Regional MPO MOU
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 10, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 10, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 78% of 37 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
kinda going out to David. Um and They're asking if uh we can have the regional MPO MOU at the MPO meeting on Thursday. So apparently you just you guys got it Friday
We it came in after we we assigned RLSs on Friday, so it was assigned yesterday afternoon.
Okay. Assigned to I mean what do you have to do?
Well, the the problem is it has no legal review and it is not really an MOU.
Oh well it's been approved by Hillsborough. No, it will be voted on tomorrow by Hillsborough and Penelas. And and so we'd like to we need it at our
MPO?
It's that one that Is it one that
we're wanna be a part of that research?
It's a research, yeah. And it's just a
We should be a part of that.
It's actually required by the legislature
so Oh yeah. We should be a part of that and we I think it's set up we can do that on Thursday.
We actually tweaked it at the TMA uh to make it uh even a little better. Jackie you were on the line. Okay. Seth was online. So um I mean I'm I'm good with it to move forward. And of course we it's our the
problem it the problem is if if it is a memorandum of un understanding, then why did it have Yeah. uh provisions about who's gonna sue who where. Yeah, you know. It Particular pet peeve, if it's a memorandum of understanding It's aspirational. If it's an agreement and it ha and you want it to have teeth, it should have teeth. But then but those are two separate legal
reviews.
I don't recall anything about suing but the stuff we looked at.
Yeah, I didn't see that either. But but uh we wouldn't be suing uh during a r uh a study. So it's not the final MOU and I think we can work on all that.
Well is it the fine No, no,
no.
Well then what do you want prevent presented? That's that that's
all right, so why don't we do this? Why don't Jeff if you would send to us or Mike send to us what we're gonna be looking at and we can give you our comments because obviously the meeting will be over by then and so and see what happens Thursday. At least we we can review it ahead of time. sure with all the all the board members. I mean we I
don't I think we strike through provisions that we don't think should be in it, but but now I'm hearing that that Penellis and Penelis and Hillsboro It's in final form for them.
J just as the dr uh just as a I don't
think it's in final
form.
No, no. Well no, they're they're voting on it tomorrow.
They're voting to be in the study.
Yeah.
Other MPOs being a regional MPO.
To study it. Not to be one
to study. Only to study it. That's correct. It's
not a final document.
It's not a final document.
Yes. And
we should be a part of the study.
I mean call Secretary Quinn if you can. Whether we're part of the whole final or whoever his point person is, but he's the one calling me. He's called me twice. He
he he was just calling me too.