Development Agreement (Consent) – Hamilton Oaks MPUD Master Planned Unit Development –Stephanie V. Benson, William D Brown, et al. – Proposed is a Development Agreement (DA) for Hamilton Oaks MPUD
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jan 23, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Jan 23, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-0082 in full →PDE-25-0082 was taken up 3 times between Jan 15, 2025 and Feb 11, 2025 — this is appearance 2.
- Jan 15, 2025PlanningPC5Approved
- Jan 23, 2025PlanningPC7▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Feb 11, 2025BoardP38▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 16 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Excuse me, Mr. Chair. I know that was your last item, but I'm being told I have to read a correction for PC seven, which was your consent item.
Our one consent item?
Our our one consent item.
I believe the subject line that I read into record needed to be corrected. Changing Stephanie V. Benson, William D. Brown, ETL. It should read, and I'm just gonna read it all over like I normally would. Um, PC7 PDE 25-0082, development agreement in the name of Hamilton Oaks MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. Um AMH development LLC proposed is a development agreement for Hamilton Oaks M P
U D. It should be reading AMH development LLC.
Do you Does somebody want a motion so that we approve it with the new name? I don't
I I don't know if you need to do a new motion. I just want to make sure it's on record. If you feel like there needs to be a new motion, I would defer to you.
I
mean you already approved the item.
Hopefully we wouldn't prejudice a case by who the
The only thing I would ask is when it gets put on the board agenda if you could just make sure it's got the correct name.
I will make sure Stop does that.
No William, you're not gonna use the correct name?
You're shaking her head no.
No mean yeah, science.
Okay. That's all I had for you. I guess we're we've done it then. I hear a motion to adjourn.