COPCN recommendations and approval process
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 19, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 8 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Great, thank you so much. And we're gonna go back to um. Mr. Wayne. Commissioner Starkey and hey com Commissioner Oakley I may be able to answer for you too. You're bringing up um About those C O N's C O
P C N
C O P N S C O
P
C N July fourteenth.
Those are on our consent agenda, if I'm not correct.
Correct. There were two Transport. That were recommended for denial. And then there were two uh for air. transport that were recommended for approval. So C eighteen and nineteen of that meeting.
Yeah. Okay. Um I just wanna dive into that process.