Spray jet paver on Little Road up to nineteen thousand
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 12, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 12, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 10m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 91% of 76 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Um so I asked um Uh Randy Shane from APS to come forward today to talk about the uh Bruce B. Downs project, how successful it was. Um Little Roads coming up as well, which starts this week, I believe. Um and on it was an I think another opportunity to take advantage of a great asphalt base sealing the joints up and it's like 0.05% of what the total cost would be of the project. just like the Bruce B. Dunn's project would be. So I'd
like to see it done because I will tell you that road. We did it four years ago as it was evaporate uh disintegrating on us. And I think we've got a video there, Sonya? That I sent over. Uh that that's the video of um APS's machines. It'll show the joints going beside it.
But the the video part is what I wanted to show as far as We had seen part of it before.
I'd like to jump so.
So this is just how Little Row looks as you're driving along.
And you'll notice the travel lanes.
Anyway, so if you look at the travel lanes, what happens is it it it delaminates right there continually, cars are gonna have to move in and out, etc. So I want to look at the long-term fix. I think if we spend the extra money to do it with the APS, it'll serve us for a lot longer. Um and recently I think with all the infrastructure making improvements, it's a it's another minuscule investment that gives us a higher quality product. Um I'm looking for the dollar amount. Was it nineteen thousand Mike?
What is is this uh material that you put in with the painting we're doing?
Well it's it's uh it's really the machine that does it. And then what the what happens is the you'll tack machines well you spray the tack down a truck then comes over with the asphalt, drives over the tack and puts the asphalt down. Sometimes it takes a little bit of delay, like when we did 41% of those sections, you put the tack down but it rained so they didn't even do the tack till the next day had to re-tack again. Right. This situation here is you're putting the tack down and the asphalt's coming right over top top of it. Then when you take a multiple
and
this happens immediately. Yeah. You smooth it all down. It's it's really a fast process as well as
Are we using this on a little road? Is this gonna start pretty soon? Do we know?
This is like gonna start this week. Um so is it something that's coming right up there's why kind of gotta bring it again. I asked staff as we did Bruce B. Downs to bring an agenda item back to where we could just redo the maybe the bid and just let them just go do it if they wanna if they wanna do it. Um I think we should spend it on every road to improve it, but you gotta there's gonna take a motion for that. Um
Did we have that number confirmed? Was it
I'm Jason Mickel, Public Works Director. To answer your question, Commissioner Mariano, the additional cost for the spray jet was uh estimated of um no more than 19,000.
Okay. So I'd like to make a motion we use the EPS technology uh for the nineteen thousand dollars.
Well Well I I I mean, what do you guys want to do, right? We can't tell them how to do their work. Wait, I I'm I got lost here.
Is is this the right thing to do? I mean
I mean should they bring us a proposal? I mean
This is the proposal.
Well I no, I I think that I think it looks fantastic and I I wanna I want to but I think there's a procedure.
Well and and like I
said,
the flow of the procedure is we put it in the bid specs to be put in there, but they didn't put it we can execute it instantly.
Who's who's
doing the job? It'll be APS. I'm
convinced I don't know what we're voting on. And I think the attorney's about
to speak here. APS.
So if you company. Okay, so if APS is doing the project um and this is a means and methods that APS can use, I I I guess I'm I too am a little confused as to why we need board action to do the work. That we can't just authorize this and move or we need board action to expend an extra nineteenth there's nothing in the contract. Is that is that the limitation here? I I too am just trying to understand. So maybe exactly. In in which case we can approve a change order.
If I if I could, um, just like we did with the Bruce B Downs uh several several meetings ago, um the the action required is to allow for that line item that does not exist in the current bids right now to be approved to spend that additional up to nineteen thousand dollars for this. particular item that is being singled out that is not included it's right now it's in the bids overall but
it's it's within a it's within the overall um kind of assortment of items. It's not called out specifically.
So the company that's that's one a bid Mr. Are they able to do this? Okay.
Why don't we have the purchasing director address how the how the bid is that? Yeah.
Good morning, Carrie Roberts, purchasing director. This was a line item bid. The contract was awarded to this vendor as a line item bid, and this item was not one of those specific line items. We also did not allow for additional work outside of those line items within the bid itself.
Okay.
But
I have never heard of
that.
So that's why that's why we would would need a motion to put this in. But as the company that won the bid, are they able to put this material in? Yes. They
are. And
and again,
Mr. Chairman M way back when we did the bids for this, we wanted to make that option. We didn't want to be locked in to have to do it every time.
Yeah.
But we wanted to put it in where we could do it. And I think we just need to somehow restructure the bid. where staff can just do it on the
Definitely Little Road would be a good idea.
Well and if you see if you see the if you see the if you if you would run keep running that video, you'll you'll see exactly where this is such a critical thing. I mean if you drive down Little Road to the south you'll actually see the joints separating, but... We play the video one more time?
Okay. But literally and this is like a classic case. It happened in the northern part of the road. I don't want to see it happen again too quickly. And if you put this extra strength better system down it's it's gonna just give us a much longer life armor. As you saw the tensile s the coefficient the strength is like double.
Do we have an anticipated
extent you know life extension of the road with this product. Like we paid twenty thousand dollars for the easier way to quantify like how much better.
We're we're gonna find out 'cause we did Hudson Avenue this way. Okay. Uh Bruce B. down so we'll get documentation, but again just for the base start, it it bonds much better. Okay. And last much more and then we can see the joints just going go down fifty before we're gonna have a little road. Those joints to me is like such a huge thing when you can connect them together with with the same tack.
Okay.
Yeah.
So
let me
remake the
motion? So the it's the it's the motion to add the work line item into it and then you'll negotiate price like up to twenty thousand or
no up to nineteen thousand okay.
Right. It's it's with and just so you know the moat the the cost of it is already factored in to what it's gonna be yeah I had 'em calculated and it was like up to nineteen thousand four hundred was it?
So Commissioner Weightman, um, It on on that particular item, um the estimate was provided by the vendor and verified by staff about approximately what that cost would be.
Okay.
So that's why we estimated the vendor confirmed by staff the nineteen thousand dollars.
Okay.
So I have a motion for that? You have a motion to spend up to nineteen thousand five hundred dollars for the uh spray deck technology.
Uh I'll second.
I thought you made which one of you made the motion? 'Cause that was confused there for was making it well, yeah, I thought. Okay, I got a motion and a second. Roll call vote.
District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District one, Chairman Oakley.
Aye. Motion passed five zero. Chairman
Mariano could make a motion to add this line item to the contract for the future so that in in the future we don't have to come back and ask again if we would like to use the technology.
So moved.
Second.
Got a motion to second by roll call vote.
District two, Commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. All right. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
District five, Commissioner Mariano. District one, Chairman Oakley.
Aye. Motion pass five zero. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Okay.
I do two.