Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Clinton Avenue MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – CC Waller Rev Trust– A Rezoning Request from an AR Agricultural-Residential District, R-2 Low Density Residential District, and R- 1MH Single Family/Mobile Home District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Maximum Development of 399 Single Family Detached Units and Townhomes.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jan 4, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jan 4, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-24-7655 in full →PDD-24-7655 was taken up 4 times between Dec 7, 2023 and Feb 6, 2024, continued 1 time — this is appearance 2.
- Dec 7, 2023PlanningPC2▶No disposition in the minutes
- Jan 4, 2024PlanningPC7▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Jan 9, 2024BoardP59▶Continued
- Feb 6, 2024BoardP43▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 10m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 82% of 65 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Right, so we're gonna move on to item PC seven. That's PDD 247655. Clinton Avenue MPUD Master Planning Unit Development, CC Waller, Revocable Trust. It's for a rezoning from an AR agricultural residential, R2 Low Density Residential, and an R1MH single family mobile home district, to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District in order to allow for maximum development of three.
These will all be platted. I know that in your packet it says that there will be multifamily apartment units, and that's because they did a traffic study based on that, but that is not what they're proposing at all, nor are they proposing to loom any of that information. And it comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Alright. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? See another one? Okay, next.
Following item is PC eight, PDD twenty four, seven seven six one, JI Pirana LLC. It's for a change in zoning from a C2 general commercial district to an I-1 Light Industrial Park District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that limits the uses to the I-1 Light Industrial Park District uses. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay. The applicant present? No one here to object?
See no one?
Following item is PC nine, PDD 24, 7751. It's a zoning amendment in the names of Thomas J. Ambrose II and Jennifer Ray McNeil. It's for a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential, R1, Rural Density Residential, and R2 Low Density Residential District, to an MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District with deed restrictions as included in your findings. That specific has architectural features. the limit limiting
the number of units to 42 townhomes on the property, they're going to be platted, so on and so forth as included in your finding of fact number two comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
All right. Is the applicant present?
Anyone here object? Okay.
Next.
Following item is PC 10, PDD 247757. This is a special exception. The names of Brian Post, Carrie Matthew, Townsend Road Industrial. It's for a freestanding recreational vehicle and boat storage in an I-1 Light Industrial Park District, just so happens to be enclosed. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
All right, is the applicant present? You wanted to object. Okay.
Following item is PC 11, PDD 240065. This is a comprehensive plan amendment. You're sitting as a local planning agency on this matter. CPA 2310, Grace and Truth E-Land. It's for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map 2-15 and sheet 5 from Res 1 and AGR to CON Conservation Lands. approximately 318 acres of property located n north of 52 and between the Sun Coast
Parkway. and US 41. This is as a result of an environmental lands acquisition and management program acquisition of property. So it comes to you with that you find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
All right. Is there anybody here to Comment on this.
Okay.
And that is the end of your consent agenda.
We have somebody that's commenting on the pull that one.
We will pull PC eleven.
I think they have to vote on the consent agenda first and then move it car.
Okay. We have a motion to approve the consent agenda as a modified So moved I
know in PC seven we had a letter that came in to uh that it was in that position. I don't know if that's P C seven.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah,
yeah.
You had an oppos you had opposition on PC seven?
No, I thought I thought the letter was on twelve.
I think there was one on seven too. Yes there was an email that that came in.
Yeah it was uh it was an email I think that came in either last night or the night before. Oh, Tuesday night. So it looks like it was just to the Planning Board members. Okay.
I th I think we should hear it just so we can address the objections in the Did
you need a copy of it, Denise,
of the email?
Um I would love to see that, yeah, absolutely. So that we can provide it to the clerk's office as an ex ex party communication.
When did it come? It came in actually came in Tuesday at nine o'clock and I I mean the person's not even here, so I don't even know What's the I don't know what the p protocol is, but
I wondered too.
Well
if one of you would forward the email to me that would be fabulous. Thank you.
Yeah.
I I think the Planning Commission is gonna make that determination.
Yeah, is it is it some kind of lengthy letter or what?
Yeah,
it's like What was that comment?
I mean that's really what it comes down to. I mean they they asked about public noticing, they asked about you know the things you just mentioned about apartments versus the right-of-way.
that letter he may have responded to that person.
Yeah, unfortunately it doesn't look like any county staff was copied on it, so
Okay, Mr. Uh Vermillion.
You want to comment? One quick question, Mr. Chairman, just for a point of clarification. He may be able to answer all these and it may be a move point anyway, but if there's no one here actually objecting to it, then I don't think feel it should come off a consent agenda even if someone sent an email. I haven't taken it off consent. Okay. Okay. I just I don't even know what's in the email. I haven't seen it.
Yeah, I just wanna make sure we address the letter was sent, that's all.
Okay.
Yeah, here's the Mr. Chairman Mariano here. I think that at least one member of the board did have an opportunity to read this. I think the attorney should be given the copy so that he understands what's in your referral. We have an opportunity to look at it. So if I could as a point of order recommend that he have this copy, as it is the only copy That's available to us. But
to to at least uh address the concerns in it. I was just saying two. Two. Yeah.
Well regardless you need to make a motion on what you're doing with your consent agenda. Right. So either it's either you decide if P S P seven is on there or not. And you just need to make a a
decision.
Uh what I would prefer to do if you all are okay with since the person's not here and I don't even have Have a an opportunity to cross examine the person, as I'm entitled to do, is to leave it on consent. Someone provide me the email and I will work with staff to respond to the person's questions. I think that's the only proper thing to do.
Do appear all to be posed as questions, not necessarily objections. Right.
Yeah. In that in that case, I agree with what you just suggested. And I think that's a good suggestion. I I'd like to uh I mean my preference would be to leave it on consent. Since they're really just posing questions. And you can respond to them.
We're we're happy to do so. Okay. Thank you.
So if that's the pleasure of the board, whatever the pleasure of the board I'd like to hear a motion.
Is there a motion? There's not a motion on the floor.
There's a motion on the floor. I made a motion to approve yep. And we have a second.
So the consent agenda just so we're clear is P seven, P eight, P nine, and P ten. Yes. Right. Correct. Okay.
Oh second.
Yeah we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Okay, motion carries. And we're all Putting P C eleven on the regular items.
Okay.