Public comment on mask mandate and county issues
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 8, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 8, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 41m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 42% of 139 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Now's time for public comment. Uh citizens are given the opportunity to comment on Any item coming before the board or Public comment section. On this public comment section. The board also takes public comment on items placed on future board agendas and other business under their preview. Due to the COVID nineteen operation. Um Operations to safeguard the well being
and safety of our citizens and staff. Today's public comment will be handled as follows. First. We will take public comment from those that have pre registered at the WebEx link and are currently Um cube. after we will read the uh into the record public comments Documents. PowerPoints, videos. Uh
that have been Id identified m by members, the public to be read. Out loud. Played at the meeting. and were received and and filed. Finally we will have take public coming on Those currently signed up at the Kia station.
Okay.
So oh
Commissioner Yeager. Uh Not to exceed over three minutes. This new format does not waive any requests that when
you address the board. Comments are not directed personally against a commissioner Team member. But rather directed to the issues. This provides Mutual respect between the board members and the public. For WebEx and Keoks recipients after Stating your name and address support.
I start a countdown. After two minutes. One beat was sound Letting you know that you have one minute remaining. After the time is is up, two beeps will sound and your three minutes are up and you should finish your comments.
uh disconnected when they're f time is up and kioks participants will be asked to move Away from the kihawks. Madam Clerk, do we have anyone sign up to speak on WebEx?
Uh we had two people signed up but they um did not connect so there's no one in the WebEx queue.
So there's no comments coming to us from the WebEx.
We go on to
Here we are here. Mr. Chairman M while your script indicates that we do the videos and um uh emails to be read into the record, I would suggest you take the kiosk and see if there just so that we don't have a duplication so that anybody at the kiosk kiosk makes their comments and then we'll and then go on the videos and and emails.
We do have um individuals at the kiosks.
Okay.
Um I think Kayla will be able to speak to them, but I do have their names
Okay. So the first person to speak at the kiosks if you would step forward. Please give us your name and address before speaking. Good morning.
Uh my name is uh Joseph. Pass the MC. I live in the Key Vista subdivision at uh [address removed]. In [address removed]. I live in the 55 plus community, so I am a senior. My concern is that our roadway system is entirely private. We pay. Tens of thousands
of dollars in taxes.
That's for bad. And we don't receive any services. Is that fair? Is that fair to the people who pay these taxes to get not even any kind of maintenance on our roadways, but we don't get security as well. We don't get the sheriffs involved. We have to provide our own security. I tried to find out information this morning by going to the public works department And I couldn't get into the building.
Because the administrator said that you can't enter the building. So we're having a conversation outside in forty-five degree temperature, Jamie Morales and myself. because of the m the administrators policy decision preventing people from entering the building.
And the third issue here is that we're planning to connect with the trail crossing that's located on Bailey's Brive.
That will require a hundred foot of sidewalk on the south end and on the east end and on the west end of Key Vista Boulevard. Kevin The amount of money we spend take care of our own room, which we're now being asked to have to pay for this sidewalk. on both the east and west ends of just the boulevard, which seems to be unreasonable. Considerable given the county without services from the county. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
Thank you.
Okay.
Next.
Can
I ask
a quick question before I start? She has to state her name and address for the record.
State your name and address for the record.
Well that
Tammy Deloitte.
I was wondering if you all got an opportunity to read the information in the booklets I gave you last meeting.
I believe we've all received that information.
I don't know. Have you had a chance to look at it?
Yeah.
You
claim the mask mandate is in place you because you go off of this what the experts say, the C D C. I cannot say that the C D C is lying because their numbers of total deaths are not a lie.
Uh the deaths in twenty twenty being lower than the total deaths in the year twenty eighteen, twenty seventeen is not a lie.
Now here's A new headline after mounting evidence that F D A. C D C Now admit that the coronavirus tests are faulty. FDA acknowledges false positive increase increase as the actual cases go down. The FDA stated that the accuracy of the rapid test depends almost totally on the amount of COVID-19 in the population being tested. As disease prevalence decreases, the
percentage of test results. That are false positive increases. This is truly insulting to any intelligent person to say such a ridiculous thing. This only lead My whole fight here is I want the masks off my daughter. They are in masks for six hours a day. It's common sense that a child's brain needs oxygen to the brain. It's causing brain damage, dental issues. I mean, mentally, physically, and
the children are not even affected by this. I know that you all know this. You might be able to send your kids or grandkids to home school or private schools where they don't have to wear them. At least Let them only wear them in the hallways. They're in masks for six hours.
