COPCN certification process and EMS advisory board
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 20 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Motion. Second. All in favor. Aye. Aye. All opposed, same side. Motion passes. Thank you. All right, we still have ten minutes. Um to do I guess we'll just go on to miscellaneous business and start with uh Commissioner Oakley.
Trying to think.
You have anything, sir?
I think I've been social distanced. So No, um I don't have anything today.
All right. Thank you, sir. Um Commissioner Starkey, do you want to get going?
Um I did um I'll probably take 'em all.
Well that's fine. We can really if you d listen, we and we can come back to you too after the time certain if we need be.
Um I did um Ha uh was contacted by one of my constituents who um Help. ha has an issue with our uh C O P C N process and I've been talking with Eric about this and I have some questions about our process because um Uh I'm not sure we're doing it the most efficient way and um So this is based on need. And uh and apparently
we just had two companies who applied for um I guess certification, I don't know what the word is, to come into the county And and they were their um The approvals were forwarded to the um board that oversees it, our voluntary board Who um unanimously denied it. And uh I've heard the administrator say that we're losing money because there aren't many transports, so I'm I'm wondering why we're even
going through that process. And um so I have that question to um So when I talked with Eric he said that that um Well all recommendations are forwarded to the board as if they um are recommended for approval, but it's up to it's up to the applicant to prove there is a need and they have to prove that to the board. But uh But when I circled back to um my constituent, they said that when Um Medfleet
applied, they were recommended denial and then they had to they had to really go through a lot of hoops to prove that they're they could show that there was a need. So I'm a little concerned about our process over there and also wondering why we have to do this every two y every year. Apparently we're doing it every year. So, um questions.
So the C O P C M process Those that get approved is a two year process. But somebody can submit an application any year. So we got some new ones this year. The medical board Yeah, I don't know the exact name for it. The EMS advisory.
And so our team reviews for adequacy and can they deliver what they're promising to deliver and then presents that material to the board.
And in what form do they present it? Do they s recommend approval or do they just say here's information?
I I think it is I might have to go back and validate because I don't sit on those board meetings and and I haven't seen the price. Ultimately this board gets to decide. you know, so they're they're an advisory board that makes a recommendation to you and then you get to decide whether to approve or disapprove. regardless of their recommendation. So Uh but the when somebody's approved it's a two year license and and then every two years we reevaluate to make sure that A the need exists and B they can still meet and deliver
the service. So that's that's the process.
I you know I I guess I w I want it to be consistent and I I want there to be a clear understanding of What that recommendation is coming from staff, whether um so is it really is it a recommendation or is it just here's some information? I think we have to be careful with that because I've heard that we've got we may have some discrepancy and I and like I that this is what I'm hearing from people who've been through the process and have minutes from the meeting. So um also I think Eric was gonna
check to see is is it our choice to do it every two years or is that a state statute or Uh so we don't have that answer yet.
Yeah, uh that process run by fire rescue. And so we will get the chief to work on that.
Yeah. Okay. Okay.