Addendum 95 PVAS discontinue and program maintenance
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 25, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 25, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 89% of 28 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
No ma'am, sorry. No ma'am, you have an addendum item ninety-five, that's the R of the PVAS that y'all continued from the
Okay. Uh this item was previously advertised uh when heard on December the seventh and continued to this date.
Who's uh speaking on it?
This is the agenda but item we've heard before. We had some objection to it from some commercial people and pretty much everybody on this assessment was gonna be commercial. Oh yes, sir. It was going to be look at different alternatives. I think everybody's been briefed through staff and I'll uh I'm going to make a motion we approve the paving assessment but do it through program maintenance.
Yeah, that's for resolution. Do the PVASP, but that we will do it through program maintenance.
Uh is this the so the is this a public hearing?
It was a continued hearing. But you had a complete public
hearing. I just don't have to ask if there's anyone who wants to comment on it. That's
all. It's uh it's an advertised public hearing, so you you may want to ask if there's somebody
Does anyone wish to speak to this item?
Well
Well, okay.
We're gonna be in favor. Do you wanna but do you still wanna speak on it?
You're against it.
We're rocking and rolling. Okay. Did I have a motion on a second?
Actually, Madam Chair, if if I could, I've I've been instructed here by Ainsley that we have to actually discontinue the PVAS, and then of course, if that could be just part of the motion that we have
to motion to discontinue the PVAS.
Second.
So are we voting on the motion to discontinue first?
Yes.
Okay. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Okay.
And then direct us to do the maintenance on it using program maintenance like we do.
You are directed to pave it with program maintenance. So moved.
Second.
All in favor? Aye. Does that require a vote? I don't think it's I think that requires a vote.
Well, it's helpful because it's a the whether or not we use you know our program maintenance funds on local Roads that serve industrial and collector areas is really a policy decision because as board traditionally local roads have been done via via PVAS.
Right. So you're giving us the directions and the ability to go do it with program maintenance dollars. That's that works for us. But because the it's the policy discussion in the past, it helps that that you give us that.
Yeah, as long as you don't need a motion, we're good. Okay. Okay.