Consent agenda approval and pulled items
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Dec 7, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Dec 7, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 14m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 61% of 87 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Following item is PC 11. On this one, Mr. Poole will be recusing himself. It's PDD 247752. It's a zoning amendment in the name of BMC 31722, State Route 52 LLC, for a change in zoning from a C2 General Commercial District with voluntarily agreed-upon D-restrictions to a C2 General Commercial District with amended voluntarily agreed-upon D-restrictions. Restrictions. This the if this looks familiar is because it came to you earlier
last year. And basically, what it is is they're modifying their deed restriction to allow the accessory use of RV and boat storage, which would be accessory to the storage facility. And the actual deed restriction. are listed in finding a fact. Number Two, they're pretty extensive, so two A through E. And it also includes reserving the uses for general commercial
district uses. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, is the applicant present?
Okay, is there anybody else here to speak on this item?
Since Mr Poole is recusing himself, shall we vote on this separately than the rest of the consent? Yes. Okay. So even though this is a consent item. We entertain a motion now.
I'll make a motion to approve.
Second.
All right, motion and a second. Any other discussion?
Just to say, I don't think we should be deed restricting properties. as a way to get around you the inability to condition Euclidean zonings as I counseled the applicant back on February second.
Okay. Any other discussion? Okay, uh all in favor?
I
Opposed? The motion carries.
Following item is PC twelve, P D D twenty four, seven seven five zero. It's a zoning amendment. Irving D and Melanie Melody M. Delgado for a change in zoning from an A C agricultural district to an AR five agricultural residential district comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, is the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present.
Okay, is there anybody else here to speak on this item?
Okay, well next the next one.
Sure. Item PC thirteen is PDD twenty-four seven seven five three. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Carly Properties LLC and Scotty Crockett. Change in zoning from an AC Agricultural District, C1 neighborhood commercial district, and an I-1 Light Industrial Park District to an I-1 Light Industrial Park District with a deed restri with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction restricting the uses specifically to those uses uh listed in the I-1. Light Industrial Park District comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay, is the applicant present? Please Barbara, you're busy. Uh anybody else here to speak on this item?
Okay, we have another speaker, so I guess we need to pull this item.
Okay.
So, Mr. Chair, we're going to move on to item PC 21. These are the ones that you talked about that they're companions, because PC21 is the compan is companion to PC 14. PC21 is PDE 240032. On this one, you're sitting as a local planning agency. It's CPA 2302 Land O' Lakes 5241. This is a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps. 2-15 and Sheet 12, changing from ROR retail office residential, comm commercial, and res 3, residential
three dwelling units per gross acre, to PD plan development on approximately 76.72 acres of real property that's located south side of State Road 52, approximately 900 feet west of Land O' Lakes Boulevard, and a text amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.76 Land O' Lakes. 5241 and a map amendment to the future land use map two-nine set adding sub-area map two-nine seventy-six, landing lakes fifty-two-41, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency,
providing repeal or severability and effective date.
on this item.
And which one's the zoning amendment?
PC
fourteen.
Can we have a presentation on
that one? Um absolutely for PC twenty one? Yeah. Sure. If my colleagues can come up and Or do you want me to just pull it off consent, continue with the consent?
Yeah, well let's pull it off a consent and then we'll come back to it.
Uh do and PC fourteen should be pulled as well.
Yeah.
All right. Next item is PC 15. That one is PDD 240001, C Pass 2313, Chansey, and State Route 39 is for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, changing from Res 9 to COM on 4.84 acres. Comes to you with a recommendation that you find it consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
And Mr. Pool Poole's recusing himself on that one too? Mr.
Poole I yes, I apologize that one Mr. Poole's recusing himself on Mr.
Mr. Is the applicant present?
Is there anyone else here to speak on this item?
I don't necessarily need to pull the pull the item but I ask a quick question. Is there a deed restriction there for the Lib Local Cold
The deed restriction will come along with the rezoning. Okay. It can't be put on the compliment.
Okay, so Since Mr. Pools recused himself, I think we need to vote on this one individually. So is our motion?
Actually can we go ahead and have the presentation on it?
Okay, so we're gonna pull.
Right, so we're gonna pull that one.
So the following one is PC 16, and that is PDD 240002, comprehensive plan amendment, C Pass 2314, Bogar US301 for a comprehensive plan amendment to future land use map, changing from COM commercial to PD plan development. on 26.11 acres of property that's located east of 301 at the northeast intersection of US 301 and Roanoke River Way.
The planning and development staff is asking that you find the application consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the board of county commissioners.
