Zoning Amendment (Consent) - St Leo Commons VOPH MPUD - RDPD V LLC - A Rezoning Request From an A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow for 796 Dwelling Units and 75,000 Square Feet of Non-Residential Uses on Approximately 101 Acres

51:45Back to P forty-nine?

51:46Yes.

51:47Okay.

51:48So item P forty-nine was published in the Tampay Times on November 1st, 2023. The item was continued from the January 9, 2024 BCC meeting to February 6, 2024, BCC meeting. It was then continued to March 12th, 2024 BCC meeting, where it was continued to today.

52:04All right. I don't P49. That one we have expertise for Commissioner with Commissioner Oakley and Commissioner Weightman, and to the extent that they have not made it to the clerk's office, we will get those over to the clerk's office. So that is item PEG247708, zoning amendment, Saint Leo Commons, V O P H M P U D, R D P D 5, LLC, a rezoning request for from AC aggregation. Cultural district to an MPUD master plan unit development to

52:34allow for 796 dwelling units and 75,000 square feet of non-residential uses on approximately 101 acres. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet for both the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee and the Planning and Economic Growth Department. There is a specific condition related to the Lib Local Act, and that is condition number 80 in your conditions of approval.

53:10Okay. Um

53:12I'm pretty sure I met with them as well. So there should be an ex parte for me. I'm checking with my staff why these aren't going in.

53:23I would think you can talk to you about it.

53:30So Commissioners, I know you're in the middle of a public hearing, but if if it's okay with you, would you please ask for your legislative staff to or team to please send all the expertise over my way because then I will forward them to the appropriate team members. members. Yeah.

53:48because you're not getting them?

53:51Well, there have been two so far that it appears that I have not received. I know I meant with

53:56uh that's that's strange 'cause I've been there eight years, we've been sending those out. Okay. Thank you. I've

54:02run up with them as well.

54:03Yeah. So it's strange. We'll check with our assistants to make sure that's done. Okay. Um this is a public hearing.

54:14This is not the consent item. Um I do not have anyone signed up for this item and no one is on WebEx for this item.

54:21Oh okay. So is anyone here to speak against this item?

54:24Well I'd like a presentation

54:26Do what that?

54:27She wants it pulled off the consent agenda and wants a presentation.

54:31Okay. Pull P forty nine off. We'll come back to it.

54:40What's going on with these little things up here? Sh she's a court quitter to the recording.

54:44That was recording.

54:48She was here for another item.

54:49She was on P fifty seven, I think. Okay. I thought she can get it She got part of it.

54:54She got her part, so

54:56Item P fifty was published in the Tampa Times on February twenty-first, twenty twenty-four, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

55:04Item P50 is PEG 247743. It's a zoning amendment. Serene Preserve MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. EC Willow Bend LLC. It's for a rezoning from an ER estate residential district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow the development of 37 single-family detached homes on approximately 26.6 acres. Comes here with a recommendation of approval with conditions. as include included in your agenda packet from the Planning and Economic Growth Department and from the Planning Commission.

55:37Okay. Is there anyone from the public wish to speak to against this item?

55:42I have no one signed up and no one on WebEx.

55:45Okay, let it remain on consent. Move to P51.

55:49Item P fifty one was published in Tampa Bay Times on February twenty-first, twenty twenty-four, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

55:57Item P51 is PEG 247760, zoning amendment, New Clinton LLC. It's for a change in zoning from an AC agricultural district and R2 Low Density Residential District to an MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction to limit the use to a total of 105 townhomes and also um Um the use the similar It the it's actually incorporating the items

56:27that may be incorporated into a Euclidean zoning and a deed restriction for PM26. Those are have that have all been incorporated into the voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction. On this item, there are ex parte communications with Commissioner Mariano, Commissioner Starkey, and Commissioner Weightman. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee and from the Planning and Economic Works Department.

56:57Okay, is uh is there anyone this public hearing is anyone here to speak against this item?

57:03I have no one signed up and no one on WebEx for this item.

57:06And I see no one coming forward, so leave it on consent.

57:10I have a qu I'm sorry. I I have a quick question for this applicant and actually for the one before it P50, so I can't keep on consent. Sorry.

57:19Well

57:20but they won't be long questions.

57:21You are I understand, but the fact of it is these are all on consent because

57:25there's

57:25no opposition to them.

57:26Right.

57:28I right. But I have a very quick But

57:31it seems like the last couple of meetings you've been asking for 'em to be pulled off.

57:34Yes.

57:35So you can talk about 'em. But I would ask you the before look at our consent items so you go over 'em before we get here. It's it just helps in moving the time.

57:45Okay?

