PDD-21-7527

Every appearance2 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 81% of 64 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Jul 22, 2021
   Planning CommissionP11Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Zoning Amendment (Regular) – … Development District to Allow for For Additional Uses on the … MPUD on 32.66 Acres (Board of County Commissioners (BCC): 8/24/21; (Planning Commission (PC): 7/22/21; 1:30 p.m.; NPR)

   Open this item →▶ Play from 1:38:28
   ▶ 1:38:286m

   Denise

   1:38:28Mr. Chairman, following item Denise Hernandez Planning and Development. Following item is P11. It's PDD 217527 Causeway MPUD. Before you is a request to rezone a piece of property from an MPUD to an MPUD to allow for additional uses on the property, to allow a land use equivalency matrix and exchange process. And to change the project from Causeway to Causeway. M PUD on 32.66 acres.

   1:38:57Again, proposed before you is to allow a maximum of 275,000 commercial retail square feet and to introduce a land use equivalency matrix. We call them looms with potential additional uses. Potential additional uses are office, medical office, health care-related uses, light industry distribution, multifamily residential, single-family attached residential.

   1:39:23public institutional uses. Um regardless of any uh land use equivalency matrix conversions, the minimum square footage of commercial retail will be a hundred thousand square feet. Residential uses will only be allowed in the parcels abutting 41 if they are part of a vertically integrated mixed-use building. There's also a couple of requests. One is for variation from the Land Development Code, Section 907.1 on street parking. Should mixed-use parcels depicted on the MPUD be developed as a mixed-use trip

   1:39:53reduction methods, mudram project. Then on-site parking for the multifamily apartments, retail, and office within the mixed-use product parcels request to be shared to share the parking and calculated at 1.9 spaces per multifamily apartment. This is actually, this next one is something I'm reading into record. It's not part of your agenda packet, but I do want to read that item into record, and we will include the revisions to the clerk's office. The applicant

   1:40:24is also requesting a variation from the LDC section 700.8. So that the at the applicant developer's risk, a plat may be submitted and the plat process may be commenced prior to the approval of a no-improvement plat, of a preliminary development plan, andor construction plan. The procedures for that process will be approved by the county administrator or designee without requiring an amendment to the Master Plan Unit Development District. This is the proposed master plan.

   1:40:55Um the uh background on this parcel, on January 8, 2008, the Board Board of County Commissioners adopted a Comp Plan amendment from Res 3, residential three-dwelling units for Gross Acre to Comm for the subject property, which became effective April 10, 2008. On December 20, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a rezoning from C2 and AC districts to an MPUD master plan unit development district. And a Complant amendment to change the land use designation from COM commercial to plan development has been concurrently submitted with the MPUD

   1:41:26to allow for uses in addition to commercial retail subject to a land use equivalency matrix exchange. This project is on the west side of 41 and it's outside of the multifamily moratorium, which became effective April 1st, 2021, and it's not constrained by the moratorium restrictions. The LDC specifies the variations from the code may be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners at such time as the MPUD zoning amendment. And as stated, the applicant is seeking parking requirements variation and the variation that I read it to

   1:41:56record regarding the plating process. The proposed subject request was found to be consistent with the LDC, Chapter 400, Section 402.2 zoning amendments, MPUD, and with the applicable provisions of the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan. And uh the Planning and Development Department rec recommends that the Planning Commission um uh recommend approval to the to of approval subject to the conditions as stated in your agenda packet and the variation read into record to the BCC.

   GreyChair

   1:42:27All right. Thank you, Denise.

   Unidentified speaker

   1:42:29Thank you.

   GreyChair

   1:42:31Any applicants present?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:42:41Barbara Will Hight, 6327 Grand Boulevard, New Port Richey Florida, 34655. Excuse me, three, four, six, five, two for the applicant. Um we are in agreement with staff's recommendation. We have been here before. Um this has gone through the full hearing process, three hearings on the Comp Plan amendment to plan development that was required in order to bring forward the MPUD. The comp plan, the MPD mirrors the comp plan and also adds the requirements regarding

   1:43:11the reserving 100,000 square feet of commercial, making sure the frontage along 41 is only non-residential unless it's verily integrated, and making sure there's a minimum of 5.7 acres provided. Um along. forty one in any event of how the property ultimately develops. The Board of County Commissioners adopted the Comp Plan amendment and we're here for the rezoning. I have my team available. Um if you have any questions.

   GreyChair

   1:43:38Okay. Um is there anyone here to object?

   1:43:43I don't see anyone. Any questions from the DAS?

   GirardiVice Chair

   1:43:48I I just had one very old this formality question, but in the in the conditions of approval references of Landus equivalency matrix is exhibit A. Um I didn't see that in the agenda package.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:44:04We're just making sure you're paying attention. Sure,

   GirardiVice Chair

   1:44:06right.

   GreyChair

   1:44:07Um He always is,

   GirardiVice Chair

   1:44:09uh I I figured it would make it in there before it went to the board, but I just didn't see it. So I'm sure it's the standard equivalent to matrix.

   Denise

   1:44:15It is, yes.

   GirardiVice Chair

   1:44:16Pop on.

   1:44:19Yeah.

   Denise

   1:44:19Noted, thank you.

   GirardiVice Chair

   1:44:22I'll make a motion to approve. A second.

   GreyChair

   1:44:26Okay, we have a motion to approve. We have a second. Uh any further discussion? All in favor of the motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Motion carries.

   1:44:49Okay. I think we're on to twelve.

   Denise

   1:44:55Yes, sir. Just bringing up the powerboard.

