Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Tall Timbers MPUD –Xtreme Team 41, LLC – Rezoning Request from an AC Agricultural District to a CC-MPUD Connected City Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of 380 Multi-Family Dwelling Units and 180,000 Square Feet of Non-Residential Uses and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 38 Acres, Located in Connected City within the Community Hub Special Planning Area.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Dec 12, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Dec 12, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-7651 in full →PDE-25-7651 was taken up 7 times between Nov 7, 2024 and May 6, 2025, continued 5 times — this is appearance 2.
- Nov 7, 2024PlanningPC2Continued
- Dec 12, 2024PlanningPC5▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Jan 9, 2025PlanningP8No disposition in the minutes
- Jan 14, 2025BoardAP139▶Continued
- Feb 11, 2025BoardP36▶Continued
- Mar 11, 2025BoardP39▶Continued
- May 6, 2025BoardP42▶Continued
No appearance of this case has a final disposition in the minutes. It was continued, or the minutes do not dispose of it in writing — which is true for 24% of items.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 58% of 26 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
PC five, PDE twenty five-seven six five one. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Tall Timbers M PUD Extreme Team 41 L L C. This is coming with a request to continue the item to the January 9th meeting in 2025. Um PC meeting in Dade City at 130 PM.
Is this a staff requested continuance?
Ooh, I believe it is.
I believe it is, but I can confirm that if you want.
Is the applicant available to confirm they're okay with their continuance?
Because we asked the applicant directly could they res when we made a motion for a continuance the last time we asked would sixty days be more applicable and they would be ready by today.
Um if you give me a so moment I can find out. Let me see if it's in their agenda podcast.
I think Patrick's coming to save the day.
Uh I I don't know about save the day, but maybe provide an answer. Um there were specific conditions that I think we needed to work out in terms of potentially timing of construction of the non residential components. Um and I think we're still working through what that condition looks like and I think between staff and the applicant we need more time to figure out what that looked like.
Okay.
So Patrick, just to confirm the applicant is okay with this continuous, I assume. Um because the the question was was this initiated by staff with the applicant? Was it
Sure. So and just to be quick, so Gavin, who was the the planner on this, he's out with the flu. Um so I'm kind of picking up the pieces a little bit on it. Um I'm not quite sure uh if it was applicant or staff requested. Um So I Is the
applicant aware of the continuance?
I believe that yes, it's been communicated to them. Okay.
Are they here or online now?
I do not believe they're here.
Okay. Right.
Okay. Is that all the continuance items? That
is the two continuance items, yes.
Move to continue items PC four and PC five to the January ninth meeting in Gate City. Second.
All right, motion and a second. Any further discussion?
Yeah. No,
I d I don't know if we asked if there was a comment. Oh
is there anybody here to speak on PC five? I'm sorry, you're correct, Matt. I did not
Just to be clear, since it was noticed as a continuum, you don't have to take public comment on it. Very good.
Okay, we have a motion and a second. No further discussion. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries.