PDD-24-7655

Published agenda

4 appearances between Dec 7, 2023 and Feb 6, 2024, at 2 boards — continued 1 time.

OutcomeApproved by the Board of County Commissioners on Feb 6, 2024

Approved Staff’s recommendation by a roll call vote.

Official title

Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Clinton Avenue MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – CC Waller Rev Trust– A Rezoning Request from an AR Agricultural-Residential District, R-2 Low Density Residential District, and R- 1MH Single Family/Mobile Home District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Maximum Development of 399 Single Family Detached Units and Townhomes.

On a calendar

Dec 7, 2023 → Feb 6, 2024 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance4 of 4 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and ~~removed~~. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 66% of 178 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1Dec 7, 2023
Planning CommissionPC2Consent agendaNo disposition in the minutes
Open this item →
1m
Denise
Thank you, Mr. Chair. Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman Planning Commission Members. Denise Hernandez Planning and Development. We're gonna start start off on item PC two, which is PDD twenty-four seven six five five. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Clinton Avenue MPUD Master Planning Unit Development. This item is a request to continue the item to the January 4th, 2024 Planning Commission meeting at 130 in Dade City.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Okay, is the applicant present?
Is anybody here? To object?
Should we should we continue those one at a time? Or all at once, because they all have different dates.
Denise
What does the clerk want to do? 'Cause sometimes I know it's difficult for you to do
Okay. So can we do this one separately 'cause the next one is gonna unless you want me to skip on to four, five, and six. Why
Unidentified speakerVoice A
don't we just do them one at a time? Just
Unidentified speaker
do them
Denise
one at a time so
Unidentified speaker
that's
Denise
fine.
Unidentified speaker
All right.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
So motion or need a motion. So make a mo Sorry. All right, there's a motion to continue to the January 4th meeting. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
2Jan 4, 2024
Planning CommissionPC7Consent agendaNo disposition in the minutes
Zoning Amendment ~~(Continuance)~~ (Consent) – Clinton Avenue MPUD … Detached Units and Townhomes.
Open this item →
10m
Denise
Right, so we're gonna move on to item PC seven. That's PDD 247655. Clinton Avenue MPUD Master Planning Unit Development, CC Waller, Revocable Trust. It's for a rezoning from an AR agricultural residential, R2 Low Density Residential, and an R1MH single family mobile home district, to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District in order to allow for maximum development of three.
These will all be platted. I know that in your packet it says that there will be multifamily apartment units, and that's because they did a traffic study based on that, but that is not what they're proposing at all, nor are they proposing to loom any of that information. And it comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Charles GreyChair
Alright. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? See another one? Okay, next.
Denise
Following item is PC eight, PDD twenty four, seven seven six one, JI Pirana LLC. It's for a change in zoning from a C2 general commercial district to an I-1 Light Industrial Park District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that limits the uses to the I-1 Light Industrial Park District uses. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Charles GreyChair
Okay. The applicant present? No one here to object?
See no one?
Denise
Following item is PC nine, PDD 24, 7751. It's a zoning amendment in the names of Thomas J. Ambrose II and Jennifer Ray McNeil. It's for a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential, R1, Rural Density Residential, and R2 Low Density Residential District, to an MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District with deed restrictions as included in your findings. That specific has architectural features. the limit limiting
the number of units to 42 townhomes on the property, they're going to be platted, so on and so forth as included in your finding of fact number two comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Charles GreyChair
All right. Is the applicant present?
Anyone here object? Okay.
Next.
Denise
Following item is PC 10, PDD 247757. This is a special exception. The names of Brian Post, Carrie Matthew, Townsend Road Industrial. It's for a freestanding recreational vehicle and boat storage in an I-1 Light Industrial Park District, just so happens to be enclosed. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Charles GreyChair
All right, is the applicant present? You wanted to object. Okay.
