Consent approval of public hearing items
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 21, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 21, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 88% of 16 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Seventy-six was consent.
Seventy-seven, seventy-eight, seventy-nine, and eighty on the consent.
Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. I have a question on those streetlights. I mean, I'm not sure. I is there a better way to do this? Can it be done at some other process in the development process than To come back up and do 'em later?
Yeah, so what If I'm understanding your cru your question directly, so what happens is you have two two different things, right? You can have residents that will come and ask for additions or or modifications, and we will go do that. We'll audit their districts at the same time. If there requires a rate increase, we'll come back at the same time. You also have developments that are coming online that have existing streetlight services areas. So the developers will come and ask us, hey, we don't want to administrat the district on our own. We like the county to have. handle that and so they go through our petition process which we formalized here in the last year to
only do during the springtime. So whereas before if you remember kind of a couple of years ago we would come ad hoc throughout the spring and do a number of these different districts. We try and do them all at once depending on which side of the county. So we've kind of limited it now through the petition process that runs from January through April to where we bring these to you in two separate meetings. One on the east side, one on the west side.
So I'm kind of thinking of um how we eliminated the um the liquor, the conditional uses for um liquor to administrative. We can't because it's a tax levy of some sort.
You're creating a tac a a municipal service benefit unit to pay for these great things.
Because I've never seen anyone say no. So just just trying to save everyone time and Say the public time?
We're required any time we modify existing districts to add additional benefiting areas. So i.e. different people will get that on their tax bill, we have to come back to the board. If you have an increase in the district rate, we have to come back to the board. Okay. We do however do a number of audits and things like that where you'll reduce rates. Those do not have to come back to the board. We take those as regular consent items. Okay.
Yeah.
And
I see Ainsley moving over.
Years ago we had um some people in uh Commissioner Oakley's district in Lakie that came out and spoke at the end of the year. That's right.
Yeah, they worried about the Yeah.
Yeah. They didn't want to pay for it.
Yeah. Okay, thank you.