Multi-agency criminal justice information system funding dispute
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Nov 9, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Nov 9, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 6m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 47 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Yes, Mr. Chairman Mariano. On October 27th, I sent a letter to this board asking the county to reconsider its decision to fully fund the multi-agency criminal justice information system and the annexed courthouse local requirement. I have not received a response. It was not on and a it was not on the agenda as an item for today's meeting. And no commissioner has brought it up for discussion as of yet. The clerk's office budget adopted by the board is inadequate, having
exhausted all other Available options to resolve the budgetary funding dispute with the county. My office is left with no alternative. but to ask the court for clarification of the statutory obligation. And the funding requirements as presented to this board. I am confident that the budget request submitted by my office is supported by law. And commissioners, this is not the conversation I hope to have. The
last thing I want to do is involve the courts in our dispute, and I don't want to take the board to court, but I must do the right thing for my office and the citizens of Pasco County. As the board is not willing to discuss an auspicious resolution for the clerk's office, a petition for declaratory and supplemental relief will be filed. Um those are my comments, Mr. Chairman. Okay.
Mr. Chairman Mariano.
Just a question then. So if you look at the twenty twenty one um budget request, there was no local requirement in there listed at all. So so my question then, there was no local requirement listed in the 21 budget. But there was one listed in the twenty two. So why was there not one in twenty one?
The um budget that was put in for twenty one, um, I had not gone through the statutes as of yet and the pandemic occurred. in March of that year and really Hurt clerk statewide. And at the time that I submitted the budget, um, I spoke with the county administrator and said, We are going to be doing a deep dive into Florida statutes to determine our revenue sources and figure out if there is an issue with
the revenue coming in, which we have done and the results of that deep dive into Florida statutes has the local requirement in the budget for 2022.
So my question then would be Why wasn't it this done prior? Because you were the chief deputy in 21.
Right.
But nobody from years prior. Ever thought to put that in the budget?
Right. That would be a question for the uh prior elected officials that were in this position. I can't answer that question for you.
Okay, but you being chief deputy would have you would have been involved in the pro budgeting process. Right,
but they said the direction of the office.
The yes, that person does set the d uh direction of the office. So I guess my question would be then Who was the quote, budget director for that office that year. I know who it is, but who was the budget director?
The budget director during that time was Chris Mettler.
Okay. And who's the who was it the next year?
So twenty one was Chris. Twenty two was Chris?
Yes.
Okay. So did his direction change Oh
sorry, Christine Mettler.
Okay. Okay.
No, um this was um A re a review of the statutes.
But it wasn't an it wasn't a necessity for your budget in years prior and your budget then then the budget was fine. Or the prior I'll say the prior clerks.
I gotta tell you our budget has not been fine. Our budget has not been fine for years.
I j I just I just you know just again, you weren't there, you said, but you know, I just find it ironic in twenty one that request wasn't made and priors wasn't made, but all of a sudden it's being now and it's, you know, the end of the world, but it wasn't prior to that. So I well I'll leave it at that.
You know, it always has been an issue and I believe prior clerks went to the legislators and I am looking at the law and the law says that the counties required to pay for the things that I've asked for. That's why I'm asking.
Were they paid for in twenty one? In twenty and nineteen and eighteen through your budget?
Uh as a local requirement from the county? No.
No, w was it paid through through your office though?
Yeah. It was paid from by other clerks in other counties.
But it was paid for.
by other clerks. As a s it's asking my neighbor to pay my bills.
Which worked out fine for all those years though.
Yeah. The money is tight statewide. They are all all looking um at budget deficits.
But we stepped the so the county stepped up with our money and actually passed through and gave you relief.
The CARES Act money, yes. We did.
Okay.
So is it in your budget
to pay that money back in the future to the county?
No, no, I d I don't believe it is. It was um a request that I made. I don't think I could pay that money back if you even if you asked. I don't have the money. But it was um a money, money that the county was granted from the federal government.
Or the correct for the county.
For the county.
Board of County Commissioners.
That's correct. Ninety six million.
So I guess I just you know that's my question is if it wasn't you know uh that was my question. If it was in it wasn't a twenty one, it wasn't a nineteen, it wasn't eighteen, it wasn't seventeen, sixteen, fifteen, fourteen.
All
right,