Denise
Following item is PC 11, PDD 240065. This is a comprehensive plan amendment. You're sitting as a local planning agency on this matter. CPA 2310, Grace and Truth E-Land. It's for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map 2-15 and sheet 5 from Res 1 and AGR to CON Conservation Lands. approximately 318 acres of property located n north of 52 and between the Sun Coast
Parkway. and US 41. This is as a result of an environmental lands acquisition and management program acquisition of property. So it comes to you with that you find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Charles GreyChair
All right. Is there anybody here to Comment on this.
Okay.
Denise
And that is the end of your consent agenda.
We have somebody that's commenting on the pull that one.
We will pull PC eleven.
I think they have to vote on the consent agenda first and then move it car.
Charles GreyChair
Okay. We have a motion to approve the consent agenda as a modified So moved I
Jon Moody
know in PC seven we had a letter that came in to uh that it was in that position. I don't know if that's P C seven.
Unidentified speakerVoice B
Mm-hmm.
Charles GreyChair
Yeah,
Jon Moody
yeah.
Denise
You had an oppos you had opposition on PC seven?
Chris Williams
No, I thought I thought the letter was on twelve.
Unidentified speaker
I think there was one on seven too. Yes there was an email that that came in.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Yeah it was uh it was an email I think that came in either last night or the night before. Oh, Tuesday night. So it looks like it was just to the Planning Board members. Okay.
Jon Moody
I th I think we should hear it just so we can address the objections in the Did
Christopher Poole
you need a copy of it, Denise,
Jon Moody
of the email?
Denise
Um I would love to see that, yeah, absolutely. So that we can provide it to the clerk's office as an ex ex party communication.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
When did it come? It came in actually came in Tuesday at nine o'clock and I I mean the person's not even here, so I don't even know What's the I don't know what the p protocol is, but
Jon Moody
I wondered too.
Charles GreyChair
Well
Denise
if one of you would forward the email to me that would be fabulous. Thank you.
Yeah.
I I think the Planning Commission is gonna make that determination.
Charles GreyChair
Yeah, is it is it some kind of lengthy letter or what?
Denise
Yeah,
Jon Moody
it's like What was that comment?
Unidentified speakerVoice A
I mean that's really what it comes down to. I mean they they asked about public noticing, they asked about you know the things you just mentioned about apartments versus the right-of-way.
Denise
that letter he may have responded to that person.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Yeah, unfortunately it doesn't look like any county staff was copied on it, so
Charles GreyChair
Okay, Mr. Uh Vermillion.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
You want to comment? One quick question, Mr. Chairman, just for a point of clarification. He may be able to answer all these and it may be a move point anyway, but if there's no one here actually objecting to it, then I don't think feel it should come off a consent agenda even if someone sent an email. I haven't taken it off consent. Okay. Okay. I just I don't even know what's in the email. I haven't seen it.
Jon Moody
Yeah, I just wanna make sure we address the letter was sent, that's all.
Unidentified speakerVoice B
Okay.
Chris Williams
Yeah, here's the Mr. Chairman Mariano here. I think that at least one member of the board did have an opportunity to read this. I think the attorney should be given the copy so that he understands what's in your referral. We have an opportunity to look at it. So if I could as a point of order recommend that he have this copy, as it is the only copy That's available to us. But
to to at least uh address the concerns in it. I was just saying two. Two. Yeah.
Pasco County
Well regardless you need to make a motion on what you're doing with your consent agenda. Right. So either it's either you decide if P S P seven is on there or not. And you just need to make a a
decision.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Uh what I would prefer to do if you all are okay with since the person's not here and I don't even have Have a an opportunity to cross examine the person, as I'm entitled to do, is to leave it on consent. Someone provide me the email and I will work with staff to respond to the person's questions. I think that's the only proper thing to do.
Jaimie GirardiVice Chair
Do appear all to be posed as questions, not necessarily objections. Right.
