Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Erik Domenech – Change in Zoning from an A- R Agricultural-Residential District and R-1MH Single-Family/Mobile Home District to a R-MH Mobile Home District – Southeast Pasco County – Southwest Corner of the Intersection of Tucker Road and Michelle Road – Containing Approximately 15.22 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 5, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, May 5, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-7617 in full →PDD-22-7617 was taken up 2 times between May 5, 2022 and Jun 7, 2022 — this is appearance 1.
- May 5, 2022PlanningPC6▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Jun 7, 2022BoardP89▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 9m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 65 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
This is item PC six, PDD 22-7616, in the name of Eric Dominic. It is a zoning amendment from AR Agricultural Residential District and R R1 MH, Single Family Mobile Home District, to a RMH Mobile Home District.
The subject site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Tucker Road and Michelle Lane. This is a look at the aerial view.
The surrounding future land used to the north, south, east and west is Res9. The surrounding zoning to the north and east is AR. Rm H, R one M H and to the south and west is A R. The subject site is currently undeveloped on approximately 15.22 acres. The applicant is proposing to develop the property with a mobile home subdivision in conformance with the RMH zoning district standards. Access to the property is from Tucker Lane, a county
maintained local road with approximately forty feet of right of way, and a Butts Michelle Lane, a privately maintained local road with approximately thirty feet of right of way. The surrounding area is characterized by residential development, mobile home subdivisions, and travel trailers slash recreational vehicle parks, and the future land use is Res 9 for the subject site, and this is coming with a recommendation for approval from PDD staff. I'm here if you have any questions. All right. Any questions?
Is the primary access to the from Tucker Tucker Road land?
That is correct.
Okay. Because it's not clear on the conceptual plane.
Oh, there was a correction. I do apologize. You were all sent yesterday a revised agenda memo and that was also sent to the clerk's office. That correction was for finding a fact number 15.
Would you like me to
do that?
Would you like me to read the whole finding it back into record? Um should we? I don't know if it's necessary but
I don't think you need to. You've already passed it out. Yep. They're aware of it.
Any other questions?
Any other questions really?
I have a question. Um
Number two talks about um
The shell lane adjacent to the site will not be connected to. I assume that just means it's not going to be connected to this developer. Is that what that means?
I'm sorry, are you talking about the narrative from the applicant from uh so I would let the applicant and their team to to answer that question because that narrative is coming from the applicant.
Okay.
Okay, so is the applicant present?
Shelly, are you sure this is yours?
Sorry about that. Shelley Johnson, [address removed], and I have been sworn. Um I'll reserve time. I'm happy to answer any questions. My understanding is that the axis is on Tucker Road. And that there's gonna be improvements made to tuck a road out to Autumn. Palm Drive, I believe is the name of the other road, access road, so
But but there is no access from Michelle? Is that correct?
I don't believe there's an access proposed at this time. I don't think there's enough units. It hasn't gone through site plan review that I'm aware of or anything, you know, hasn't been engineered yet, but my understanding is it's gonna be on Tucker Road. So But we're here to answer any questions.
Okay. Uh is there anyone here to object? Uh yeah, I think I see somebody way in the back there. That's you.
Yeah, just kind of ask some questions, I guess. Uh my name is Sophia Drew, uh [address removed]. I'm here with my mother on behalf of her. So the only real issue that we have is drainage. Um, over the past 20-something years that we've been on the property, drainage water from Tucker drains directly into Michelle Lane and floods the road. That road is not up to standard by any. me means we can earnly get down at ourselves. So we were wondering if they were gonna be intending to use that road and if that
was the case, what was their plan for drainage for um for the extra water that's gonna be coming in. um for Michelle Lane and if they were gonna put up a fence to border off the area.
Okay. Any other questions about it?
My mama wanted to know if it was gonna be a multifamily type place where you could go like there if there was gonna be any age restrictions on the park.
Okay. In other words it was a senior park.
Correct.
Okay. All right. We'll see if we can get those answered for you. And you did a great job.
Thank you.
Anybody else?
Miss Shelley? Mm-hmm.
Yes, Tucker Road, like I said, um i they've d they've agreed it's substandard so that's gonna be improved out to autumn palm lane, so that'll be and then the drainage and all that'll be dealt with, you know, when they actually design the road and do the improvement to it. So But that's all stuff that they address at the site plan. As far as landscape buffering, my understanding is it's gonna be in accordance with the code, which I'm assuming is a type A because it's you know, residential against residential, so which is a ten foot buffer.
Okay. Did anybody have a question? There was also a question about whether it was gonna be aid restricted for retirement.
Oh I'm sorry, you're right. No, it is not. There's no plan right now to have an age restriction on it. It's just gonna be a a mobile home subdivision.
Okay. Will they own the lots or are they gonna rent the lots?
He's gonna own them, he said.
Okay.
So
very good. Thank you.
All right. Any other questions from up here?
I guess.
Sophia Drew 3752 Michelle. Thank you so much for answering the questions. The only other thing my we wanted to point out was that if they were going to be homes that, and it says here approximately 90 homes, that's gonna include maybe possibly 90 families, and we just wanted to make sure the county was keeping in mind that you know we are, which you all know, uh blowing up, and our schools there's a only one s high school in Sephiroths, there's only like two elementary schools, so it it would be a concern that our schools are even going
to be more overf overfilled as a result even a small neighborhood like this one. So
So we have Mr Williams here representing the schools, so he's speak to that for you.
Sure. So um currently Zephyrhills High does have capacity. We added a bunch of capacity when we remodeled that school. Um, certainly our elementary schools in that area are are either a little bit under capacity or at capacity, but certainly with the Not only this project but other projects. We're continually to monitor that and build additional schools as we need to. We do own land. Uh north
east of
Zephyrhills.
Yes.
For a feature school.
Yeah, I've seen it. I've seen the sides, but we never we didn't know if it was ever gonna be developed.
So
Okay.
That's where we are, but thank you.
Thank you so much. Thank you.
Thank you. Mr. Chairman, my my only other question for the applicant is is Chris's question about uh Michelle Lane. Uh b it's it's not clear it's adjacent to the site will not be connected to. So I'm assuming there's no that by by that there's they mean there's no access to to or from Michelle Lane to the development, just to confirm that with the advocate.
So Wait, can you get up and speak for the record please?
Yes, Shelley Johnson again, [address removed]. I have been sworn there's no access to Michelle Lane, it's only on Tucker, as I indicated. Yep.
Thank you.
All right. Does that answer everybody's questions? If so, we'll hear a motion.
Motion to approve? So I can
Have a motion and a second any further discussion of the motion. Mm-hmm. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like signed. All right. Motion carries.