37 in the published record, 0 in the recordings
In the record
Published agenda37 items
Published agendas and the dispositions the approved minutes recorded. Twelve years, whether or not a camera was running.
No item matched every word, so this matched any of them — most words first.
- Apr 2, 2019Planning
P2No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda - Feb 15, 2023Planning
P4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Development Agreement (Consent) – Boger Ranch Villages of Pasadena Hills Development Agreement – Boger Ranch, LLC – Development Agreement For The Boger Ranch MPUD to Design, Permit, and Construct Roadway Improvements In Exchange for Transportation Development Fee Credits.
- Oct 18, 2023Planning
P4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Hamilton Oaks MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Stephanie V. Benson, William D. Brown, et al. – A Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Maximum Development of 240 Single Family Detached Dwelling Units
- Mar 15, 2023Planning
P3No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Depue East MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Depue Ranch, LLC, et al – A Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural Zoning District to an MPUD (Master Planned Unit) Development District to Allow the Development of a Maximum of 2,300 Residential Dwelling Units and 20,000 Square Feet of Commercial on Approximately 931 Acres Within Villages L and M in the Villages of Pasadena Hills
- Mar 15, 2023Planning
P6No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – McCabe MPUD Master Planned Unit Development –Cornelius & Elizabeth McCabe – A Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural Zoning District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow the Development of a Maximum of 470 Residential Dwelling Units on Approximately 69 Acres within Village B of the Villages of Pasadena Hills VOPH.
- Mar 15, 2023Planning
P8No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Hopkins MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Dwight Hopkins Revocable Trust – A Rezoning Request from AC Agricultural to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of a Maximum of 144 Single Family Dwelling Units on Approximately 97.7 Acres.
- Sep 21, 2022Planning
R3No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Smith 80 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Smith Cattle & Grove, Inc. – A Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural Zoning District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of a Maximum of 160 Residential Dwelling Units on Approximately 80 Acres
- Jul 27, 2022Planning
W3No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code Section 602, J "Ben" Harrill Villages Of Pasadena Hills Stewardship District, Revisions To Text, Tables, And Exhibits; Text Revisions To Single Family Lot Chart And Section 602.10.E.6 (D) Volume Over Capacity (V/C) Ratios Greater Than 1.2 At Intersections; Table Revisions To Exhibit 602-C Transportation Development Fee Schedules; Revisions To Exhibit 602-D Property Owners Credits; Map And Table Amendments To Exhibit 602-E Master Roadway Plan; Add New Cross Section 60AA, And Revised Illustration of Cross Section 70AA To Include Family Bike Paths, And Amending Other Sections, As Necessary, For Internal Consistency, Providing For Applicability, Repealer, Severability, Inclusion Into The Land Development Code, And An Effective Date.
- Feb 16, 2022Planning
P4No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Chapter 600 Overlay And Special District Areas; Section 602.8 M.3: Village of Pasadena Hills (VOPH) Impact Fees, Mobility Fees And Development Fee Surcharges and VOPH Transportation Development Fee Schedules (Exhibit 602-C); And Other Amendments As Necessary, For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Severability; And An Effective Date.
- Sep 29, 2021Planning
P2No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Plazewski MPUD Master Planned Unit Development, Villages of Pasadena Hills – Walter T. Plazewski – A Rezoning Request from an A-R Agricultural-Residential Zoning District and an AR-5 Agricultural-Residential Zoning District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow the Development of a Maximum of 200 Single-family Detached Dwelling Units and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 40 Acres
- May 19, 2021Planning
P1No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Chapter 600 Overlay And Special District Areas; Section 602.8.T: VOPH Development And Administration Review Fees; And Map Change To Exhibit 602-E VOPH Master Roadway Plan Exhibit A Tyndall Road / East West Street A Right Of Way Realignment; And Other Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Severability; Inclusion Into The Land Development Code; And An Effective Date.
- Sep 23, 2020Planning
P2No disposition in the minutesPublished agenda TEXT, TABLE, AND EXHIBIT AMENDMENTS TO THE ADOPTED VILLAGE OF PASADENA HILLS (VOPH) FINANCIAL PLAN TO INCLUDE UTILITY MASTER PLAN, UTILITY DEVELOPMENT FEES, AND RELATED REVISIONS; TEXT AND FIGURE REVISIONS TO THE 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CHAPTER 2 FLU 6, INCLUDING REVISIONS TO CORE RESERVE, VILLAGE SEPARATOR PROVISIONS AND EXISTING DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS; TEXT AND EXHIBIT REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 602 – J “BEN” HARRILL VILLAGES OF PASADENA HILLS STEWARDSHIP DISTRICT RELATED TO UTILITY MASTER PLAN, DEVELOPMENT FEES AND POG CREDITS – comprising Phase 2 revisions to the 2020 VOPH Update Study Memorandum PDD20-0667C
In the room
Transcript0 moments
Machine transcription of 283 recorded meetings — 9% of decided items have one. Speaker names are inferred from voice and can be wrong.
Nothing in the recordings matches economic development incentive
. Most meetings have no recording, so a result of zero does not mean the county never discussed it.