Okay, is the applicant present? Anyone else here to speak on that item? This item? Okay.
Nothing up here? Uh
I'd like to hear a presentation on that one.
I'll move on to PC seventeen. Um that is PD twenty-four zero zero zero seven. Um actually this will this one is gonna be cold. I apologize. There's someone who was signed up to speak for this one. So we're pulling PC seventeen.
It is no longer. Yes.
The following item um were is also a companion. So P twenty two, which is on regular by misfi in error. Um I'm going to uh do that after PC eighteen. So PC eighteen is P D D twenty four zero zero zero nine, C Pass twenty-three oh eight, Hudson Family Trail. It's for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, changing from res one. Residential one-dwelling unit for gross acre to Res 3 on approximately 38.71 acres that's
located on the north north of Hudson Avenue and 1.68 miles west of Hayes Road. Comes to you with a recommendation that you find this, and you're sitting as a local planning agency on this one, that you find it consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Is the applicant present? Anybody else here to speak on this item? Anything from up here?
I'm willing to leave it on the consent, but this actually oughta be being heard in Newport Ritchie. Yeah. That's a wet that's clearly west of US forty one. What
was that moved to this meeting because of December?
Yes, so there's
so
so first off there's two reasons there's only one hearing in December. Secondly, it has the the policy changed even before Mr. John Gallagher left the county that there's not an east-west divider. And what we do speak to and and now even after COVID, there's even more potential for folks to be able to to speak to items because they can register. on WebEx and those type of things. Additionally, we do every single applicant when we talk to our applicants and hopefully some of the ones behind me can say amen, we tell them that
if the that if there's any opposition on their item, it will be continued to the side of the county that it's that it's you know closest to. I didn't hear an Amen, but you know I'm not I'm not appropriate. Thank you. I'll
move approval on that.
Well we're gonna just gonna keep that on consent. It's gonna stay our consent, correct?
So that was um that was PC18. So I'm now going to do the companion zoning item, which is P22, which was placed on regular in error. It's consent, and no one has contacted the team about it. PDD 247732, Hudson Trail, Family Trail, M P U D, H W H G C N G A L L C. It's for a rezoning from an AC agricultural district to an M P. PUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow the development of 116 single-family residential units on approximately
38.72 acres comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Okay, is the applicant present? Anybody here to speak on this item?
Anything from up here? Okay, we'll keep it on consent.
Following item is PC 19, that's PDD 240038, C Pass 23-20, SAV Old Pasco Town Homes. It's for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map from Res 3, residential three-dwelling units for gross acre to Res 6 on approximately 18.36 acres of property that is located on the northeast corner of Old Pasco Road and Hadlock Drive. And um staff is rec requesting that you find it consistent with a comprehensive comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the board.
Okay, is the applicant present? Anybody here to object?
All right, any other any other dis any other discussion? Oh you're here to object. Okay, I'm sorry. I thought you raised your hand because you're applicant. I'm sorry. Okay, so we'll pull that item as well.
Okay.
And uh
The last item is PC20, PDD 240024. Mr. Poole will be recusing himself on this item. On this item, you're sitting as the LPA of a local planning agency. It's CPA 2301 Fletcher. It's for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, changing from Res 3, residential three dwelling units for Gross Acre, and AG. Agricultural to PD plan development on approximately approximately 100.8 acres that is located
to the west of US 41, south of Leland Avenue, and 1.1 miles north of State Route 52. I will mention for the Planning Commission that this item is within the airport zone and the runway protection zone and the approach surface floor and the applicant has worked diligently with the airports and has you know had good collaboration and good discussion with the pilot country airport. Just want to mention that. Staff
is requesting that you find it consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners and there will be a companion rezoning to MPUD coming shortly for that one.
Okay. Is the applicant present? Is there anybody here to object? I guess to kinda echo Denise's thoughts there, that's a pretty good job 'cause I know we've had some stuff come in before around that airport and Even before the runway production zones and all that we heard quite a bit of opposition for anything going around that area. So good job.
Uh okay, so it's a separate item so we'll probably need to have a motion, a separate motion motion on this one.
Move to approve item P C twenty.
Okay. Second?
Second.
Motion a second. All in favor? All right. Opposed? Motion carries.
And that's the end of the consent item or the consent agenda, correct, Denise? Yes, correct.
So Mr. Mr. Chair, I'd move approval to uh PC twelve, PC twenty two, and PC eighteen.
Second.
Okay, motion and a second. Any other discussion? All in favor? Aye. Proposed, motion carries.
What did you say about twenty minutes?
Alright, so Where are we back to? P s P C thirteen, correct?