Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
Not on the published agendaPublic hearingInferred

Fire Municipal Service Taxing Unit millage rate

What the county recorded

This item is not from the published agenda

It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 3, 2025

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 3, 2025

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 79% of 39 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Unidentified speakerVoice A

I will now provide a summary of the Fire Municipal Service Taxing Unit Budget stating the tentative millage rate, the percentage change from the rolled back rate, and the reasons for the change. The Fire Municipal Service Taxing Unit Fund has a recommended tax levy of 2.1225 MLs. This represents a 5.62% increase from the rolled back rate of 2.0096. Taxable values. for this municipal service taxing unit increased 11.7%. The increase in property value results in

an additional $12.5 million in property tax revenue. The additional revenue will be used to fund wage increases for the firefighter union, four additional emergency medical services supervisors, and four additional fire arson investigators. I would ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on the Fire Municipal Service Taxing Unit Fund, military, and associated budget. The minimum vote for this tentative hearing is a simple majority or three votes. However, it will be a minimum of four votes for the final public hearing. Yeah.

Okay.

StarkeyChair

Does anyone wish to speak to the board regarding the Fire Municipal Service Taxing Unit? Known as an MSTU.

StarkeyChair

I do not have anyone signed up specifically for that one.

StarkeyChair

All right, is there a motion to adopt a military question, Chairman?

WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

So uh my

Is this when rescues rolled up into this?

Mike Carballa

So no not yet. So the the intention is is before the end of this year is to bring back to the board uh changes in the current MSTU language to allow for rescue to roll up as well as the The board directed to bring back a law enforcement NST language as well. So we would bring both of those back. We're targeting about the November timeframe for that. So the the short answer to your question is no, it does not. But next year, when the board comes through and we do law enforcement, we do first

responders. We then can make global changes into how taxes are structured.

Yeager

So so what change are you looking to make with fire that fire MST?

Mike Carballa

FIRE would allow for the rescue component uh to be uh included in the MSTU. Uh right now, currently it comes from your the the difference is made up. It's about a sixty-five, thirty-five split. So the fire budget comes from the general fund because your fire and a system is. The rescue portion. The rescue portion is right. I'm sorry, yes. The rescue portion comes from the general fund. So if we include it in the fire MSTU, it's basically a fire rescue MSTU and encompasses

all services that the fire rescue department covers. So it's no longer coming from two funding sources. The intent would be, I believe it's the board's intent, would be to make the a a commensurate reduction in the general operating millage to account For that movement, and then the fire rescue department will live in its own MSTU fund. Similarly, the sports direction was to come back with a law enforcement MSTU to handle the sheriff's budget and We it would be the same

the same concept.

Yeager

Isn't there uh and I might be getting confused with something else, but on their their rescue side, don't they they lose money on Yes. So then be actually taking

Mike Carballa

money away from them.

So

Yeager

why would we combine that? I I I'm I'm lost.

Mike Carballa

It's not a hundred percent. We we maybe recover a third. of those costs uh through through our bill recovery. So there's still um there's still makeup money that comes from the general fund currently for those operations. They're not wholly they're not They're not fully um

Yeager

Yeah, I'm not a fan of that. Just for the for the

Mike Carballa

fan of moving

Yeager

of combining them.

Mike Carballa

Okay, I mean currently it's subsidized to the general fund or it would be subsidized through the MSTU, um, which which puts pressure on your general fund.

Okay.

StarkeyChair

Well I don't know. I just

Unidentified speakerVoice B

because she's does this doesn't have anything to do with it.

StarkeyChair

Oh yeah, that's okay. That's

Mike Carballa

that's why we're we're separating this. We want to bring this to you guys in November to have the discussion when all things MSTU. So it'd be law enforcement M STU and fire. And we can r we can list out the pros and cons, Commissioner, so I would love to you can make an informed decision on which direction.

StarkeyChair

We would all want pros and cons, yeah. Is

Unidentified speakerVoice B

there a motion?

StarkeyChair

Um did did I already ask if anyone wanted to speak to this?

Yes.

Yes.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

You did? Okay. Did you did

StarkeyChair

anyone get a m give

Unidentified speakerVoice B

me a motion? It would you need to is there a motion to adopt?

StarkeyChair

Yeah. Is there a motion to adopt two point one two two two five mills for the fire M STU?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

So

StarkeyChair

moved. Second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed?