PC8 PDD 220369 Villages of Pasadena Hills code changes

23:24PC eight, I think Denise is right, it probably could have been on consent, although it's not I don't think it's showing as consent. But um I think there's a correction that needs to be discussed quickly.

23:39All right, let's do that first then. Denise, you want to go ahead with that?

23:45Yeah, absolutely. Um do you want to do a presentation on it or do you want to just discuss the correction that needs to be done? I I think

23:53Probably can just discuss the correction.

23:55Okay. So I'll I'll read the the not the title, but I'll I'll read the concept of it into record because you're sitting as a local planning agency. on this matter. So this is PDD 220369. This is some modifications to the J. Ben Harrell Villages of Pasadena Hills Stewardship District, which include revisions to texts, tables, and exhibits. This item was presented to the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee meeting on

24:25727 of 2022. And on this item, we're asking you to find it consistent with with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and if you'd recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. And um it looks like Joel too might be there to talk about the corrections that need to be made.

24:42Alright. Mr Two, would you like to comment?

24:47Yes, Mr. Chairman. Very briefly, Joel II for the record, to an associates. I represent VOPH master development company. Which is a new stakeholder in VOPH that actually is is funding the consultant work for these these VOPH updates. But technically, as uh David said, this is technically a county application. It was just brought to my attention prior to the hearing, and I apologize, but the transportation consultant uh for VOPH, Mr. Atefi,

25:18uh says that Section 602.10, 602.10, which is the VOPH transportation analysis description. We're proposing a modification with that new item four that has to do with the VC ratio, the volume to capacity ratio for intersections. And although we had reviewed this with the technical county transportation staff, Ali informs me that he thinks our terminology And

25:48I'll take one for the team because I drafted this after I got off the call With Amir, Asin, and Ali. But he says that the transportation technical team need to work on that exact wording. The concept is not in dispute that we're going to increase the VC ratio to 1.2 as long as we're prepared to do traffic monitoring for that specific location. And this is entirely consistent with what's done in the connected city, for example. So it's it's nothing new or different. But because

26:18ASIN and Amir were not available at this late notice, our request is if you would see fit to recommend the LBC changes forward with the simple caveat that the transportation team will get together provide Mr Goldstein and I whatever The modified language for that description is, and we will get that done before it gets to the first reading at BCC. Uh it's a technical item. that most of us don't understand anyway. So with your permission we'll we'll just defer

26:49that to the technical team at the county.

26:51I saw you look directly at me when you said that, but I don't

26:56I meant to look at the engineers because unfortunately we have a couple of them but they they do understand us so So that that's the request. Otherwise we don't really have anything to present on the land development code changes. Uh again, county staff initiated and the stakeholders and VOP ch are in agreement with these these changes. So and sorry for the confusion at the last minute on on that terminology.

27:22But it's that build the The intersection that exceeds or meets or exceeds 1.2 will be monitored so if there's a problem in the future it can be addressed.

27:33Exactly. Okay. And the only way we get to use that higher ratio in the analysis is if we add a condition to the approval that commits to that traffic monitoring.

27:42Understood.

27:43So it's addressed before there's a problem. Thank you.

27:46All

27:47right.

27:51So myself and uh Gavin Covey, who's the project manager, we will be we will work closely with the transportation folks to make sure that the language is appropriate and um and and show that language to Joel 2 and his team.

28:06All right. Very good. Uh is there anyone else here that needs to speak to this?

28:13Okay. If not, uh I'd like to hear a motion um to approve it subject to that modification of the language.

28:21We'll move to approve uh addendum item APC eight with the condition that the staff and the petitioners work to modify the language to accurately represent what they are trying to portray.

28:36Second.

28:38Okay, we have two seconds.

28:42All in favor, signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Like sign? Okay. Motion carries.