57:48Okay, so we'll uh since she has a question uh With fifty fifty one had to well you already We've already put it on consent on fifty. So Put fifty one over to the side and let's move forward to the next consent item of fifty-two.

58:06Ch Chair we pulled

58:07fifty

58:08and fifty-one. Yes. It's a very quick question.

58:11She's got a question, so we've already moved forward, but okay, pull both of them. Move on to P52.

58:18Item P fifty two was published in the Tampa Bay Times on January twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-four, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings. The item was continued from the March twelfth, twenty twenty-four BCC meeting to today.

58:30Item P fifty two is PG twenty-four seven seven six five. It's a zoning amendment, Demsey and Daughters Inc., Dempsey and Daughters for a change in zoning from an R2 low density residential district and a C2 General Commercial District to a C2 General Commercial District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction related to the Lib Local Act. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Economic Growth Department and the Planning Commission.

58:57Okay, this is a public hearing. Does anyone here in the audience wish to speak against this item?

59:03I have no one signed up for this item and no one on WebEx.

59:07Sure.

59:08Okay. Yes.

59:08I I'm okay with leaving this on consent. for commercial zoning, I just want to go on record that I I really hope this doesn't become a car wash. But I just want to say that even at all consent.

59:23I leave it on okay. No one to speak against it and leave it on consent. Move on to P53.

59:30Item P fifty three was published in the Tampe Times on February twenty-first, twenty twenty-four.

59:36On P53, this is the adoption for your amount, I'm sorry, this is your omnibus amendment. This is we are asking on this item that you transmit it to Florida Commerce and other reviewing agencies. I'll read the title. It's PEG 240011, it's a comprehensive plan amendment. CPA 2212, it's an omnibus text. Amendment providing for transmittal of the comprehensive plan tax amendments to the future land use element pertaining to industrial. K compatibility

1:00:07adjacent to wetlands, commercial infill development, and commercial location limitations, providing for tax amendments to the future land use element, appendix sections flu A4, calculations of residential densities, and flu A6, the official land use map, providing for text amendments to the conservation element pertaining to industrial compatibility adjacent to wetlands. We ask that you uh trans take public comment and authorize the transmitter of the amendment to the Department of Commerce and other reviewing agencies.

1:00:35Okay, this is uh a public meeting on this item. Um is anyone here to speak against this item?

1:00:44Mr. Chairman I have no one signed up and no one on WebEnd.

1:00:46Okay. Seeing no one coming forward, leave it on consent. Move on to P54.

1:00:52P54 is being pulled. There is someone here to speak on that item.

1:01:00So if we can move on to P fifty five.

1:01:04I also have someone signed up, but I don't know if they're enough. I believe they may have left, but um we can we can double check. Okay. Um Item P fifty five was published in Tampay Times on March twentieth, twenty twenty-four.

1:01:16Item P55 is PEG 240289. It's a DRI Development of Regional Impact Riscision. It's River Ridge DRI Development of Regional Impact. NG Development Corporation. It's a request to rescind the River Ridge DRI number 074, located generally north of Decubelis and east of Little Road. We're asking that you approve the rescision.

1:01:40Okay, did we do fifty four?

1:01:42Um we asked for it to be pulled because there's someone here in Office. Oh,

1:01:45it's pulled. Okay. I didn't even I didn't hear that.

1:01:49Sorry about that.

1:01:49Okay. Mr. Chairman. So we're on fifty-five. Is anyone here to speak against this item?

1:01:56I have three people signed up um Mr. Chairman I don't know if they're here to speak against

1:02:00the

1:02:00Mr.

1:02:00Are you here to speak against it or if you're here to speak against it, come forward. If not, it'll stay on consent.

1:02:09Seeing no one come forward. Um

1:02:12that concludes your consent agenda. That

1:02:14concludes the consent agenda

1:02:19Move approval the consent agenda. Okay. Got a motion second to approve consent agenda. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All right. Fast four zero. Now let's go back. We pulled um 49. P49.

1:02:40We've so we're gonna take each one of them as established we we've got P forty nine, P fifty, P fifty one.

1:02:49M fifty four.

1:02:56Okay.

1:02:59Good afternoon. It's Gavin Covey, Planning in Economic Growth. Um I know we asked for a presentation. Speaking of the mic, I can't hear you. I'm so sorry. Can you hear me a little bit better now? Yes. Sorry. Do we want a full presentation or is there some questions I can answer for you?

1:03:13Just that um I think I've worked on this one a bit with the applicant. Is she here?

1:03:18Yes, they are here.