Charles GreyChair
Yeah. In that in that case, I agree with what you just suggested. And I think that's a good suggestion. I I'd like to uh I mean my preference would be to leave it on consent. Since they're really just posing questions. And you can respond to them.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
We're we're happy to do so. Okay. Thank you.
Charles GreyChair
So if that's the pleasure of the board, whatever the pleasure of the board I'd like to hear a motion.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Is there a motion? There's not a motion on the floor.
Charles GreyChair
There's a motion on the floor. I made a motion to approve yep. And we have a second.
Pasco County
So the consent agenda just so we're clear is P seven, P eight, P nine, and P ten. Yes. Right. Correct. Okay.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Oh second.
Charles GreyChair
Yeah we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Okay, motion carries. And we're all Putting P C eleven on the regular items.
Okay.
3Jan 9, 2024
Board of County CommissionersP59Public hearingContinued
Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – … – CC Waller Rev ~~Trust–~~ Trust – A Rezoning Request from … Family Detached Units and ~~Townhomes.~~ Townhomes
Approved minutes
Approved to continue the item to the February 6, 2024 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City with Commissioner Bradford absent from the vote.
Open this item →
1m
Kathryn Starkey
P-59 was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times November 22, 2023. Item P 59 is PDD
Denise
247655 its zoning amendment. Clinton Avenue MPUD Master Plan Unit CC Waller Revocable Trust. The request is to continue the item to the February 6, 2024 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 in Date City.
Jack Mariano
Move
Ron OakleyChair
to continue time certain. Yeah motion and second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed like sign. Motion passed 4-0. Move on to P sixty.
4Feb 6, 2024
Board of County CommissionersP43Public hearingApproved
Zoning Amendment ~~(Continuance)~~ (Consent) – Clinton Avenue MPUD … Family Detached Units and ~~Townhomes.~~ Townhomes
Approved minutes
Approved Staff’s recommendation by a roll call vote.
Open this item →
under a minute1/2
Unidentified speakerVoice D
P forty three was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times November 22nd, 2023, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Denise
Mr. Chair, can we please move to P forty
Unidentified speakerVoice D
six?
12m2/2
Ron OakleyChair
Aye. Motion passed 5-0. Do we go back to
Unidentified speakerVoice E
Did pick
Ron OakleyChair
up
Unidentified speakerVoice E
the rest of the the consent agenda forty three to forty three.
Denise
Okay, I think the advertisement was read on that one. It was. Thank you. It's uh P483 is PDD 247655. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Clinton Avenue, MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, CC Waller, Revocable Trust. It's a rezoning from an AR Agricultural Residential, R2 Low Density Residential, and R1MH Single Family Mobile Home District, to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District. To allow for the maximum development of 399 single-family, detached units and townhomes. It
comes here with a recommendation of approval with conditions. I do want to mention that there were ex parte communications between the applicant's representative and all the commissioners. Those have been provided to the clerk's office, and to the extent that they may not have been, we will be providing those.
Ron OakleyChair
Okay, does everyone sign up for this item?
Unidentified speakerVoice D
No, sir.
Ron OakleyChair
No one signed up for the item. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item?
Kathryn Starkey
Um I well I have a message.
Ron OakleyChair
Or excuse me, speak against this item.
Kathryn Starkey
Well I don't all I have is this one page.
Ron OakleyChair
It's a consent. Yeah.
For forty three or short.
Kathryn Starkey
Oh wait a minute, wait a minute. I'm sorry, that's the wrong way. Wait. Sorry, that's forty two.
Um
Can we So this is
Ron OakleyChair
If you're not if you don't speak to it, we'll pull it off consent, its own consent.
Kathryn Starkey
Mm-hmm.
This is Clark here. I know I'm Clark. I see so many of these. I just don't remember it. Can I just get a little presentation actually?
