An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 22) From Res 3 (Residential – 3 Du/Ga) To Res 6 (Residential – 6 Du/Ga) On Approximately 28.10 Acres Of Real Property Located At The Southeast Intersection Of Ashton Oaks Boulevard And State Road 54; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
OutcomeAdopted
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 9, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 9, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-24-0021 in full →PDD-24-0021 was taken up 2 times between Nov 2, 2023 and Jan 9, 2024. This is appearance 2.
- Nov 2, 2023PlanningPC9No outcome in the minutes
- Jan 9, 2024BoardP56▶Adoptedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 84% of 50 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
P-56 is advertised in the Tampa Bay Times October 18, 2023 and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Uh this item is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two-fifteen and she twenty-two from res three residential three dwelling units per gross acre to res six, residential six dwelling units per gross acre, and approximately twenty-eight point ten acres of real property located at the southeast intersection of Ashton Oaks Boulevard and State Road 54, and providing for additional technical. amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer serverability in an effective date. This
comes to you with a recommendation for approval and adoption of the ordinance by Will Coppel. Okay.
Can you can you put the map up for a second, Terry?
Oh yes.
No, closer.
Um is this your district, Commissioner?
Is this one?
Two. Okay.
Just wants to pay attention. Uh if you if you see that easement um to the south.
See that? Yeah, I mean you have uh you know my favorite word potential opportunity for a trail there and I I just hope you'll just like dig into your your district and see see what you can help create for your your citizens to have a wonderful quality of life around there. I think it said F P L on Mr. Uh on the map That I saw, but when I look at it, it it um it doesn't look like it's
under FPL ownership, but um
Florida Power or Florida Power.
I know it says F P L on the map that I was shown yesterday. Which doesn't make sense.
Not
near
not
exactly service
territory,
but okay. That's South Florida I think or other parts of Florida. Yeah. But I just wanna you know I I don't know what the master plan for connectivity of trails is in this area. But there's there are a lot of people moving in here and we should be doing something. And so when I see a corridor like that Um
is there a trail there somewhere already that you're drawing?
I have no idea.
I
don't know if staff could to show me what the planned opportunities are in this area. Um there's one along State Road fifty six, but I know nothing about what's going on on State Road fifty four.
There are trails that are planned for uh Chansey Road, which is further.
I saw that in the narrative on the one that just passed before.
And then just easily.
But you have to be able to get there.
Yes. Just west of this site at Fox Ridge Boulevard, which is uh
Should I connect up to if I'm looking at this correctly or listen listening to it?
So it just might be good for you to have a meeting with people um Commissioner Weightman and at the county and look at what opportunities might exist and and keep an eye on it before everything's gone. Um to
I appreciate that Commissioner but this this power line easement Terry this is from minor saying that's that's set
It's what? No, no, you can go so Duke is difficult to put a uh trail in, but my understanding is the other ones aren't. And when I looked up the ownership on Pasco property appraisers site that one of those easement was owned by the homeowners association of Ashton whatever. And I think that this one the one to the east is owned by the developer or the landowner.
Yes.
So um just saying More thought should be going into the region. Or some some plan. And here's an opportunity.
Yeah. Just something
you have to ask.
Terry, the companion rezon is not on today's agenda, is it? Uh I d I don't believe so.
Then then this discussion can can be had when when you're not in the comp plan stage but at the rezon stage.
No on
the
But it's into trail off duty, we don't need that.
It's it's not uh really affected today. I'm just bringing it to your attention on this opportunity.
All right. Uh entertain a motion.
Second.
And this row call vote.
Okay, District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Aye.
District one, Chairman Oakley.
Aye. Motion pass 5-0. Move on to P57.