Consent agenda zoning and streetlight improvements
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Apr 20, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Apr 20, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 12m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 84% of 95 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
And we silently heard 'em all say aye. So Okay, with that we go to uh P fifty one.
Item P fifty one was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March 10th, 2021.
Mr. Chair, if I may ask, um on the item that was moved from the morning session to the afternoon, which is the rescision of Um Conerton, when would you like to take care of that?
Perfect. Thank you so much. Yes, sir. Thank you. Uh P51 is PDD 21, 7523, and it's a rezoning. Robert and Teresa Britton for a change in zoning from AC Agricultural District to AR, Agricultural Residential District, with a voluntarily dec uh agreed upon deed restriction limiting. to a total of two home sites, total of two lots altogether on a little bit over 10 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval as stated in your agenda packet, of course subject
to the voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction from both the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
Okay. Is anyone here to Uh speak against this item.
I do not have anyone on WebEx uh to speak uh to the speak against the item, nor do I have any emails to read on the record. Um the applicant, uh Mr. Britton is on, but we're not able to promote him to speak. Yep.
So I don't have anyone to speak against it. May it remain on consent. Move to P fifty two.
Item P fifty two was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March tenth, twenty twenty-one.
P52 is PDD 217505 is the zoning amendment. Salem Media Master Plan Unit Development District, Salem Radio Properties, Inc. It's a rezoning from AC Agricultural District to a Master Plan Unit Development District to allow 325 residential units on approximately 77.21 acres. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet from both the plan. Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.
I have a question on this one. Yep. I'm gonna try to find it here real quick. Did I see that this is like a town home product?
And where would I where would I find that?
Sure, I believe the applicant is on here. I am not certain that this is actually a townhome product. It's uh single-family homes. Um not sure if they're actually attached is what's being proposed. Here's Jessica to answer that question. Okay.
Jessica Cole, the Planning Development Department. The applicant is proposing single family attached and detached units. So it is single family like fee simple owned lots, but they did not have the specific detached only noted.
Okay, just um after seeing those townhomes with no trees, I'm just gonna ask everybody who comes in here who wants to do rezoning on a multifamily if they're gonna put landscaping in the
Oh.
If they're gonna put landscaping in the front, um because that's We we we just have to protect protect the county.
To speak to lot trees, you mean?
Yeah.
So currently the code doesn't require that, but I I will definitely
Well I d I know that what their code requires is they have to have X amount of trees per lot and they're allowed to put them in the back and then they cut them down and then we have no trees. Ciao. I'm just gonna be asking those questions until we fix our land development code. So um who's the applicant?
Miss Barbara Wilhite is representing the Bayonet Point.
Okay. Miss Barbara?
We just pulled it. Is this what you pulled from consent? Oh okay,
we'll pull it from consent.
Thank
you.
Okay, if there's no one else to speak speak against this product then Uh it will remain on consent.
No, sh we just pulled this one from consent. So we
just pulled it from okay.
For discussion.
So we pull it put it at the end? Okay. And we move on to P fifty three.
Item P 53 was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March 10, 2021.
PDD 210250, this is a development agreement, Meritage Homes of Florida Inc., a development agreement to limit debt density, convey right-of-way, and provide a drainage retention area in exchange for mobility fee credits and a partial waiver of neighborhood park and landscape buffering requirements. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval. And as background from this, this is basically was part of rezoning 7497 on October 20th, 2020. There was a deed
restriction recorded and promised that in the future there would be a development agreement coming forward. And this is the development agreement.
Is anyone here to speak against this item?
I do not have anyone on WebEx and there were no emails to read on the record.
Is anyone at the kiosks to speak against this item?
Can I can I can I ask a question please? Absolutely. Why are we w waving uh landscaping?
Whoa. Wait a minute.
Is it are we buffering a wetland or what's
there any way to speak to this item at the kiosks?
There
is nobody here at the kiosk for that item.
All right, thank you. Or may that item remain on consent?