Unidentified speakerVoice E
I would suggest you pull it off consent. Let me pull it off consent and we'll move on to the next one. So I'm gonna pull it off over
Ron OakleyChair
here. We'll move on to uh P forty four.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
P forty four was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times November twenty second, twenty twenty three, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Denise
P forty four is PD twenty four seven seven five one. It's a zoning amendment under the name of Thomas J. Ambrose II and Jennifer Ray McNeil. It's to for a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential, R1 Rural Density Residential, and R2, Low Density Residential District. To an MF1 multiple family medium density district to allow the development of a total of 42 townhomes with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction, which basically incorporates the requirements of PM 26 memo, which includes
monotony controls, architectural standards, tree planting, etc. This comes here with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commissioner Weightman. who heard the item on January 4th, 2024.
Ron OakleyChair
Okay, is anyone here to speak against this item?
Seeing no one, let it stay on consent. Move on to P45.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
P forty-five was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times, December 20th, 2023, and by appetitive certified mailings and site postings.
Denise
Item P forty five is PDD twenty-four seven seven six one. It's a zoning amendment in the name of J.I. Pirana LLC for a change in zoning from a C2 General Commercial District to an I1 Light Industrial Park District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that uh reserves the uses to those uses in the I-1 district, which is also known as the Live Local Deed Restriction, comes through with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission who heard the item on January 4, 2024.
Ron OakleyChair
Okay, is there anyone here to speak against this item?
Unidentified speakerVoice D
There's no one signed up?
Ron OakleyChair
No one signed up? No one here to speak against it. It remains on consent item. And we move on to P47.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
P-47 was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times December 20, 2023, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Denise
On item piece 47, which is PDD 240065, today we're asking that you approve the transmittal to Florida Commerce and other reviewing agencies. This is a comprehensive plan amendment, CPA 2310, Grace and Truth E-Lamp, providing for transmittal for the proposed comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map-15 and sheet 5 from Res One, Residential One Dwelling in Gross Acre. and AGR agricultural rules to con conservation lands on approximately 318
acres of real property located north of State Road 52 and between the Cent Coast Parkway and U.S. Highway 41. Again, please approve Transmittal to the Department of Commerce and other reviewing agencies.
Ron OakleyChair
Okay, is there anyone here to speak against P47?
Unidentified speakerVoice D
There's no one signed up.
Ron OakleyChair
No one signed up? No one on the web acts?
Unidentified speakerVoice D
Correct.
Ron OakleyChair
Okay. Um No one to speak against it. I entertain a motion for the consent agenda. Move approval.
Kathryn Starkey
Exactly. That's a great project.
Ron OakleyChair
I got a motion and a second by roll call vote.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
District two commissioner Weightman. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Aye, I'm sorry.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
That's okay. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District one, Chairman Oakley.
Ron OakleyChair
Aye. Motion pass five zero the consent items we'll go back to uh p P forty-three, uh Ms. Starkey.
Kathryn Starkey
Well I I just had some I just want to see that layout again and I I realized I had sent something to Clark but it went to his office phone instead of his cell phone so now I know why you didn't answer me my questions on this so I apologize. I don't know how that I don't know how that's happening. Um Mm-hmm.