Your grandchildren, I mean Come on, please. Like. I would pull my daughter out, but she really wants to go to school to be with her friend. Like this is so, I'm just so frustrated by this. And I get three minutes to state my case and you guys won't even look at the science I spent hours putting together for you.
Mr. Chairman M if I can address the speaker, the administrator's order on masks It
goes to the school superintendent, but they will listen to you guys if you spit too. It's
not uh it doesn't apply to the schools. The schools have their own Regulations.
Yes, but if the commissioners, you know, drop it the chance that they will will be more likely. I mean you guys have influence over that.
My child my child's health is at risk. I'm a holistic health coach. It should be my decision. Okay. anyone, like our health is our decision. It's not your place to say what I feel sh I should Dude, for my health.
I mean well it's against the constitution.
I uh I believe in holistic health. Do you guys believe in allopathic health? I mean it should be my choice.
Thank you for your comments.
Name and address for easy.
My name is Janine Dembrowski. My address is [address removed] and [address removed]. I am here today to remind you that we the people are still demanding you put an end to this harmful mask mandate. I am speaking on behalf of the people of Pasco County whom you are harming with this unconstitutional, ineffective, devastating mandate. These unsanitary face diapers are not just a litter problem, but cause
long-term health problems. There are no facts that the use of a cloth or paper mask helps in any way unless you are a surgeon and they are to protect the Patient. Mass are a false sense of security for the ignorant, virtue signaling. They induce an unwarranted fear in the public on efficacy of mass is criminal due to the harm they actually cause. Putting children in masks is child abuse. We
the people see the lot of you walk around maskless maskless, not social distancing. Clearly you all must agree on my body, my choice. Yeah, Wore an oath under God to uphold the Florida Constitution, and you prayed to the same God that gave us all unalienable rights, which includes body autonomy. I will leave you today confident that we the people have been heard, and you will all
agree to end this nonsense today.
The Department of Justice recently issued a statement of interest briefed to support a church's lawsuit against a city for constitutional ovary. The brief stated: there is no pandemic exception. However, to the fundamental liberties, the Constitution safeguards indeed. Individual rights secured by the Constitution do not disappear during a public health crisis. These individual rights, including the protection in the Bill of Rights, made applicable to the states
through the 14th Amendment, are always enforced. And restrain government action. No government authority can force you to do anything is harmful. To our own health, wearing a face mask limits free speech and expression. The truth is never was about a virus. This is about the global reset and the plan of Bill Gaze. Thank you.
Thank you for your comments. Uh Mr. Bayliff, with you um Make sure there's no uh talking outside 'cause we're getting uh override of people trying to be giving us their comments and it's interrupting them. Name and address, please.
Ah, there there's no one else signed up for the kiosk.
Nobody else. I was gonna let you speak, so all right, thank you. Um Now we should go into um The videos and you want to do the videos first and then do the emails, read the emails into the
Sure. Um there were no emails to be read, just to be filed. So we just have videos. There are one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, nine videos, Todd. Okay. So um we'll play them for three minutes each. Before each video, I'll state who um sent them in and their address that works. Okay. All right. So the first video is from Cindy Bontrager at [address removed]. Thank you.
According to my research, unlike Pinellas and Hillsboro Counties, every member of the Pasco Board of County Commissioners is a Republican. I would like to remind you what the twenty twenty Republican Party platform says. The Republican Party is the party of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The Declaration sets forth the fundamental precepts of American government: that God bestows certain inalienable rights on every individual, thus producing human equality, that government
exists first and foremost to protect those inalienable rights, that man-made law must be consistent. with God given natural rights, and that if God given natural inalienable rights come in conflict with government, core, or human granted rights, God given natural, inalienable rights always prevail. American government is to operate with the consent of the governed.
The Republican Party twenty twenty platform regarding the First Amendment Amendment and Religious Liberty quotes Thomas Jefferson, No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority. Republicans pledge to defend the religious beliefs and rights of conscience of all Americans.
