Adoption of Tentative Millage Rates and Tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2025 - To Be Distributed
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative budget for Fiscal Year 2025.
13 in the published record, 12 in the recordings
13 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative budget for Fiscal Year 2025.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the final budget for Fiscal Year 2024 with Commissioner Bradford absent from the vote.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative budget for Fiscal Year 2024 with Commissioner Weightman voting nay.
Approved minutesApproved the Resolution adopting the final budget for Pasco County for Fiscal Year 2023.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative budget for Fiscal Year 2023.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the final Budget for Fiscal Year 2022 with Commissioner Starkey absent from the vote.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2022.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the final Budget for Fiscal Year 2021.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2021 by roll call vote.
Approved minutesApproved the Resolution to adopt the final Budget for Fiscal Year 2020.
Approved minutesApproved to adopt the Resolution adopting the tentative Budget for Fiscal Year 2020.
Approved minutesApproved Staff's recommendation with Commissioner Starkey absent from the vote.
12 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
Jack Mariano Chairman, members of the board, the aggregate millage rate being proposed is 9.8433 MLs, which is lower than the aggregate millage rate sent out on trim notices and represents a 1.11%. Increase from the aggregate rolledback rate of 9.7350 MLs. The reason the aggregate millage rate is higher than the rolledback rate is because the total taxable evaluate total taxable value increased between last year and this year. Table one in your handout shows the millage rates for the various county levies and a comparison of the recommended millage rates to the rolledback rates and the prior year adopted millage rates. Rather than read this chart into the record, we have provided copies to each commissioner, board records, and members of the audience. At the first public hearing on the budget, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a budget based upon the millage rates used in the trim notices each property owner received. During the morning board meeting earlier today, the commissioners directed staff to return to the final public hearing with a reduction to the general operating millage of 0.0250
Jack Mariano MLs. I'd like to give a summary of the resulting General Fund and Transportation Trust fund budgets, stating the millage rates, the percentage change from the rolledback rate, and the reasons for such a change. The millage rate for the general fund is 7.4042 MILLs, which is a 3.57% increase from the rolled back rate of 7.1489. This millage rate is a 0.250 mil reduction from last year's millage rate. The county realized an 11.2 percent increase in taxable assessed values over the past year. The increase in property tax values based on the recommended millage rate of 7.4042 mills and the taxable assessed value increase results in an additional $42.1 million in property tax revenue. The additional revenue will in part be used to increase the funding for parks capital maintenance, renovate the Hudson Library, provide operational resources for the expanded detention center, and provide wage increases for all employees. Prior action by the Florida legislator eliminated the requirement
Jack Mariano I will now provide a summary of the nine voter-approved debt service millage rates. These millage rates are levied to repay the debt service for the general obligation bonds to include two tranches each for the jail projects, the parks and recreation projects, and the libraries projects, as well as three tranches for the fire rescue project. The nine individual millage rates are listed on Table One in your handout. Rather than read this chart into the record, we have provided copies to each commissioner, board records, and members of the audience. The total of the nine voter-approved debt service millage rates is 0.2401 MILS. This is a decrease of 0.0316 MILS from the 2024 actual millage rates of 0.2717 ML. I ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on each debt service millitrate. There is no vote requirement for these millages, so a simple majority or three votes is needed.
Jack Mariano I will now provide a summary of the nine voter-approved debt service millage rates. These millage rates are levied to repay the debt service for the general obligation bonds to include two tranches each for the jail project, the parks and recreation projects, and the libraries projects, as well as three tranches for the fire rescue projects. The nine individual millage are listed on Table One in your handout. Rather than read this chart into the record, we have provided copies to each Commissioner, Board Records, and members of the audience. The total of the nine voter-approved debt service millage rates is 0.2188 mils. This is a decrease of 0.0213 mils from the 2025 actual millage rates of 0.2401 mils. I ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on each debt service millagerate. There is no vote requirement for these millage rates, so a simple majority or three votes is needed.
Jack Mariano The Roads Rehabilitation MSTU fund has a recommended tax levy of 0.4052 MLs. This represents a five point three percent increase from the rollback rate of zero point three eight four eight. This millage rate will generate twenty one point six million in property tax revenue to maintain the county's roadway network. I would ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on the roads rehabilitation MSTU Millage Rate. The minimum vote for this final hearing is four votes.
Jack Mariano for a mandatory transportation ad valorem tax. No transportation millage was levied last year, and we propose no millage be assessed this year for the Transportation Trust Fund. I would ask the Board to accept public comment and then vote on the General Fund and the Transportation Trust fund millage rates. The minimum vote required to levy the general fund millage rate is a simple majority or three votes according to maximum millage rate calculations.
Jack Mariano Is there a motion to Were you in a rush? Your last one enjoy this. Trying to return. And this is my favorite one. Is there a motion to adopt a millage rate of 0.0122 MILS for the 2022 A Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Code? Second. All in favor say aye. Any opposed? All
Jack Mariano Okay. We'll close for comment. Is there a motion to approve approve? To adopt a millage let me get I need to finish. Let me finish. Is there a motion to adopt a millage rate of point zero two nine three mills for the two oh one nine A shale facility bond? A question. I moved.
Jack Mariano The Roads Rehabilitation MSTU Fund has a recommended tax levy of 0.4052 MLs. This is the first year that this millage is proposed to be levied, so there is no calculated rolled back rate. This millage rate will generate $19.4 million in property tax revenue to maintain the county's roadway network. I would ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on the roads rehabilitation MSTU millage rate in a Associated budget. Since this is the first time this millage rate will be levied, state statutes indicate that a unanimous vote is required to levy any millage rate.
Jack Mariano Yeah, one of the things I was concerned about with the cities and and the contributions of what happens if that we're gonna do all the contribution for ninety-one percent of the population covering all the fields. I don't think it's right. I think they should contribute. But one comforting thing I got from let's say the Port Ritchie and uh New Port Richey, their C RAs if we reduce the millage down and we're using uh this MSTU instead They're not getting revenue they would have got. That they're gonna go dump into the C R A and it comes into this. So that was a I was trying to think of that Mike as we were talking the other day. I couldn't remember what that argument was, it just came to me a little while ago. But that's the ar that's the one piece where I got even if the cities don't contribute in Um It's gonna still help us in a way where not as much is gonna go to the C R A.
Jack Mariano Yes. We're on the fire municipal service tax and unit. And the next now that public comment is closed, is there a motion to adopt a Millage rate of two point three mills for the fire municipal service taxing unit. I move.
Jack Mariano I will now provide a summary of the other two municipal service taxing unit budgets stating the millage rates, the percentage change from the rollback rate, and the reasons for the change. No millage was levied last year. No mills were adopted during the first public hearing for the Parks Capital Maintenance MSTU fund. I would ask the board to accept public comment and then vote on the Parks Capital Maintenance MSTU millage rate. Since this millage rate is unable to increase at this final public hearing,