Consent agenda PC three PC four PC five PC seven
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 7, 2026
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 26 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
The first item we have on consent is PC three, and you'll be sitting as a local planning agency for this item. It's PDE 260356, a comprehensive plan amendment in the name of CPAS twenty-five thirteen Revillo Ranch, providing for a comprehensive plan text amendment to goal flu. Six Pasadena Hills to amend tables PH2, VOPH residential conversion chart, and PH three, VOPH residential conversion chart, and a text amendment to goal flu six land use classifications, millet excuse
me, village mixed use two. This is coming with a recommendation that the local planning agency find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommended. Approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
All right. Mrs. Item is on consent. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?
Okay, next.
Item PC four, you'll be sitting as a local planning agency, and this does have a companion zoning item APC 7. PC four is PDE 260033 in the name of CPA 2501, Palmetto Ridge PD, providing for a comprehensive plan text amendment to sub-area policy flu 7.1.34 Palmetto Ridge. Ridge PD and this is coming with the recommendation that the local planning agency find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Okay, any applicants present? Anyone here to object?
No objection. I think we're moving. Uh C seven.
Yes, sir. A PC seven is the companion to this one. So I'm gonna go a little bit out of order. A PC seven, uh the companion to PC four is PDE twenty six seven eight seven seven, a zoning amendment in the name of Excuse me, a zoning amendment in the name of zoning amendment substantial modification, Palmetto Ridge MPUD, Palmetto Ridge Cattle Company LLC, EPG, Palmetto Ridge Holding LLC. It's a rezoning request from an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to an MPUD master plan. Master Plan Unit Development District to
allow for the development of 2,800 residential dwelling units and 100,000 square feet of commercial uses and associated infrastructure on approximately 3,536 acres located in north-central Pasco County on the north side of State Road 52, approximately 0.5 miles east of the intersection of State Road 52 and Aaron Cutoff. And this is coming with a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners of the proposed substantial modification to the MPD with conditions.
All right. It's the applicant applicant present. You want
here to object? Mr. Chair, I would like to make a comment on this. I don't know if you want to pull it or if you just want me to make my comment. Uh I don't need a staff presentation. Okay. Go ahead and make your comment. So the school district collaborated with the county and the developer on this project and these conditions. They do differ from similar approved MPDs, and we look forward continuing these discussions with the developer regarding the potential acquisition of the school site. Um we believe that the school district Having
schools located within residential developments enable students to walk to school. It reduces traffic congestion and eases the school district's transportation needs. We hope the developer recognizes the value of having a traditional school and what it brings to a community and the varying factors that the school district has to face with that. And we look forward to continuing these conversations when we're working with the developer.
Okay.
So uh the applicant is present and there was no objection, is that right?
Okay. I know we received uh a written objection in our it was emailed to us. I don't know if we need to pull it because No, it again.
Oh, I do need to add I do have an extra partage that I will be submitting to the clerk's office in the county.
Both PC4 and PC7 received late exparts for this item that have also been submitted to the clerk's office.
Okay. So we have uh PC four and a APC seven. Yes, sir. Um
Do I hear a motion on those for consent?
Item PC five is also the it's the last item that we have on consent.
Okay. Go ahead and read that.
Item PC five, you'll be sitting as a local planning agency. It's PDE 250193, a development agreement in the name of Highland Homes, Clayton Properties Group Incorporated, to design, permit, and construct a portion of Hidden Creek Boulevard in exchange for transportation development fee credits in the village of Pasadena Hills. And this is coming with a recommendation for approval. To find the proposed development agreement consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. And that's the last item on consent.
Okay. So do I have a motion on consent items?
So motion to approve the consent agenda consisting of PC three, PC four, PC five, and APC seven. Okay.
I second that motion.
We have a second. Any further discussion? If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Those like sign. Okay.