Consent items, continuances, rezoning, and pulled item
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jun 2, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jun 2, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 8m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 94% of 36 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Thank you. Good afternoon, Mr Chair and Commissioners. Roberto Bestarrillo, Planning Department Plan Development Department. I'm here facilitating in the absence of Denise Hernandez. And um so we're just gonna start. We have four items on consent, two of which are continuances.
The first item, PC three, is the Sony Amendment to continuance for Hale Collyer M PUD Master Plan Unit Development. For Julian Hurden. Walter and Elizabeth Fansel. The Fansel family the revocable trust, a resonate request for AR Agricultural Residential and R R one Rural Residential Rural Density Residential Sonic District to an MPUD to allow for a maximum of 109 single family detached dwelling units
and associated infrastructure on approximately forty six point one acres. This is continued to a date uncertain. All right. Do
I have a motion to uh approve the continuance?
I'll make a motion of it.
Okay. We have a motion and do we have a second? Second. We have a second. Any further discussion of the motion? All in favor in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed like signed. Motion carries.
Thank you. PC four is a continuance. An ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code Section 1104 Flood Damage Prevention to bring the County's flood damage prevention regulations in line with the model ordinance approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and to coordinate with Chapter 18, Buildings and Buildings Regulations. Of the Pasco County Code of of ordinance, amending Land Development Code Appendix
A definitions and other sections as necessary for internal consistency, incorporating FEMA's most recent flood insurance study for Pasco County establishing areas of special flood hazards. Recodifying building officials to perform analysis for building permit application applications on structures within floodplain hazard areas, and providing methods processed for such analysis, requiring signed declaration of land restrictions,
non-conversion agreements for projects proposing to enclose areas under elevated buildings. certain crawl spaces and certain accessory structures, adding requirements for activities, altering sand dunes or mangrove stands in coastal A zones, recodifying elevation information prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy in coastal A zones, recodifying county approval for letters of map changes to FEMA, recodifying encroachment development and fill on properties within floodways, Adding or
recodifying res restrictions on locations of critical facilities, detached accessory structures, manufactured homes, RVs, park trailers, tank decks, patio patios, and other development of floodways, recodifying FEMA guidance. Publications and technical by reference, changing variance procedures for planning commission to hearing officer processes, requiring data to provide to be provided in areas identified as sheet flow and ponding, providing a
variance process for certain agricultural structures, additional specific findings required for variances, providing or amending the f follow. Definitions, accessory structures, agricultural structure, coastal A zone, CAZs, critical facilities, declarations of land restrictions, non-conversion agreements, existing manufactured home park or subdivision, expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, flood hazard areas,
historic structures, letter map change, LOMOS LOM LOM CS, Limit of Motor Wave Actions, Limos, Market Value, New Manufactured Home Park or Subdivisions and Park Trailer, Park Model, Providing For Applicability Repealer providing for several inclusion inclusion into the Land Development Code and effective date. This is continued to the seven uh July seventh uh PC meeting.
All right. So we have a request for continuance. I hear a motion.
So I'm moving. I'll second it.
In a second. Any further discussion? If not, I'll signify by saying aye. Aye, opposed, like signs. Okay.
Thank you. PC five, it's uh based on consent. This is a Sony amendment for Sandy Lakes Development Corp of Sandy Lakes uh Purcell changes in Sony from MPU D Master Plan Unit Development District Trinity Communities to an MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District together with a voluntary agreed upon D Restriction limiting the number of units to one hundred and sixty three, providing
for the product. Will be town town homes that are a maximum of two stories in height or other non-apartment multifamily uses and providing for lot trees and additional planting requirements.
And this is uh P D twenty two seven six twenty-one.
Okay, and is the applicant present?
Yes.
Okay,
anyone here to object? Uh we have not received any notification of objections. Okay, and nobody's on WebX? Nobody signed up for WebEx.
All right, thank you.
Next item is PC six. PD D twenty seven uh I believe there's a typo. It should be seventy-five ninety-three.
And this is for Ronin Amendment for Norton Ridge MPUD Master Plan Unit Development for North Ridge, and again there's another typo, which is should be 829 LLC. Rizoni requests an AEC agricultural district, AER State Residential District, and an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to an MPUD Master Plan unit development to allow for four thousand square feet of commercial office and seven hundred and seventy
single family detached units on approximately one hundred and seventy-eight point fifteen acres.
Okay. And the applicants present? Went here to object. We haven't I don't see any I don't see any objections. We have no on
Yeah, we can touch it.
Okay, I don't I didn't see your ha hand.
That's okay. Don't worry about it. We'll we'll we'll pull it from consent and we'll we'll talk about it. Okay. Okay.
All right. Anything else, Ruero?
Uh no for consent. So the only item remaining in consent will be PC five, P D D twenty two seven six twenty-one.
Okay.
So we have a mo we have a motion to uh approve the consent agenda as modified.
Motion to approve.
Second. Our motion and second. Any further discussion on the motion? All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Like signed? Okay. Modified consent agenda is approved.