Ron OakleyChair
All right, Mr Hobby.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Uh Mr. Chairman, uh Clark Hobby, Hobby and Hobby PA 109 North Brush Street, Tampa, Florida, have been sworn. Staff is pulling up our concept plan that I showed to the commissioners and ex parte meetings, but did not leave with them. I'll give you a little bit of a rundown on the project because it's been a couple of months just to refresh everyone's memory. So this site is on the Waller family's property, obviously. We lost Mr. Waller recently, and um it's uh actually
directly across from where Mr. Commissioner Oakley lived for many years. Beautiful piece of property on the north side of Clinton Avenue where the four laning has now occurred. The whole area is res 6 or res 9. Most of the property directly north of the project, running all the way to 15. been annexed into Dade City. And when we filed the project 18, 24 months ago, it included a substantial multifamily component. We completely
retooled it with a lot of work from Florida Design Consultants and Brian Panico at DR Horton and the plan you see here today eliminated all of the multifamily, it's only townhouses and single-family detached. And the density is approximately 15% less than the future land use would have allowed. Other amenities that we've talked about that you know the plan shows you is a couple things. We're leaving extra property on the
Clinton extension. It's an additional right-of-way for the county to bring its trail there. And as you can see, I think it's shown on the plan and it's on the MPUD master plan. We have a 12 uh foot wide path of our own that's coming down there multi-use path. Yeah. that will join in with the counties uh extension that obviously is more regional in nature. And then there's a combination of on-site trails running around the big lake that you see there
and the central feature and a lot of on street parking and we have significantly more parks than the code requires on our plan. So I'm really proud of the plan. I think it's a great plan. Um and happy to answer any questions you may have about it.
Kathryn Starkey
So Clark, you have um
These blocks are eight town ho eight townhomes in a row.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Um Um
max their eight.
Kathryn Starkey
And they're all front loaded?
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Yes.
Kathryn Starkey
Is all the product in here front loaded?
Unidentified speakerVoice C
I believe so. That's that correct. That's correct. We're front loaded. We do just for the commission's benefit, we didn't have to comply with the newer memo with regard to the new architectural and and green space and stuff because the project's been in so long, but we voluntarily agreed to comply with that. So we're meeting all those requirements, Commissioner, that you wanted last last year.
Ron OakleyChair
Lot sizes?
Unidentified speakerVoice C
We meet everything. We well the only thing no townhouse. That's right. Yeah.
Unidentified speakerVoice E
It looks like they've got the are the dark orange is forty by a hundred and ten and
Unidentified speakerVoice C
the
Unidentified speakerVoice E
yellow is fifty by a hundred and ten.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Right. So we meet that's right. Forties and fifties in towns. That's right. But we did again, we met all of the new memo even though we didn't have to for everything but the side yard setbacks. So we met everything else voluntarily. Okay, check. Again, I think it's a great project. It's we uh Commissioner, we discussed before, beautiful view sheds with the parks we created from the entryway. A lot of thought has gone into that with D. R. Horton and Brian Panico and Rob
Rosner at F D C to create a very special place and have a So
Kathryn Starkey
the backyards of the town homes are gonna be fronting Clinton Avenue?
Unidentified speakerVoice C
There's a big buffer in between and there'll be a wall.
Ron OakleyChair
See that that's a stormwater ditch
Kathryn Starkey
road, the backyards of those houses are gonna be facing Roberts Road.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Mm-hmm. Yeah. This would be the back yeah, on the on the north side, yes. That's right. That's a that's a dirt road, just so you know. Yeah. They were all dirt, dirt red.
Kathryn Starkey
I gotta figure out a way to
Unidentified speakerVoice C
This is a great project, Commissioner. I mean we've made a
Kathryn Starkey
I am not a fan of front loaded town homes.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
I know.
Kathryn Starkey
I think they are
Unidentified speakerVoice C
that's that's why
Kathryn Starkey
not good for the future of our community.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
But that's why we came up with a memo last year to improve on stuff. Yeah. That's why we're following it. Okay. Thank you.
Kathryn Starkey
Thanks, Clark. Yep.
Ron OakleyChair
Thank you.
Anyone else uh to speak to this project?
See no one. Pleasure board.
What X? There's no running WebEx, no. No answer. Move approval? No. I got a motion.
Kathryn Starkey
There's two other commissioners that can second.
Ron OakleyChair
Okay. Mr. Weightman second. All those in favor by all those in favor by uh roll call vote.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.
Commissioner Bradford?
Unidentified speaker
Hi.
Unidentified speakerVoice D
District five, Commissioner Mariano. District one, Chairman Oakley.
Ron OakleyChair
Aye. Motion pass five zero. Move on to P forty eight.