An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing for a Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 12) from RES-3 (Residential-3 Du/Ga) to IL (Industrial- Light) on Approximately 11.52 Acres of Real Property Located on the North Side of State Road 52 Approximately 0.15 miles East of Giddens Road; And a Map Amendment to the Future Land Use Map 2-9 Amending Subarea Map 2- 9(52) PAW Materials; And a Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Subarea Policy FLU 7.1.52 – PAW Materials; And Providing for Additional Text Amendments as Necessary for Internal Consistency; Providing for a Repealer, Severability, and an Effective Date

31:58Item P forty-six was published in the Tambay Times on May 3rd, 2023, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

32:07Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Item P46 is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two-fifteen, and sheet twelve, from res three residential three dwelling units per gross acre to IL Industrial Light on approximately 11.52 acres of real property located on the north side of State Road 52, approximately 0.15 mile east of Giddens Road. And a map amendment to the future land use map two-nine, amending sub-area map two-nine fifty-two PAL

32:38materials, and a comprehensive plan text amendment to sub-area policy flu seven dot one fifty-two PAL materials. And providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repeat layer serverability in an effective date. Uh this comes with the recommendation of approval, and we have staff to make a presentation if desired.

32:55Um you need a presentation.

32:58No, I just have a question. Okay.

32:59Question?

33:00Uh of the applicant.

33:01I don't have any public comments signed up for this.

33:05Let me just see if there's any public comment. Is there any public comment to I item P forty six?

33:10Mr. Chair, there's no one on WebEx and no one's signed up in on our form.

33:13Uh the applicant. Mr. Chairman Mariano.

33:18Hey. Um my question is and I know it's not on this property, but I just wanna make sure they know that w we're not gonna have any um chain link fences fronting fifty-two.

33:30I think there's a MPUD condition that prohibits that.

33:34Because there's one there now, but I assume they're going to be taking it out.

33:37Right. The the chain link fence that there will be uh that's supposed to be there and it's site plan approved is in the back, and that's supposed to be fencing off the heavy industrial area from the front. But over you know, when we start developing the frontage, that's retail development and it's in Interesting. Just this morning we had a conference call about some of their uses on the site and I was very clear to say don't forget you're marketing the front stuff for typical retail uses you cannot put

34:08too heavy of industrial stuff even though I one's allowed on the front partial because we'll never get the retail users in there. Yeah, we want them both. It's intended to have one row of retail and then IL, I mean I one stuff behind that.

34:23Well I mean true simulation is IL and Metler Toledo's IL, and I'd love to have that on the front.

34:31I'm just saying we have a broker that's you know, we've got a a hard corner with a signal there, so we're marketing some of the upfront stuff for retail. But yes. Understood. Okay.

34:41Thanks. Commission hang on, Commissioner Weightman?

34:43You know a question.

34:46Oh yes. How

34:46did I get so

34:47pretty?

34:48Yeah. Happy anniversary, Mr. Hobbin.

34:53So it's exciting to see we go from residential to Uh light industrial once again. Can we condition this thing? thing?

35:01Yeah, it the zoning already has a deed restriction. There's a companion zoning that that has that with them. So it won't be coming. It will not be.

35:12Good. Thank you.

35:14Okay. Thanks. All right. All right.

35:18Move approval. Second.

35:21Okay. Sometimes

35:26Can cement mixing go in light industrial. So do we have any place anywhere up there where

35:36Sement mixing does not go in I L. I L is typically enclosed spaces. I H.

35:43All right. Just I know that I've been contacted by people trying to find a site for Heavy and we we need to have Heavy some places as well. Because otherwise they're gonna be driving from Stay well fifty four or fifty two and airing. All the way up to the corners of the county.

36:00Commissioner, just you know there's a pending land use amendment near the Lime Rock Mines that is planned for having a lot of money.

36:06There is one, but I I would tell the board, and it's funny, we've got uh one of my consultant friends who's here who comes from that business, and we've spent a lot of time the last three years trying to find any site in the northern third of the easy. Of the county and we're having a major problem with several concrete companies. They can only keep the the stuff spinning in the back of the truck, I think it's for 50 minutes 5-0. And we're gonna have to find several other sites over time. I

36:36don't know where the right site is, and I know the board doesn't like to designate sites for heavy industrial, but whether we do them as MPUDs with a PD or whatever. Whatever, but this is a serious issue the board's gonna confront for some period of time.

36:50That's why I'm bringing it up

36:51because I was

36:51content.

36:54I mean I literally did Thomas Lange is here and he's probably spent five hundred hours looking at this. That's driving us insane.

37:02Thomas is who I talked to.

37:05Thanks.

37:05Joel's saying he may have one.

37:07Well you you probably should let Miss Woolheid speak because she she's got one. There there is one in the pipeline.

37:12Oh everyone's racing every

37:16All right. So this closed discussion, call the roll.

37:20District one, Commissioner Oakley.

37:21Aye.

37:21District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford.

37:28Aye.

37:29District 5, Chairman Mariano.

37:30Aye. Motion passes 5-0. Item P forty seven.