Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Continuance) - CPAL22(02) PC Addendum Agenda 4G Ranch PD- Providing for A Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 22) Changing From AG/R (Agricultural/Rural) To PD (Planned Development) On Approximately 2,903 Acres Of Real Property Located North of State Road 52 Approximately 2.25 Miles East Of Land O Lakes Blvd; And A Text Amendment Creating Subarea Policy Flu 7.1.70 – 4G Ranch PD; And A Map Amendment To The Future Land Use Map 2-9 Adding Subarea Map 2-9(70) 4G Ranch PD; And An Amendment To The Conservation Element Map 3-4: Critical Linkages Map; Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Mar 2, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Mar 2, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-23-0132 in full →PDD-23-0132 was taken up 4 times between Mar 2, 2023 and Jul 11, 2023 — this is appearance 1.
- Mar 2, 2023PlanningPC6▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Mar 16, 2023PlanningPC6No disposition in the minutes
- Apr 4, 2023BoardP51▶Approved
- Jul 11, 2023BoardP50▶Adopted
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 80% of 5 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Following item is PC six, that's PDB 230132. This is a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment, C call 2202, 4G Ranch PD. And this is a um first off, I'd like to state on the record that there is an ex parte communication with John Moody that has been uh submitted to the clerk's office. Um this is a request to continue the item to the 316-23. And commit LPA meeting at 130 in Newport Ritchie.
All right, is the applicant present? There's the apple going to project. Is anyone else here to object?
All right. I hear a motion.
Some of Second.
The motion is second. Any further discussion? Not all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Uh like signed for nay.