Knowing what you have pledged to stand for to the Pasco County
Knowing what you have pledged to stand for to the Pasco County residents who voted for you should prompt you to consider the decision you have made to order the community to wear a mask. The order violates God given natural rights because it is based on a man made theory that is controversial. Therefore, God given natural rights must always prevail. Additionally, the only law in the state of Florida regarding communicable disease is that schoolchildren are required to be vaccinated, but even this law recognizes a religious objection of conscience
and provides an exemption for those that the law conflicts with their religious beliefs. If this board will not recognize the
Knowing what you have provides an exemption for those that the law conflicts with their religious beliefs. If this board will not recognize the mask order violates what Republicans stand for, a religious exemption should be added to the order for those who believe it violates their religious tenets or practices. After all, if a vaccine can violate religious beliefs, masks can as well.
In closing, we all know that viruses and communicable disease have been around for a very long time. In fact, masks were controversial in the 1900s during the Spanish flu. Yet in a hundred years there hasn't been a published peer-reviewed study proving their efficacy. This is in spite of local, state, and federal governments all spending tons of taxpayer funds to create emergency management divisions and detailed plans that include communicable disease. In closing with
Okay. The next video, Kimberly Newland at [address removed]. Thank you.
And we don't know what the outcome of those things are. There is uh one study I came across that actually looks at how well masks work uh for preventing spread of the flu. And they looked at uh no masks, they looked at uh medical masks like the N ninety five, and they looked at makeshift cloth masks, which is what a lot of people are using right now. And in that study, and it wasn't very conclusive because the uh the conf confidence intervals o
overlapped one on the relative risk. So that means that it wasn't very strongly powered statistically. So you should take the results with a grain of salt because it might the result might be actually that there's no difference between any of the masks or no masks. But what the main conclusions of the study were is that the group that wore the cloth masks actually had a higher rate of getting the flu. than wearing no mask or wearing the uh medically produced mask. So
if if you take that seriously then then what you would say is that people wearing cloth masks now actually are increasing their risk of getting sick. So it definitely goes against uh the common uh wisdom. My main uh criticism, uh prima facie of the masks, aside from the psychological and social consequences. is that the pore size of the mask is a one to two orders of magnitude larger than the size of a viral particle. So
a virus particle is about 100 nanometers, according to what they say about uh this alleged COVID uh virus. And um the pore size of the mask, an N95 mask, is on the order of microns or micrometers. So Um it'd be one to two orders of magnitude difference. So it would be like if you uh were trying to walk through a door and that door was a hundred feet high and a hundred feet wide. it wouldn't really stop you. Uh someone else made an analogy that
if you put a chain link fence uh around your garden to keep out mosquitoes. Right? Uh there's no chance that it would work. So so I think these masks are for uh another purpose and I think it's to uh separate people from each other, alienate people from each other. I mean if we look um in our society who would wear a mask like this, um aside from a surgeon, it would actually be someone who is a criminal who is trying to hide their identity.
All right, the next video is from Tod Todd Bontrager and he resides at [address removed], uh [address removed].
So without further ado, let's cut to the chase and take a look at an ordinary surgical mask and I'm using a vape. As you can see, that vape, which has aerosols the same size as COVID nineteen or larger goes through and around a surgical mask. Now if we take a cup mask and have a good look at it, Here we go. Notice it goes right through the mask easily
and goes in every direction. The aerosol is not affected by the mask in any material form. Now we look at a surgical mask with a foam strip to protect above and keep my glasses from fogging. Lo and behold The aerosols go all around it. has no effect on me spreading aerosols to you. Now a cloth mask I borrowed from my wife. Once again Here we go. Boom straight through and around. It
has no effect. on the spread of aerosols. They go everywhere. And then I went and bought a guard mask with a high efficiency filter material That one? Here we go. Watch for it.
through and around. It had no effect on the vape aerosol, which remember is the same size or larger. Now, I don't have an N ninety five mask. I have these shop respirators where they can put all kinds of things in 'em, but they're like an N ninety five because when you breathe out Everything goes out through a valve. Guess what? It might protect me from you. It sure isn't gonna protect you from me. Let's look at
that again. Boom. Any mask with a button on it has a valve that lets everything go from you to your neighbor. It has no effect on anything. I think you can get the picture now. There is absolutely nothing that any of these masks do. to protect you from me. And the fact is Vit. Unless I have a mask which is fully sealed. And
where I breathe through the filter material both directions. And I have a really high quality film.
Nothing. is going to protect in either direction.
