AGREEMENT FOR A UNIFIED SIGN PLAN (CONSENT) - Mishorim Gold Properties, LP & Mishorim Huntsville, LLC/Grove at Wesley Chapel MPUD - Establishment of the Krate Unified Sign Plan - Central Pasco County - Located East of Oakley Boulevard and West of I-75, Approximately 650 Feet North of Wesley Chapel Boulevard, Containing Approximately 7.1 Acres.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P114 and P116 by roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 8, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 8, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-0081 in full →Heard once. PDD-21-0081 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Dec 8, 2020BoardP114▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 6m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 48% of 42 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Taken up 2 times, not once through — set aside and returned to. Each stretch is below, in the order it happened.
1/2Taken up at Afternoon session, 29:20
yeah. Mr. Chairman no, never mind. Go ahead. Mm. You're on the wrong page? No, you're fine. You're
fine. Okay. Uh publication?
Yes. Item P fourteen was published in the Tampa Bay Times on November fourth, twenty twenty.
Good afternoon, Commissioner. Denise Hernandez, Planning and Development. P14 is PDD 210081. It's for an agreement for a unified sign plan. for Mishram Gold Properties L P and Mishram Huntsville L L C for the Grove at Wesley Chapel M PUD establishment of the Crate Unified Sign Plan. And this comes to you with a recommendation of approval of the agreement and the accompanying unified sign plan from both the local planning agency and the planning and development department.
Mr. Chairman Are you treating that as a consent item with the rest of them? Okay. So Mr. Chairman, that that is why I had You need we need to do the rezoning procedures if if we're going to if we're starting the consent agenda. So there are two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there is no opposition, the application will be considered by the Board without further presentation. If staff
or planning commission has recommended denial, or if there is opposition to the application, The applicant will be given five minutes for presentation. The opposition will be given three minutes for each individual, or five minutes for a group representative. and the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal. Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition of the rezoning may at this time request the petition be pulled from the consent agenda, in which case that application will be heard
under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to any petition, please give your name and address and whether or not you've been sworn for the record. These are quasi-judicial public hearing. The law in Florida is that mere public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action. Please limit your comments to those criteria found within the Board's Land Development Code. The
clerk will also need to swear people in.
Mm-hmm. Right. So it's time to swear that anyone that wanna speak to this item.
Okay.
Or these atoms.
If there's anyone here to speak on these items, if they could please raise their right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give? Is the truth so help you God.
And the answer was I do. So Uh with that, is there anyone here to speak to P114? Speak against fee one fourteen.
Um I have no one signed up on the WebEx, no emails for item P one fourteen, and also have been informed that there is no one at the kiosk for item P one fourteen.
2/2Taken up again at Afternoon session, 35:00
Uh P one fourteen and P one sixteen on the consent item.
So Second. Okay. I got a motion and a second by roll call vote.
District 2, Commissioner Moore.
Mr.
Chairman, if we can have a moment, please.
Um return down that and then this is the other if you go down there.
And we got on the fibers and then how to go.
Mm-hmm.
Ansley, if if you could approach for a minute.
The man. Does this one involve um the streets Runnell and those in Lakewood villas and Lakewood ranches?
This is uh the Bass Lake project? No,
this is Batm Lake, I'm sorry. This is
ones that is there.
Sure.
That's nice. Engineers at front.
Okay.
And then sample snows here.
It appears that that what the commissioner is looking at is an old memo from Diana Raleigh. I think this is showing all of the streets that were done as forced assessments. Mm. These streets may not all be within this project, but but it's an attachment to your memo for this project.
So you're talking about um Palm Lake or Bass Lake?
No project. No. Okay. That's a that's a future project that will be coming To the board. Okay. Okay.
All right. You can
you can you can
proceed. Thank you. Okay, we're at um We've got a motion and a second on P one fourteen and P one sixteen. Uh by roll call vote.
Um I already called District two, Commissioner Moore, and he was in favor. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Yes. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Yes. District five, Commissioner Mariano?
Bye.
District one Chairman Oakley.
Hi. Motion passed. Now Uh at this time we will take up When we move from consent is the item B one fifteen.
Yes, we have um two people on the WebEx for P one fifteen. We have a Christine Pasano.