Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) - CPAL22(02) 4G Ranch PD- Providing For Transmittal Of A Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 5, 6, 12, 13) Changing From AG/R (Agricultural/Rural) To PD (Planned Development) And CON (Conservation Lands) On Approximately 2,903 Acres Of Real Property Located North of State Road 52 Approximately 2.25 Miles East Of Land O Lakes Blvd; And A Text Amendment Creating Subarea Policy FLU 7.1.70 – 4G Ranch PD; And A Map Amendment To The Future Land Use Map 2-9 Adding Subarea Map 2-9(70) 4G Ranch PD; And An Amendment To The Conservation Element Map 3-4: Critical Linkages Map

18:02Second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. P 51.

18:10P 51, proof of publication, Tampa Bay Times, March 1, 2023, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

18:18P51 is PDD 230132. It's a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment, C PAL 2202, 4D Ranch PD, providing for transmittal of a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map 2-15 and Sheet 5, 612-13, changing from AGR agricultural rural to PD Plant Development and CON Conservation Lands on approximately 2,903 acres of real property located north of state room 52. 2.25 miles east of Land O' Lakes Boulevard and a text amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.704G

18:50Ranch PD and a map amendment to a future land use map 2-9, adding sub-area map 2-970 4G ranch PD and an amendment to the conservation element map 3-4 critical linkages map. Today we're asking that you authorize transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing. agencies. This comes here with a recommendation of the LPA, found it consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommended approval to the BCC on 316 and 23.

19:16Okay, this is listed on consent. Uh however, there's a few people that have signed up for it.

19:22Mm-hmm. So

19:23I'm gonna say we need to pull that off consent and we'll have to wait um and and for the for the record just over knows We had a saddlebrook hearing two months ago and it's been been continued to today. So before we do all these other items that don't get approved under consent, we're gonna go to the saddlebrook hearing first so we can get that done and we'll step in line for everything else after that. All right, so we're gonna pull P fifty one off consent.

19:51P fifty two.

19:52Tampa Bay Times, February first, twenty twenty three.

19:55PDD 230237, this is Development Agreement, Boga Ranch, Villages of Pasadena Development Agreement, Boga Ranch LLC is for development agreement for the Boga Ranch Master Plan Unit Development District to design, permit, and construct roadway improvements in exchange for transportation development fees. We're asking that you approve the development agreement. This was presented to the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee on February 15th of this year. went to the local planning agency on March 2nd of this year.

20:25One person to speak? Mm-hmm. Um I should have asked this other one, but is there is the person to speak on P fifty two in opposition? What's the name?

20:33Hobby Clark.

20:34No, he's not. Clark

20:35Harbor

20:35Hobby.

20:38Clark? Okay.

20:41Two seconds.

20:44I just want to make sure that it's not my team that's on four G Ranch, but that there actually is someone in a an objection to it.

20:53Okay. So on P fifty one, is everyone anyone signed up in opposition to the item? I didn't see anybody. Okay, no. So let's go leave that on consent.

21:05So no no one's in a opposition. Okay. Yeah. Uh P fifty three.

21:11P-53, Tampa Bay Times, February 15th, 2023.

21:15PD D twenty three seven six two two is a zoning amendment. JSN Clinton MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, JSN Clinton LLC, so rezoning request from AR Agricultural Residential, AR One Agricultural Residential, C2 General Commercial, and MPUD, MPUD Master Plan Unit Development Zoning Districts to an MPUD to allow for a maximum of 190 single family attached slash townhome dwellings and associated infrastructure on a property. Approximately twenty-seven point three six acres comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planning Commission and the Planning and Development Department.

21:47Mr. Chairman Mariano on this. Um who's the who's the attorney of record on this one? Barbara Wall. Yeah, I think we talked about this about the Um the multi use trail on the north side of Clinton Avenue and the right of way that's needed. It's just if you're okay with that then okay.

22:08We have a support. I will leave it on consent. Um I wanted to pull f pull P fifty four and fifty five. There'll be quick discussions, but I do want to have a discussion. Commissioner Weightman?

22:22I was gonna say I'm right with you on P fifty four and P fifty five and

22:25we

22:25could we could knock those out pretty quick.

