Zoning Amendment (Regular) – Causeway MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Hagman Groves, Inc. and RS Roach, LC – A Rezoning Request from an MPUD Master Planned Development District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow For Additional Uses on the Property; Add a Land Use Equivalency Matrix (LUEM) and Exchange Process; Change the Name of the Project to Causeway MPUD on 32.66 Acres (Planning Commission (PC): 7/22/21; 1:30 p.m.; NPR)
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jul 22, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jul 22, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-7527 in full →PDD-21-7527 was taken up 2 times between Jul 22, 2021 and Aug 24, 2021 — this is appearance 1.
- Jul 22, 2021PlanningP11▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Aug 24, 2021BoardP94▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 6m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 96% of 28 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Mr. Chairman, following item Denise Hernandez Planning and Development. Following item is P11. It's PDD 217527 Causeway MPUD. Before you is a request to rezone a piece of property from an MPUD to an MPUD to allow for additional uses on the property, to allow a land use equivalency matrix and exchange process. And to change the project from Causeway to Causeway. M PUD on 32.66 acres.
Again, proposed before you is to allow a maximum of 275,000 commercial retail square feet and to introduce a land use equivalency matrix. We call them looms with potential additional uses. Potential additional uses are office, medical office, health care-related uses, light industry distribution, multifamily residential, single-family attached residential.
public institutional uses. Um regardless of any uh land use equivalency matrix conversions, the minimum square footage of commercial retail will be a hundred thousand square feet. Residential uses will only be allowed in the parcels abutting 41 if they are part of a vertically integrated mixed-use building. There's also a couple of requests. One is for variation from the Land Development Code, Section 907.1 on street parking. Should mixed-use parcels depicted on the MPUD be developed as a mixed-use trip
reduction methods, mudram project. Then on-site parking for the multifamily apartments, retail, and office within the mixed-use product parcels request to be shared to share the parking and calculated at 1.9 spaces per multifamily apartment. This is actually, this next one is something I'm reading into record. It's not part of your agenda packet, but I do want to read that item into record, and we will include the revisions to the clerk's office. The applicant
is also requesting a variation from the LDC section 700.8. So that the at the applicant developer's risk, a plat may be submitted and the plat process may be commenced prior to the approval of a no-improvement plat, of a preliminary development plan, andor construction plan. The procedures for that process will be approved by the county administrator or designee without requiring an amendment to the Master Plan Unit Development District. This is the proposed master plan.
Um the uh background on this parcel, on January 8, 2008, the Board Board of County Commissioners adopted a Comp Plan amendment from Res 3, residential three-dwelling units for Gross Acre to Comm for the subject property, which became effective April 10, 2008. On December 20, 2011, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a rezoning from C2 and AC districts to an MPUD master plan unit development district. And a Complant amendment to change the land use designation from COM commercial to plan development has been concurrently submitted with the MPUD
to allow for uses in addition to commercial retail subject to a land use equivalency matrix exchange. This project is on the west side of 41 and it's outside of the multifamily moratorium, which became effective April 1st, 2021, and it's not constrained by the moratorium restrictions. The LDC specifies the variations from the code may be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners at such time as the MPUD zoning amendment. And as stated, the applicant is seeking parking requirements variation and the variation that I read it to
record regarding the plating process. The proposed subject request was found to be consistent with the LDC, Chapter 400, Section 402.2 zoning amendments, MPUD, and with the applicable provisions of the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan. And uh the Planning and Development Department rec recommends that the Planning Commission um uh recommend approval to the to of approval subject to the conditions as stated in your agenda packet and the variation read into record to the BCC.
All right. Thank you, Denise.
Thank you.
Any applicants present?
Barbara Will Hight, 6327 Grand Boulevard, New Port Richey Florida, 34655. Excuse me, three, four, six, five, two for the applicant. Um we are in agreement with staff's recommendation. We have been here before. Um this has gone through the full hearing process, three hearings on the Comp Plan amendment to plan development that was required in order to bring forward the MPUD. The comp plan, the MPD mirrors the comp plan and also adds the requirements regarding
the reserving 100,000 square feet of commercial, making sure the frontage along 41 is only non-residential unless it's verily integrated, and making sure there's a minimum of 5.7 acres provided. Um along. forty one in any event of how the property ultimately develops. The Board of County Commissioners adopted the Comp Plan amendment and we're here for the rezoning. I have my team available. Um if you have any questions.
Okay. Um is there anyone here to object?
I don't see anyone. Any questions from the DAS?
I I just had one very old this formality question, but in the in the conditions of approval references of Landus equivalency matrix is exhibit A. Um I didn't see that in the agenda package.
We're just making sure you're paying attention. Sure,
right.
Um He always is,
uh I I figured it would make it in there before it went to the board, but I just didn't see it. So I'm sure it's the standard equivalent to matrix.
It is, yes.
Pop on.
Yeah.
Noted, thank you.
I'll make a motion to approve. A second.
Okay, we have a motion to approve. We have a second. Uh any further discussion? All in favor of the motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Motion carries.
Okay. I think we're on to twelve.
Yes, sir. Just bringing up the powerboard.