P seventy-six Multimodal Transportation Fund transfer to general fund
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 8, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 8, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 74% of 23 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Item P seventy s uh item P seventy six was published in the Tampa Times on May twenty sixth, twenty twenty one.
Uh thank you Mr. Chair. David Goldstein, this is my item. It's this is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending Pasco County Code of Ordinances Chapter Two, Article Six, Division Three, to allow certain portions of the Multimodal Transportation Fund to be transferred to the general fund, providing for other amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for appealer, providing for severality, providing for inclusion in the code, providing an effective date. Commissioners, this is an ordinance that was requested by the county administrator, and it's intended to create more flexibility in the use of the
county's transportation tax increment funds. Currently, these funds can only be used exclusively from mobility fee subsidies, transportation capital, and transportation operation and maintenance expenses. The proposed change would allow these funds to be transferred to the general fund for other public facilities. Services to the extent they're not needed for mobility fee subsidies. The exact amount of this transfer would be determined yearly as part of the budget process. As some of you may know, the villages of Pasadena Hills has its own tax increment
district that is currently also restricted to transportation related costs. This proposed ordinance would also allow the VOPH tax increment funds to be used for non-transportation public facilities and services in VOPH. This proposed change was presented to the VOPH Planning and Policy Committee and the unanimously recommended approval of the change. So with that we're recommending that you waive introduction and approve the ordinance by roll call vote. Well take public comment and then approve the ordinance by roll call vote.
Okay. Madam Clerk, do we have anyone sign up to speak to this item?
I do not have the sign in sheet. Do we have it? Um I do not have any emails for this item and no one signed up for WebEx, but I'm looking to see if anyone is here in person. Thank you.
But no one is here for P 76. Do you
know move for pool?
Wait, could we just verify there's nobody at the kiosk? Or just
there's is anybody at the kiosk?
There is nobody here to keep up for any item.
I'm discussing.
We are able to pull off the uh transit solution for the Tampa Bay area, um the BRT. We will need to But in our share of that money so we should keep an eye on we don't know what that is yet, but
Oh, yes, yes.
The T bar that is even here in the next few months.
Yeah.
question everyone else's
Okay. I agree.
No, you're off
now.
Anyone? No, you're
off. There you go. Is anybody here pub publicly here that did not sign up, would like to speak to this item? Seeing no one I have a motion and a second. All those in favor by roll call vote.
District two, Commissioner Oakley. Five. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Five. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District one, Chairman Oakley.