22:27Okay.

22:28You want

22:28publication

22:29next um or we okay do public.

22:34We're just gonna pull them to talk to them.

22:37P fifty four, Tampa Bay Times, February one, twenty twenty-three, P fifty five, Tampa Bay Times, March one, twenty twenty-three.

22:45Okay. Thank you. Uh P fifty six, Conerton.

22:49Tampa Bay Times,

22:50February first, twenty twenty-three.

22:52Okay.

22:52Speedy D twenty three seven six four three, Conerton Village one MPUDs for a zoning amendment. Substantial modification. Uh Conerton Conerton Village One M PUD master plan. Unit Development Districts, substantial modification, DR Red E-commerce LLC. It's substantial modifications to the village one MPUD to allow an addition of 56 multifamily units and 10,000 square feet of retail office. Comes through with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

23:20Okay.

23:22Any comments for staff on this? this? It's not consent. Anyone in opposition to this item? Leave it on concern? P fifty seven.

23:35Did I hear that

23:36that one

23:36wanted to be you wanted to pull that one,

23:38Commissioner

23:38Weightman? Okay, just checking.

23:40No no opposition there. Okay. P fifty seven.

23:42P fifty seven, Tampa Bay Times for everyone, twenty twenty-three. That's P D D twenty three seven six five six, zoning amendment, Evans Nursery Villages of Pasadena Hills, Master Plan Unit Development, Galvin Harris Land Services, substantial modification to the Evans parcel F1 MPUD to remain to rename it to Evans Nursery MPUD and to decrease the geographical land area of the non-residential village center. of a portion of village F. It comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions for the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee and the Planning and the Planning and Development Department.

24:12Okay. Is anyone here and speak to speak in opposition to P fifty seven? Okay, leave that on the consent.

24:22It goes along with those other two.

24:24Okay. And and add that to the same quick discussion with fifty four and fifty-five, please.

24:32So those items pulled, I have a motion on the rest of the consent agenda. So

24:36move. Mr. Chairman just for clarity, that's P fifty two, P fifty three, and P fifty six. So it's remaining back on that? Um fifty fifty

24:45three. Yeah, fifty one, fifty two, fifty three. Yeah, that's the forg.

24:51I thought P fifty one was pulled.

24:59Okay.

25:0052. Okay. I thought you said you had speakers signed up.

25:03We've we addressed that. You missed that. Clark because Clark Clark mentioned he thought it must it might have been his change. I'm gonna clarify the motion.

25:11Okay.

25:11The motion on the table right now is to approve the consent agenda which includes P fifty one. P P fifty two, P fifty three, P fifty six, P fifty eight no I'm sorry, not P fifty eight.

25:27Commissioner Yeah, someone on WebX though put P fifty one. I don't know if

25:30they speak

25:31to the Penny for Pasco.

25:33Um

25:35I have a

25:35question on fifty six.

25:36Hang on for hang up for hang for one one quick second. Is there anyone on WebEx on P fifty one?

25:41Yeah, Paul Grebshaw.

25:43Paul, are you in opposition or support? Okay, nope.

25:51We're trying to promote him, just one moment.

25:59He needs to speak.

26:02Let's deal with P fifty one first. So P fifty one has to be pulled. It's an opposition.

26:06He's in opposition.

26:09Okay. Okay. Okay, and Commissioner Starkey just requested you pull fee P fifty six.

26:14All right, so I

26:16thought we

26:16already

26:16pulled 504.

26:18Yeah, pretty simple.

26:19All right, so poll P fifty one is pulled, P fifty four is pulled. No, no. Well yeah, I'm sorry, that would have read was sorry. Yeah. P fifty five is pulled, P fifty six, Commissioner Starkey you want to poll? Yeah, about the parts. And P fifty seven was pulled, which leaves

26:39Items P fifty two, P fifty three, P. That's it. That's it for consent. And so that's what the motion That'll be the motion? I move, yeah. Okay. Do we have a second?

26:51Okay.

26:52All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. Not to the pleasure of the board. Do we want to go right to the Saddlebrook hearing?

27:00Mr. Chairman Mariano P fifty four, fifty-five, and fifty-seven if have your indulgence.