Because just the same way that the vape went out, around and And through the It will come in around and through. Air is sold. will not be stopped by man.
The next video is from Hannah Gleason at [address removed].
It seems very simple. Everyone is fighting over this issue of face masks right now. In fact, in the state of Michigan, Governor Gretchen Whitmer has issued an executive order that tells businesses they must force customers to wear a face mask. And if they don't, the owner of that business could lose their license to operate in the state of Michigan. All over the country, we're seeing signs, people saying you must wear a face mask. Governors are mandating it, and even President Trump himself wore a face mask at a Navy hospital recently. It is all anyone talks about right now. And as I said, there are very strong feelings about This issue, as with everything else. But if we set aside feelings and we just look at facts, what do the facts say about wearing a face mask? What does
science say about face masks and whether or not they prevent the spread of viruses like COVID-19? Believe it or not, there have been a number of studies that have been done over the past decade. One in 2009, 2010, 2012, 2016, 2017, 2019, and yes, even this year in 2020, a number of controlled studies have been done that look at this very issue. Wearing medical face masks with N95 respirators in them, and whether or not wearing cloth masks actually reduced the risk of a virus. So, what did each of these studies find? Well, actually, they all found the very same thing. Now, these were studies that looked at N95 respirator
masks. That's not the same thing as just hanging a piece of cloth over your face or creating your own mask at home. We'll get to that in a minute. But let's start with the most scientific and medically advanced mask, the N95 respirator mask. These studies control Studies took a look at those in 95 respirator masks and whether or not they prevent the spread of virus. Here's what they found. For the study in 2019, among 2,862 randomized participants, 2,371 completed the study and accounted for 5,180 HCW healthcare workers seasons. Among outpatient healthcare personnel, in 95 respirators versus medical masks,
as worn by participants in this trial, resulted, get this, in no significant difference in the incidence of Laboratory confirmed influenza. Did you get that? In the 2019 study, there was no significant difference by wearing an N95 respirator mask. It happened again in 2020. Look at this one. A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respiratory. And surgical
masks. By the way, just to be clear, in the 2009, 2010, 2012, 2016, and 2017 studies, they all found the very same thing as the 2019 and 2020 studies. Again, all of these are RTCs, randomized controlled tests, that are essentially set up to determine whether or not these N95 respirator masks help to prevent the spread of viruses in this setting. And all of these studies found that they do not. Statistically, they do not. Now there's another study that was also done in 2020. It was done by a group of researchers in Hong Kong. The study was conducted. Just before COVID-19, hysteria took over, and the results of it were released just a few weeks ago. And once again, those researchers found the very same thing: that there was,
in fact, no statistical reason to believe that face masks will protect you, but improper use of the face mask actually puts you at greater risk of contamination. Look at this. In polled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission. And there is more here, because remember, over and over we've been told something else that's pretty significant. We have been told that you must wear a face mask.
Okay, the
The next video is from Natalie Cronin. Address is [address removed].
This is the most important thing you can do right here, more important than a vaccine. What does this make you think about this country and where our information is coming from?
Well, the first thing was I thought to myself was this has to do with some sort of lobbying. This has to do with social engineering. I could not wrap my head around how we've had OSHA's respiratory protection program in place as law since 1979. So this is not new for people like us. And when you have people who are not credentialed in this law or the science behind the map. And it's not just about degrees, it's not just about the law. We've been in the field. I've seen nurses faint. I've seen surgeons have
to walk out of rooms because it was too much. And those are controlled environments. So all I thought was We are completely removing decades worth of data. For a political agenda. That's the only thing I can tie it to. And I just wish that more professionals came forward because not only is this not going to decrease the spread of infectious disease, this will increase the numbers. And think back to the culture of Asian countries. When they had the SARS outbreak, they started masking up. We have data from that time. And then it became from
information I have found is it was cultural and they they were fashion statements. So why was there COVID-19 outbreaks over there when they had already been en masse?
That's a good point. So then here's the obvious question: the elephant in the room. Where is OSHA? I mean, the entire purpose of OSHA, this is right in their wheelhouse.
To make sure that anyone wearing a mask is safe, and I haven't seen anyone on CNN, anyone on MSNBC, where is OSHA saying, hey, if this is the this is what we did with with Eber, this is what you're saying is too high a CO2 level. My this mask is off the charts for my kids. So someone wanted to explain to me from OSHA how this is safe. Where are they?
