Request to continue Grand Oaks MPUD zoning amendment
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Mar 28, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Mar 28, 2019
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 86% of 7 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Item P five is PDD 197351. This is a zoning amendment, the companion to item P4, Grand Oakes MPUD. This is also a request to continue from the applicant to the May 9, 2019 Planning Commission at 130 in Date City.
Okay. So can you ask for public comment again, I'm sorry. Yes. Public comment? Yeah. Move to continue to May ninth. Intaid City.
Motion to continue?
Say.
Second. Further discussion? All in favor? All right.
So you're finally gonna do something, huh? You know, it
was on consent and I thought I'd get out of here, but no such love.