Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P76ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Greenfield Place West LLP/Greenfield Place West Rezoning – Change in Zoning from an A-C Agricultural District to an I-1 Light Industrial Park District – Northwest Pasco County – East Side of Softwind Lane, West of Suncoast Parkway, Approximately 1,250 Feet South of Shady Hills Road – Containing Approximately 297.036 Acres

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PDD-24-7696District 5

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda item P76 as revised with Commissioner Bradford absent from the vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 5, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 5, 2023

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PDD-24-7696 in full →

Heard once. PDD-24-7696 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Dec 5, 2023BoardP76Approvedthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 11 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Starkey

P seventy six was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times October fourth, twenty twenty three.

Denise

Item P76 is PDD 247696. This is a zoning amendment. I have some things to read into record corrections. First is that it's Greenfield Place LLC, not LLP. Greenfield Place West rezoning. It's for a change in zoning from an AC to an I-1 Light Industrial Park District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that preserves the uses to I one light industrial park district uses. So

um another change in the Memo is on page four or five of your memorandum. Finding a fact number 11B. The um totals are a little different. We did provide that to the clerk's office. So it basically states the proposed amendment to IL future land use would allow for a maximum development potential of Two million two hundred sixty one thousand three hundred six hundred and thirty-five square feet. That should be eight million five hundred and twenty thousand seven hundred and seventy-one point six square feet

of non-residential intensity. And then it should be called out again in the following sentence. And then the resulting in a net gain of approximately, it now reads 1,582,970 square feet of light industrial land uses. That should read 7,842,106.6 square feet of light industrial land uses. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval from. from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

OakleyVice Chair

Okay. Is anyone signed up to speak to this?

Starkey

There was no one signed up.

OakleyVice Chair

No one signed up. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak against this item? See a no one? General motion. Overcrawl percentage. This is protected, right? Yes, that is a voluntarily agreed upon D restriction.

Denise

Yes.

OakleyVice Chair

All those in favor say aye.

Weightman

Aye.

OakleyVice Chair

All right. Thank you. Motion passed four zero. Move on to P seventy seven.