Well, we would like to know the same thing. We have been saying The same thing. We have been screaming it loudly. In fact, we've talked about it. We'll probably lose all of our OSHA credentials. I'm being audited right now by OSHA because I'm being very vocal and I'm speaking out because this is just simply wrong. This agency was created to protect workers in the workplace. Now they are enforcing on employers that employers are to be the mask police and force their employees to do something that we know by the data and the test that we. We have is not only unsafe, but it's very unhealthy. It will create
long-term health effects. That oxygen deprivation over long periods, not only is it immediately you have that acute immediate issue with headaches and fatigue and nausea and things like that, but you're creating long-term health effects too. When you deprive the body of oxygen for a long period of time, it reduces immune function, it causes cancer to be able to grow and thrive, a more acidic environment. Because you're increasing also the CO2, which has causes hypercapnia and all of that. So where is OSHA? Why are they turning completely now and and saying, Oh well,
this is we know that this is a hazardous environment, and so they're lumping it under that. You know, we have an infectious disease, this is a hazardous environment. So in order to protect everybody, we have to do
The next video um is two videos from Tim Kurup. And resides at [address removed].
Again, a good question. And what is now to Evolving. Into a bit of a standard that if you get a cycle threshold Of thirty five or more. that the chances of it being replication competent are minuscule. So that if somebody and you know we do, we have patients, and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in And they repeat. their PCR and it's like thirty seven
Cycle threshold. But you never if you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say, you know, it's just it's just dead nucleotides, period. Right. Again, a good question. And what
There this will be the greatest economic hit. But you don't have a choice. People act like you have a choice. People don't feel like going to the stadium uh when they might get infected. You know, it it's not the government who's saying, Okay, just ignore this disease, and you know, people are deeply affected. by seeing these deaths, by knowing they could be part of the transmission chain and old people, uh, their parents, their grandparents could be affected
by this. And so you don't you know, you don't get to say uh ignore uh what's going on here. There are there will be the ability, particularly in rich countries, to open up if things are done well over the next few months. But But for the world at large, normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.
All right, the next video is from Michael Malicos, [address removed].
Take a look at it. In the relationship between April and now, October, is the infection rate. The tests that show positive for being infected with COVID-19. So between these two dates in the US, it is increased by 2x, doubled initially. It looks very, very scary. Things are spreading, right? The virus is spreading. Well, this is only scary if you omit this column right here. And this is the number of tests that were done between April and October. So let's just take a look at what's going on right here. In the US, between April and October. We did six point five times more testing.
Okay. You're gonna get more positive tests, right? Now let me just explain another thing. It's called the positivity rate. Okay. The positivity rate is how high The virus is transmitting, how high it's spreading around. And you basically take the positive test divided by the number of tests. We actually get a posity rate of three times less, actually between March and October. It means the transmission of this virus is three times less. So when you hear all these new cases going up and more people are testing positive, you must not omit this data right here. As well as
this data right here. So you got that? All right, let's shift over to the actual death rate between April and October. We take a look at the US. We have a death rate of three times less than it was. This is the country where they didn't do the strict lockdown. And everyone was concerned about this. They thought it was gonna become a real big problem, but take a look at this. Between April and October, the positive infections went down. by one point seven times, despite having testing that was up by two X. So we did twice as much testing, but we got a one point seven times less positive infection
rate. But check this out. Overall there's been a drop in deaths by thirty X between April and October. This is significant. What does this mean in their economy because of it? Why has the death rate dropped so low? Now, is it because people are becoming exposed and getting antibodies? Well Only one-fifth of the population has antibodies to COVID-19. So you would think that talks about why the death rates have dropped so much. It has to do with another way that the body becomes immune to a virus. It's called a
memory T cell. I haven't talked about this in other videos. One of the mechanisms that the memory T cell uses is called cross-reactivity. So for example, there are several types of coronaviruses out there. One would be the common cold. So let's say you've got the cold. Or three or four years ago. Because all of these coronaviruses are very similar DNA wise, they're like ninety percent Similar, you're gonna develop some immunity to COVID-19 if you're exposed to a previous coronavirus. In fact, what they're finding is that 50 to 60 percent of the population has this type
of immunity to COVID-19 through cross-reactivity, which is fascinating. And this is very important because when you're evaluating something, you never look at one number, you compare it with something else. The reason why the death rate is so low is because. our bodies have another way of creating immunity that goes beyond just the antibodies. It's called the memory T cells. All this information can be verified in some really credible sources down in the description box. Check it out.
