Zoning Amendment (Regular)- Arcola Shady Hills MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Daniel C.C. Lian – Rezoning Request from A-R Agricultural- Residential District to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of 186 Townhome Units and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 28.21 Acres Located on the North Side of Crela Drive Approximately 1,275 Feet East of the Intersection of Crela Drive and Shady Hills Road
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-7850 in full →PDE-25-7850 was taken up 2 times between May 15, 2025 and Aug 19, 2025 — this is appearance 2.
- May 15, 2025PlanningP8No disposition in the minutes
- Aug 19, 2025BoardP61▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
No appearance of this case has a final disposition in the minutes. It was continued, or the minutes do not dispose of it in writing — which is true for 24% of items.
What was said
Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 71% of 31 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay, now we're on to um sixty sixty
one.
Sixty one.
Um on sixty one Ms. Wilhite had offered up a condition. Um I didn't get the parameters of it. Do do you want Do you wanna delegate to the county attorney to come up with a condition or Do you want Barbara to put it on the record? Uh Um There is a We do need to make it clear that this is a this is the applicant offering this up
because of language in 163 that says you can't have payment before building permit. But I think If the applicant realizes the conditions in the area and they're offering it up as a voluntary commitment.
So yes, on behalf of the applicant, I will put that on the record that this is a voluntary commitment to be part of a solution. I'll just we'll work on the language, but the what it is is it's half the payment of mobility fees at the time of site development permit issuance and half of paym half of the mobility fees at the time of the CO for the seventh. built seventh unit, because we've got our one, our first six being the model center. So it's the seventh CO, which will be our second
building, that will pay the other half.
And
we'll work on the language.
Clarity. If our fees go up after you made the first payment, are you committing to pay the difference?
Because we're in the middle of a mobility fee update. So it's possible that the fees could increase from the time you made the half payment to the time they're actually due at CO.
That's a good question.
Well I'm asking. I guess
I wanna know what the commitment is.
Yeah, I mean I I'm not sure uh that's I think When we make the payments that's the feeble. We'll pay. Um
Well I'm only ra raising it because arguably we may get less money if we if you're not committing.
Okay. Well maybe we could figure out some language to address that so that we it's fair to us and fair to you and I It's hard for me just to do that right on the fly. We'll work on the language on that. Commissioner Oakley.
Yeah, I was just wondering if we could put that in the in the motion for approval that that be worked out between the county attorney or is that allowed or And that's
long as as long as there is enough specifics on the record, we can we can craft a condition that has been represented to the board if the board is comfortable with that, yes. That's what I'm asking.
And I can put on the record that I don't intend to write this condition so that you that you lose money. So we we can David and I can put our brains together and figure out how to write that, but It's not our intent to do this to prepay and end up paying less. So thank you.
Madam Chairman
Mariano.
I'm going to make a motion for approval. And part of it is the comp plan is now done. So as I said, you're more restricted to the zoning, so I think now it's more appropriate for that. Uh kind of like with Saddlebrook, I voted against it because I didn't like land use change, but when the zoning was when that was changed, then it it changed. So I'm going to mo uh support the mo uh support The uh recommendation by the board, uh by the staff, and with the conditions Barbara just stated, and just with as we
look at this redesign that we do look at closer that turnpike or lane that can change and other improvements for the intersections. Right.
I second that.
And uh uh under discussion, I I would not have supported this if it was res nine. I'm just saying that kinda to staff. But this is r like res five point something, six nine or something. So um six point six. I mean I mean it's five point six. What is it? Six point six. Oh, I think there might be a few.
A lot of times it fits in a nine, but it won't necessarily be a nine and it might be seven.
Nine would have been too much here.
Yeah.
Um Okay. So all in favor? Aye. Opposed? Okay. That one's done. I'm gonna check the number that's set in here because I'm for I wanna make sure we don't have an error.
All right, next one.