Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
Not on the published agendaConsent agendaInferred

P-7 PDD-240010 site plan appeal continuance

What the county recorded

This item is not from the published agenda

It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Oct 5, 2023

The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Oct 5, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 15 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Denise

Mr. Chair, we're gonna move on to item seven.

P7 is PDD 240010. It's an appeal of the Planning and Development Director approval of a site plan. The applicant has requested a continuance to the November 2nd, 2023 Planning Commission meeting at 13 in Dade City. And as I understand, the owner of the property is in agreement with that. I'm seeing one state.

Charles Grey

All right. Is the applicant present?

Okay. Anyone here to object?

Jon Moody

Mr. Chair, if you could just ask if anybody wants to speak to the item at all. It was not noticed as a continuance.

Charles Grey

Okay.

Jon Moody

So if somebody's here that cannot make the continuance date, this would be their chance to

Charles Grey

speak. All right. So is there anyone here t that came to speak on item P seven?

Denise

And for the record I do sa have someone on WebEx but it's actually the applicant who has agreed to the who wants asking for the petitions. I'm sorry, it's uh it's

Charles Grey

actually who

Denise

The person who I have on WebEx is the a is the applicant who has agreed to the continuance.

Charles Grey

Okay, great. Okay. So any further discussion of the continuance? I hear a motion. So moved.

Connected City

Second.

Charles Grey

Yeah.

Not all in favor signify by saying aye. Motion carries.