The next video is from Susan Robinson. [address removed].
And I'm not a medical scientist, but I tell you what, I listened to what the science says. The C D C at the beginning of this pandemic said that most Americans will get the virus. What do you have to say about that? That's what the C D C said. And you know what? For ninety-nine point seven percent of the cases, it's not fatal. It's something you get and you get over with. Sickness is is part of life, it's part of the social contract. We agree to live amidst pathogens and try to live with dignity. And human rights and freedoms anyway. I don't understand why we have these medium mouthpieces like the my interlocutor
here, who's who seems to be celebrating wreckage, massive social and international, economic, cultural wreckage that is particularly hitting the poor very badly because of a pathogen that ultimately we not we cannot control. Uh I don't know where do you think the virus is gonna go if we hide. and mask up and stigmatize people who have it as if they're behaving badly. This is a medieval and grotesque attitude. I'm just about had it with this. This has been going on for seven months. So yes, I was great relieved that we finally
got a few truth Um But Jeff
Jeffrey, don't you think uh the idea is not to hide ourselves, the idea is to wait for a vaccine to
come out. No, no, no, no. We have a flu vaccine and guess what? It's only thirty percent effective and it's still it's a massive killer, especially if young people. Unlike I should say the coronavirus. Flu is very deadly and very dangerous, and it's guess what? It's been with you your whole life. Do you hide under your bed every flu season? Some people probably should, the vulnerable populations. That's called good public health thinking. Waiting for a vaccine that is going to be untested. You know, vaccines can take as many as 10 or 15 years to develop. We have no
idea if this thing is going to be effective or not. And guess what? I just talked to the world's top epidemiologist two days ago. You know what she told me? I want you to listen to me. Listen to me as I tell you this. She told me that naturally acquired immunities are far more safe and effective than vaccines, especially untested ones. What do you think about that? What that means is get it, get immunities. When Trump said he was probably immune, he's not incorrect. So let's start thinking about serious issues like human rights, human dignity, and freedoms again and start treating
disease as it should be, as a medical property.
All right, this is the last video from Forrest Spahl. At [address removed].
There is a gentleman, one of the leading uh people opposing, one leading voices opposing s these lockdowns and there's many of them around the world now, doctors, scientists, researchers. But this is Dr. Michael Yeiden. Let's listen to what he has to say and maybe give some balance to this conversation.
Hello, I'm Dr. Mike Eden. I have a PhD in biological sciences and 32 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. I believe that the pandemic in UK concluded at the end of the summer. I think that because about 30% of us had prior immunity to the virus and slightly over thirty percent more have become immune, having been infected and recovered. If that's true, then there are too few remaining
susceptible people to support the kind of outbreak that we're told is now going on. So there's a problem. I think the PCR test at present is throwing up so many false positives that in fact we miss diagnosing the cause of the deaths that are being reported. The number of deaths occurring at the moment is normal. for the time of year.
Amazing. I mean there when when you read those headlines they say there's no alternative. No, there's tens of thousands of scientists saying what Eden is saying here. You've got this dead wrong. This makes no sense. We have normal deaths. We aren't over the top anymore. This virus may very well be gone, which if you talk to some people that I know, we you you know, family members and things, if they're watching CNN and MSNBC, they are bracing themselves for the greatest carnage of all times. Yet great
scientists that worked for Pfizer like this guy for their entire lives are saying, it's not even there, folks. This doesn't doesn't exist. It's over. Amazing. It's amazing that these two Like I've said before, it's like two di Different work Worlds. We live in two
different worlds now.
Yeah.
And it shows these presidents have been briefed, these leaders have been briefed across the countries. They know what's going on with their economy. Seeing the contractions and for the second ordered lockdown to happen and even a discussion about a third with no exit strategy. We have to we have to uh implore these people to end these these hard lockdowns. They're They're totally counterproductive. The science shows it now, just like Dr. Eden has said, it's it's false positives on tests and no transparency.
Like that
clip, then be sure to check out
That's
it.
Uh Chairman M that is it for the videos and again no one is on WebEx. So nobody's on WebEx. And there's no emails to read into the record.
Uh now concludes public comment. portion of the meeting and we will uh move to the consent agenda.