27:06Let's go do that. All right, so item P fifty four.

27:12Hey, can we add P fifty one on that too? Is that the first thing I've got to do?

27:15I'm sorry. I'm sorry, to P fifty one first. Sorry about that.

27:18Thank you, Chairman Mariano.

27:24So I have Paul Grimshaw sign up in that position of P fifty one.

27:30So,

27:34I think that's a good question. So why don't why don't we hear from the uh person on public comment first then we'll get to the applicant.

27:42Thank you. Mr. True, you're okay with start leaving the staff's presentation.

27:45We don't need a staff for applicant presentation.

27:49Understood.

27:49Okay.

27:52So public comment on P51?

27:56And Commissioner February, um I'm told that folks are having a hard time hearing, so if we could speak into the microphones directly, that would be great. Thank you.

28:07Paul Paul Grinshaw is um signed up to speak WebEx.

28:15Yes, I just uh name it uh Paul Renshaw, uh G R I S A J W, I've been sworn in. Address is uh [address removed]. Um just I'm opposed to uh to this and um it's such a large scale change of agriculture uh to Uh yeah. And also Um just. Yeah, the one.

28:48Um obviously you can read for yourself, these are uh the immense benefits of agricultural region, um, huge financial benefits. Uh I'd like to draw your your attention just to uh you know the public service required for agriculture is not much lower than high density uh residential. Um government benefits are all are obviously huge as well. Um especially with uh um mitigating plug rates, absorbing CO2. And the other thing

29:18is just having food security, having agriculture in our region is super important. Uh next slide.

29:27Yeah. It's been uh promoted as uh you know the escape the urban areas and obviously uh massive rezoning um from uh from agriculture to uh you know high density residentials, uh obviously has an impact. Um next slide please. And then uh in the conference and planning there is really no uh mention of agriculture, even environmental services. So uh my fear is that this is just

30:02Yeah. Uh yeah uh Yeah, kind of.

30:13We're essentially recreating that congestion of of southern counties. You can see Captain County is 9.5% rural and you kind of uh as you go south you see what happens. So uh you know the intent to uh recreate this congestion and uh is there and all do we have percentage of greens mixing agricultural as he thank you.

30:38Um

30:38thank you. Commissioner Starkey.

30:41I I would just say to him as uh I I understand where you're coming from, coming from an AG family, and I think Senator Simpson or Commissioner Secretary Simpson uh has some great plans to preserve agriculture, but we can't force a landowner to stay in AG. So that's just not legally possible. But we do have a program in the county where we will buy land and preserve it if we have a willing seller. So we do all

31:11we can and we we thank you for that Penny for Pasco.

31:14Thank you.

31:15Uh the applicant.

31:17Uh Mr. Chairman Clark Hobby Hobby and Hobby PA 109 North Brush Street, Tampa, Florida have been sworn. Be very brief. You all are well aware that the 4G ranch is bisected by an eco-corridor that's proposed for the area. So to the discussion points raised here, we are changing 20% of the land area today. We're proposing to change it to conservation. So in addition to any other policies we may have which may preserve open space, green spaces,

31:47et cetera, it will be 600 acres or 20% of the property that can't be developed after the adoption of this plan amendment. So I think that addresses the issues. Happy to address any other questions.

31:58Uh I'm gonna bring up uh something you and I have talked about as well. Uh we talked about Commissioner Simpson's uh buying up of development rights to keep a a property agri agricultural. And I would like to see if the board feels the same way, that actually you you st you start that conversation before we go. We've

32:17already got a meeting schedule, I believe Mr Gibbons is meeting with their office uh later this week.

32:22'Cause I th I 'cause I think they could probably shorten up a lot of this growth, this this whole area and kinda take it and and just get what they really want for their own family, et cetera, and whatever else they're gonna do. But I think it'd be s you could minimize this here, but at the same time. I think with the Commissioner Simpson's program it could work very well for everybody.

32:40Understood, and we we want to explore that.

32:41Okay.

32:42Move

32:43to approve.

32:43Second. Any other discussion? Uh roll call vote.

32:50District one.

32:51Is it role follow or is it consent?

32:54This is a transmittal, so just regular vote.

32:56Okay, regular vote. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? All right. Thank you.