2. 2Aug 24, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP94Public hearingApproved

   Approved minutes

   Approved Staff’s recommendation.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 47:43
   ▶ 47:437m

   StarkeyVice Chair

   47:43Item P ninety four was published in the Tampa Bay Times on June 30th, 2021.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   47:49Good afternoon, Tammy Snyder, Planning and Development. P94 is the Causeway in PED, PDD 217527. Here's a location map. It is just on the southwest of Lendo Lakes Boulevard and Roaches Run and Causeway Extension is on the south side. Proposed as a rezoning request from an MPUD to an MPUD to allow a maximum of 275,000 commercial retail square feet and introduce a land use equivalency matrix with potential additional uses. Those

   48:20uses are office, medical office, healthcare related, light industry distribution, multifamily residential, single-family attached residential, senior retirement assisted.

   48:35The applicant also proposes to change the name of the MPUD from Causeway Center Commercial MPUD to just Causeway MPUD to better reflect what the potential uses would be. And variation requests from the LDC are 907.1 on-site parking. Um In the event the mixed-use parcels depicted on the master plan are developed as mixed-use trip reproduction measures projects, Mutterum. Then the on-site parking for the multifamily apartments retail and office within the mixed use

   49:05parcels would like to be shared and calculated at 1.9 spaces per multifamily apartment unit. Also sec s section seven hundred point eight, Platting. The applicant requests the option to be able to submit for Plat and begin the Plat process prior to approval of a no improvement plan, the Plat N I. preliminary development plan and or construction plan as applicable. Regardless of any proposed loom conversions, the commercial retail square footage shall be a minimum of one hundred

   49:35thousand square feet. And residential uses will only be allowed on the parcels of budding US 41 if they're part of a vertically mixed-use integrated building. Here's their master plan.

   49:49And then on January eighth, two thousand eight, the BCC adopted a Comp Plan amendment amending the flu from res three to com. On December 20th, 2011, the BCC adopted a rezoning request from C2 and AC to MPED. And then a Comp Plan amendment to change the land use designation from COM to PD has been concurrently submitted with this MPUD to allow for uses in addition to the commercial and retail, subject to the Loom exchange, to ensure that any such exchange is trip neutral. As

   50:21this project is on the west side of Highway 41, it is outside of the multifamily moratorium. The LDC specifies that variations from this code may be reviewed and approved by the PC and BCC and the applicant is seeking the parking requirement and platting variations as noted previously. The PC heard the item at the July twenty-second meeting and unanimo unanimously voted to recommend approval. And the proposed request is consistent with the LDC and the applicable provisions of the Pasco County Count

   50:51Plan.

   50:54With that, P D recommends approval. With conditions.

   OakleyChair

   50:59Okay. Um

   51:03Do you have some red?

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   51:05Yes, hi. Brad tip in planning and development. I just wanted to uh mention also to point out a piece in here that one of the things that we're doing, the uh development services branch and public infrastructure branch are working together to try and reduce the overall timelines to market for some of these types of projects. Uh so one of the things we've done in here is we've included uh a deviation from our standard plating process. We only are doing that in this particular project and we can only do it based on your approval of this particular set of conditions that would actually allow us to do that.

   51:36We're gonna give it a trial run, see how it works. Uh some other jurisdictions are doing something similar, uh but we're gonna use this as an option to to try and take a first step, see how it works out, and if it's a way to improve our timeline, uh that's what we're hoping for. So that's that's what one of those that planning uh condition is actually about. Right.

   OakleyChair

   51:55Okay. But we have anyone signed up to speak to this item?

   StarkeyVice Chair

   51:59Um

   OakleyChair

   52:00We have an applicant's presentation first. Application's coming, but I mean I was just wondering if anybody's here to speak.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   52:05We do not have anyone signed up to speak on P94 and no one on WebEx.

   OakleyChair

   52:09Okay.

   Barbara Wilhite

   52:09Good afternoon, Commissioner's Barbara Wilhite. Same address as before. Thank you. This is our fifth public hearing on this project. Staff is in support. Unanimous recommendation of Planning Commission. I would echo what Brad Tippen had to say. We worked very hard with Mike Kravala and Brad Tippen's group. to work on this platter plan issue between your two different departments. And I'm really happy that they want to work with us as like they do and collaborate. And

   52:40I think we'll come up with something that'll bring these some of these projects to market quicker. I have a presentation again um but I'm happy to answer questions. I have my team here as well. Okay.

   OakleyChair

   52:49Thank you. Is anyone here to speak to this item that has not signed up? See a no one. Rose of the board.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   53:00Second.

   OakleyChair

   53:01I got a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   53:04Aye.

   OakleyChair

   53:05Motion passed 5-0.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   53:06But I I did want to talk about one thing. Um

   53:11It I mean the the project's approved. I just want to throw something out there to the commissioners. um on the causeway

   53:20The site the road that isn't gonna be used, is it Causeway? What we talked about?

   Barbara Wilhite

   53:26Causeway is ultimately gonna be realigned by a D. R. Horton project. Um we'll do our improvements to Roach's run. This is might be what you're looking for.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   53:36Yeah, so there's a road on the southern part of this project that um I I don't know if that map does it justice there. Um I think that's the best we have.

   Colin Rice

   53:48Yeah, that's still a project.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   53:49Okay. Well, I think we have an opportunity to have a really nice trail come down to connect to the Orange Belt from the southern part of this project, which is gonna be down here. Um South of here, by Wisteria Loop and a little lower. Um th there may be a road that we don't need anymore when they realign causeway. So I just wanna look at that and see if um We can do something something better with that that boulevard. So I'll get with you, Terry, on that one, I guess. Okay. Thank

   54:20you.

   OakleyChair

   54:20Thank you.

   54:23P ninety five.