Approve consent agenda River Landing MPUD
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Mar 28, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Mar 28, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Good afternoon, Mr. Chair, Planning Commission Members, Denise Hernandez, Planning and Development. First item is item PC one, which is PDD 197397A. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Long Lake Ranch, MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Jurassi, Roy Nicholas III, and Louis Jurassi LLLP. This is a rezoning from an AC and an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to an MPUD for the addition of approximately 38.642 acres to an already existing
master plan. And this comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions. as included in your packet.
All right.
Yeah it is.
Then he is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? Okay, so you'd like it pulled for consideration? Okay.
Thank you. Item PC two is PDD nineteen seven three seven zero in the name of River Landing M PUD Master Plan Unit Development Zephyr Egg Company. This is a substantial modification to rezone. To rezone from AC Agricultural and MPUD Master Plan Unit Development Districts to allow 1,999 single-family detached attached to multifamily dwellings, 250,000 square feet of commercial retail, and 150,000 square feet of office on approximately 801 acres. This comes to you
with a recommendation of approval with conditions. I do want to comment that on finding of fact number five in your package. Just want to make a comment that Two Rivers has not had an opportunity to review uh the agenda item.
And again this comes to you with recommendations of approval with conditions.
Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? See no objections?
Um I would also like and I apologize, jumping on to your item P four and P five. These are actually continuance items. I would like to read the continuance into record, if I may.
Okay.
Or do you wan or or or David, should they vote on the consent? First.
take public comment on P4 and P5 because those were not noted as continuous. Approval
the consent. Has a motion to approve the consent agenda. As modified. And we have a second. Any further discussion? All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Motion carries. Okay.