5 in the published record, 3 in the recordingsmatched as an identifier, not as words
In the record
Published agenda5 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
APC3No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda - Oct 8, 2024Board
P47No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road
PC1No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road
- Oct 3, 2024Planning
PC2No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road
PC4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road
In the room
Transcript3 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
- APC3Zoning Amendment – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units (Platted Townhomes and Condominiums), 100,000 Square Feet of Support Commercial, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road
Jon Moody My my problem with that, David, is that when I asked the staff what do I do to make it compatible, they s they couldn't tell me. And so now I'm supposed to do the planning. You can come up with the what's
- PC2Substantial Modification (Continuance) – Riverstone MPUD – KB Homes Tampa LLC – Substantial Modification to Allow the Developer to Receive Certificates of Occupancy for 66 Homes Prior to Completion of Substandard Road Improvements Through Modification of a Previously Approved Condition
Jon Moody The next item is PC two, and this is the companion substantial modification to the previous item, PC five. PDE 25-7838, a substantial modification in the name of Riverstone MPUD, and this is coming with the request to continue the item to the April 17th, 2025 Planning Commission at 1.30 p.m. in Newport Ritchie.
- APC3Zoning Amendment – Evans County Line 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Evans Properties, Inc. – A Rezoning Petition from A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 300 Multi-Family Units (Platted Townhomes and Condominiums), 100,000 Square Feet of Support Commercial, and 1,500,000 Square Feet of Light Industrial Uses on Approximately 80 Acres, Located South of County Line Road North and East of Lake Iola Road
Jon Moody I I understand, but that's never been a reason for a recommendation of denial before and we had a meeting with the sheriff and and and suggested that he submit an impact fee study and that we would consider imposing an impact fee on new development to offset the additional burden of new development on his department. But go ahead. Sure.