Development Agreement (Regular) – Renner MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – KB Homes LLC – Proposed is a Modification to the Development Agreement (DA) for the Renner MPUD
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved Staff’s recommendation.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 23, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 23, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-24-0056 in full →PDD-24-0056 was taken up 2 times between Dec 5, 2023 and Jan 23, 2024, continued 1 time — this is appearance 2.
- Dec 5, 2023BoardP75▶Continued
- Jan 23, 2024BoardP49▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 17 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
P forty nine, proof of publication, Tampa Bay Times, October the 11th, 2023. The item was continued from the December fifth, twenty twenty three BCC meeting to today.
Good afternoon, William from Million Planning and Development. This is coming back before you guys today to show you the new Section C exhibit, which shows the twelve foot multi use path running along the north side of Bexley.
So if you'll remember last time there wasn't sufficient right-of-way on the north side of section C to accommodate for that 12-foot multi-use path. The applicant has worked in the interim to get that right of way to build the twelve foot multi-use path that will now run. through section A, B, and C of this new alignment.
And we tweaked the um trigger. For the CEOs I think within the development to help cover the cost.
I'm not sure. I was unable to attend the meeting and Terry attended it in my stead. Um so if the applicant knows something about that.
I'm I'm pretty sure we're good to go. But that's what they were requesting in order to To make this accommodation.
Thank you, Shelley Johnson, [address removed], and I have been sworn. We did talk to David about that and the M P D, the way the condition is written, we would have to go back and do an amendment to our M P D. Oh. So it the timing is just not gonna work by that time the road will be built. So We're good with Yeah, I know. We tried. We did try. And and he he and I talked for a while and tried to kick around ideas, but you know, we can't get it it says what it says. So Okay. Okay.
All right. Thank you. Um so this is something I took off because I I Uh y you know, I I had gone in depth on this project and I think it's good to go now.
Or is anybody uh in the public wish to speak to this item?
Uh I would move approval.
Second with discussion. Motion and a second
with discussion. With discussion? Okay.
Holmes has done all they've done to make this project happen. It was it was needed to make the connections But this is like Major improvements off site. Um so for them to step up and and make this extra move I want to thank them for doing that because otherwise it's not done. And of all the things I want you to all think about as we go forward, when we're looking for the developers that have these things that we need extra connections. that we should be looking to go push to to make things happen like this could be better. Yeah. I
agree.
We have to do our part So they're gonna connect to a sidewalk and then in front of our property that Miss Pearson is aware of our where we do our feeding Pasco's elderly or whatever or our elderly whatever, we have no sidewalk. So but it needs to be a trail. Multi use and then we'll come back and figure out the missing piece. But We don't have ours in there either, so
All right.
All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed like that? Motion pass five zero. That ends the public comment period. We'll move back to uh Commissioner Ottoms.