonna sound

1:53:27Yeah, I just I have as mu and I love the trails. I love the trails. But

1:53:34These road sections are just so big. Um, I just I thought we were gonna look at these and maybe do some road diets. We don't need ten foot utility easement on each side. I thought we had said we could live with five, first of all. Um And the eight foot landscape areas.

1:53:57I would say that's a good idea. I would chop that down to I mean, you can put an oak tree in six foot, right? Um

1:54:07I just I don't know if anyone else wants to speak to this, but I just feel these road sections. Does

1:54:12anybody have to speak against this?

1:54:14Huh?

1:54:15Is anyone here to speak against it?

1:54:18I just wonder no one has signed up. There's no one

1:54:22that's the question. You need call for public comment

1:54:24is

1:54:25I think the commissioner's point.

1:54:27Yeah. Does anyone else want to discuss these crazy road sections we have? Okay. If you wanna build them, developers, I'm trying to put more m land into the property owners, to the lots.

1:54:45All right, we'll keep it on consent if no one's here to speak to us.

1:54:50Does that

1:54:51is there anyone online that wants to speak to this? There is no one online. Is there anyone in the audience? Yeah.

1:54:58And we asked we already asked if uh anyone was here to speak against it. No one spoke.

1:55:04Well I I kinda called out specifically to the road, but Jess, um is there in

1:55:10Move pro

1:55:11Uh it's on consent. Do we have any others on consent? No. No. Okay. I'll take a second. All right, all in favor? Aye. Aye. All right, P