1:03:20Uh we did a layout, right? Um I want that layout to be binding and if it's not it's not in here anywhere. Nowhere does it talk about that that I can see. I I was trying to see the updated um plan and I all I see is

1:03:41um colors but no No layout. Site plan, whatever whatever.

1:03:48Mr. Chairman Mariano Starkey, Clark Hobby, Hobby and Hobby, PA 109 North Brussel Street, Tampa, Florida, have been sworn. Uh Commissioner Starkey, we don't have enough on this particular project to make the site plan binding. But what we did do and what you saw, uh the reason why that's relevant in this one is we've basically created about five pages of conditions to force the form of development to meet that style. I'll give you just a few examples and I

1:04:18can go through a bunch of these if we need to, but we have to meet the Mutterum block Okay,

1:04:24because I don't have any of that that in here.

1:04:26It it's in our conditions of approval.

1:04:28I didn't get.

1:04:29Oh, you didn't get our conditions?

1:04:32Yeah.

1:04:33Well Christie's telling me condition fifty eight, just just so you know, we have a mutterum requirement for block sizing and no gating. That's one of the ones that we have. So You don't have the conditions at all?

1:04:47No, I don't. That's why I wanted the pres presentation.

1:04:50Conditions of approval are exhibits A, B, and C in your agenda.

1:04:54Okay, maybe my staff didn't print it out, but

1:04:58I I I c

1:04:59I I would assure you Commissioner Weightman. It's twenty

1:05:01it's twenty three pages.

1:05:03Yeah, that we we've spent four months creating the conditions.

1:05:09And and I'll just give you just a few of them. I won't bore the commission, but You must have vertically mixed use buildings. We created we used the most urban cross-section and V OPH for the entry road off of Curley. We then required certain buildings up off of that road and just to give you a sense of what we're dealing with, the sidewalks are seventeen feet wide on this cross section with on street parking. So we've created about a page and a half

1:05:39with regulations if there is any gas station Or if there is any uh uh car wash we're following the standards that staff is proposing on that and the ordinance is going to be coming before you so we've worked a a lot with Gavin, Terry and David on this to implement that.

1:05:58Can I ask you on when you say the sidewalk is seventeen feet wide, you mean there is enough space so that they can have outdoor seating and all that?

1:06:06Yes, yeah. It's called a sidewalk area and the typical I believe Is 56 AA or something like that. And it basically what it does is it puts the buildings up on the edge of the curve, then you have 17 feet of patio and sidewalk area, and then it goes directly to on street parking.

1:06:24I wanted the other commissioners to kind of hear what you've done to make this. a a great corner for for that area. So um and I think that From what you first showed us to where you ended up is so much better and that's why I wanted the public to see it.

1:06:42I I I I know this gonna seem self serving, but I'll give our client credit on this one. Christy and I told our client that in our opinion This is the most important corner for everything going into V O P H and it has to be done right and so staff worked us over to be sure. We spent many hours, you know, discussing these conditions, but our client ultimately agreed to all these design standards, so we're making sure it's being done the right way. Yeah. So we understand and we've

1:07:13changed. I wanna I went over this project, I think. Yeah. Yesterday. Yes

1:07:16sir.

1:07:17And a very good project and looks very nice. So

1:07:21much better than what we've got to do.

1:07:23It's a good project. Yeah. Thank Thank you very much.

1:07:26It's at the

1:07:26corner of uh McKay Yeah. Northeast corner.

1:07:31So it's got a little Kind of Town center and

1:07:37like a town center and and and non gated grid style. uh mixed use uh multifamily area behind it. Yeah

1:07:45right you know they're not you can't expect us to read twenty six pages of uh conditions for and us to really understand what we're voting on. So

1:07:56a picture sends a thousand words and if we just had the picture, is the picture in here?

1:08:01Uh it's in one of the exhibits in the presentation, but it's not in the MPUD conditions itself.

1:08:07Well that that was

1:08:09they've actually got on this corner they've got an actual road going in between the retail commercial and it really fits in and it's very walkable for the people that are l be living there.

1:08:19Yeah, it's a great improvement. Oh were you was someone getting ready to show something? Let's show it.

1:08:32Oh no, one picture notes.

1:08:33We don't need to go to the condition.

1:08:37We don't need the twenty three pages. I

1:08:39hope you're not putting a gas station on that corner.

1:08:42I

1:08:42don't know that we're going to, but if we do it be right up against the urban edge and walkable on the sidewalk. Yeah.

1:08:49He's got the gas station, that's all you need. Okay.

1:08:53Anyway, I'm good. So I need uh I need a motion on this item. Did you take public comment?

1:09:00Oh

1:09:00there we go. Is there any public comment on this item?

1:09:04I have no one signed up for P49 and no one on WebX.