If she can answer it real quick, I won't pull it. If she can answer it real quick. Yeah. So basically um there is a uh a a flip-hilling compensation area and uh what's going on is that they're reducing the type D buffer that is adjacent to the right-of-way of Morris Bridge Ro Road because they're providing They're providing actually additional right-of-way based on a an actual study that was done by the county. that requires um that actual dedication of right of way. So
the the buffer's just being reduced. The twenty foot buffer is being reduced. To a A G? No, no. It's supposed to be a type D buffer. Um so that no twenty no type D buffer is required with respects to any lots that are that is adjacent to the drainage. area. So if it's adjacent to the drainage bay area and the flood pain compensation area. They don't have to provide a buffer. However, a 20-foot type debuffer continues to apply where the
residential lots directly abut the future right-of-way of Morris Bridge Road. So they're just not buffering a drainage and wetland comp a wetland compensation area. That's what's being reduced.
All right. I'm I'll leave this one on, but I'm gonna be watching these.
Go to P fifty four.
Item P fifty four was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March twenty fourth, twenty twenty one.
All right, Justin Grant, Public Infrastructure, Fiscal and Business Administration. This is a resolution by the Board of County Commissioners of Pasco County, Florida, authorizing an upgrade to the street lighting improvements and assessment rate change for the ILECO estates streetlight service area in accordance with Pasco County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 94, Article 2, Sections 94 through 46. And I'm sorry, 94 46 through 94 56 comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
And commissioners, I look uh all of these are going to result in a reduction in the in the fees, right? No.
You're switching to
LED lights?
So we're switching to LED lights. These are actually so we go through and we do an audit every year, and so that we're auditing all systematically auditing all the districts. These are all coming to you today with a recommendation of approval to upgrade to LED lights. We would have had to increase the uh the rates in those.
The increase is less by going to the cost of the year. Yeah, that's what I'm
saying. It's a decrease in their costs.
Uh well, no. Each each one of these rates on their annual tax bill will go up, but it will go up less than if we remained. And so it's good for them. It's good for them. It's it's with the strategic strategic plan for safety that all of these are being upgraded.
Commissioner, is this your neighborhood? No. Where is a Lico Estates? I yeah, I didn't know whether That was the name of the right-of-way.
We have the presentation if you want to see the map.
That's okay. Well we'll want that if we have someone that's gonna be against her. Is anyone on WebEx? There is no
one on WebEx and no emails to read on this item. It's not
anyone at the kioks on Adam B. Bitch Vore.
There's nobody at the kiosk for that item. All right, thank you.
May it remain on uh consent. We move to P fifty five.
Item P fifty five was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-one.
All right. This is a resolution by the Board of County Commissioners of Pasco County, Florida, authorizing an upgraded street lighting improvements and an assessment rate change for the Colonial Oak Streetlight Service Area in accordance with the Pasco County Code of Ordinance, just Chapter 94, Article 2, Sections 94-46 through 94-56. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Uh is anyone to speak to this on WebEx or email?
No one on Webex and no emails to read.
Okay, is anyone at the kiosk to speak against item P fifty five?
There is nobody at the kiosk for that item. All right,
thank you. May that remain on consent. Yeah, uh No we got another one. We move on to P Pitch Six.
Item P fifty six was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-one.
IP fifty six resolution by the Board of County Commissioners of Pasco County, Florida, authorizing an upgrade to the streetlight. Uh street lighting improvements and assessment rate change for Ellington Place, formerly known as Siena Woods, Street Light Service Area, in accordance with Pasco County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 94, Article 2, Sections 94-46 through 94-56. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, zo new to speak on WebEx?
There is no one on WebEx and no emails to read on this
anyone to speak against this item at the kiosks.
There is nobody here for that item.
Okay. Thank you. We may it remain on consent. We move on to P fifty seven.
Item P 57 was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March 24, 2021.
IP 57 resolution by the Board of County Commissioners of Pasco County, Florida, authorizing an upgrade to the street lighting improvements and an assessment rate change for the Fairway Springs Streetlight Service Area in accordance with the Pasco County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 94, Article 2, Sections 94-46 through 94-56. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay. Anyone on WebEx or
There is no one on WebEx and no emails to read um for this item.
Okay. Uh have it at the kiosks anyway there to for P fifty seven.
There is nobody here for that item.
Okay, thank you. Okay, that's the final item on consent. Who approval the consent agenda? Okay. I got a motion.
And
a second.
And a second for the approval of the consent agenda by roll call vote.
District two, Commissioner Moore.
Aye.
District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Aye.
District one, Chairman Oakley.