PDD-21-0499

Every appearance5 of 5 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 96% of 161 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Jul 22, 2021
   Planning CommissionPC10Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Open this item →▶ Play from 24:42
   ▶ 24:4225m

   Denise

   24:42The next item on your agenda is PC 10 PDD 210499, and this is a presentation by Mr. Bill Oliver. And if you give me a minute, I will tee that up.

   GirardiVice Chair

   24:54Are you doing items pulled first? Are you doing the items pulled first or are you doing that first?

   GreyChair

   25:00Um What does first?

   Bill Oliver

   25:08All right, to save time, I'll go ahead and introduce myself. I'm Bill Oliver. I'm a registered professional engineer in Florida. probably most notoriously known in Pasco County for un undertaking your transportation impact fee and mobility fee studies in twenty eleven, fourteen, twenty-eight, and now twenty twenty one. And that's the purpose of the presentation today. Um we're taking a proposed change to the Mobility fee ordinance. This thing's kinda sagging here. There we go. Uh to uh planning

   25:38to go to the County Commission uh in their August tenth meeting. And so this is a presentation to you all for questions and your recommendation. And if you'd like to go to the first slide. Typically when I undertake a study, the first thing I look at is what's changed since the last study that we did. Because the rate of growth, the transportation plan may change, revenue forecasts may change, population growth may uh population growth may change. So I'll spend a few s a couple of slides talking about that and then talk about the uh recommendation

   26:09that the staff is bringing to you today for adjustments to that plan. Or to the to the fee program. Just one slide on a brief history. Um You've had uh transportation impact fee since 1985. Uh in Pasco County in 2011, we changed to a mobility fee strategy. Um the key changes there was were that we created three districts in the county, an urban district, suburban district, and a rural district. And

   26:40tailored the fee to reflect differing goals and mobility solutions and intent in those three districts. The rural district had the highest fees, suburban district had the next in the middle fees, and then the urban district had the lowest fees. And that reflected a willingness to accept more congestion in that urban district and shorter trip lengths and so. The rural district having longer trip links, wanting better quality of service, resulted in the need to construct more infrastructure

   27:10and higher fees. Um We also in that program created incentives. The comp plan is seeking to incentivize and attract employment land uses to the county. In that fee program, we basically said we will that the county would fund the mobility fee obligation of office land uses, industrial land uses, and lodging land uses as being the three key sectors of the economy where uh that

   27:40the county was seeking to in uh incentivize. The fees have largely remained unchanged since 2011 in the face of higher growth, higher costs, and so forth. And the reason you're able to do that was because you've uh in that process adopted the uh second local option gas tax, five additional pennies of gasoline tax that go towards the expansion of the mobility system. uh also was the enactment of a uh tax increment uh property

   28:10tax increment district countywide to help also fund transportation. W uh in the 2018 adoption process, I remember advising the Board of County Commissioners at that time. We're running out of options. Um and so we thought uh the the thought was at this go round there would be some adjustments that have to be made. So we'll talk about those here in a second. Um Yeah, and the mobility free fee program that's in place generates about $28 to $30 million

   28:41per year. Um that was uh at current estimates uh that would be about twenty-two percent of the financing need for your transportation plan.

   28:53Next slide, please.

   28:57So in the process of doing this study, uh the Florida State Legislature passed uh legislation which restricted or limited the s the the method or the style in which you could amend and change your impact fees. It applies to all impact fees, not just mobility fees. But there are kind of two strategies. The lower one that can increase by more than 50% fee if you have a fresh study justifying the need for

   29:27a dramatic increase in your mobility fees or impact fee. requiring also a two-thirds majority of the Board of County Commissioners vote to actually adopt and implement it and a finding on their part of extraordinary circumstances. We didn't think that was in the circumstance we're in. So we're taking the more uh the the the less dramatic approach of just uh uh allowing what what one increase in the fee every four years. Um And during that four-year window, the legislature limited

   29:57uh increases to a maximum of 50% in four equal steps. Um if you were if your proposed increases were only up to 25%, then it was required that they that those changes be implemented in two equal steps over two years. And then um Well, and that and and that the y that your fee program could only be altered or changed once every four years. So the change we're making now. It's supposed to last us for four years unless we find extraordinary circumstances.

   30:28Next slide, please.

   30:31Not surprisingly, as usual, the costs of implementing your mobility system have increased over recent years, and according to the Florida DOT, we expect those costs to continue to increase by about 3% per year over the coming four or five years. So that's a ch uh the cha a change in uh the fee program since last year. We have to recover greater costs. Next slide, please. We also look at the growth rates of

   31:01travel and also the revenues that you have coming in, not just from mobility fees, but from gas taxes, sales tax, and your tax increment district. in this transportation plan update that was adopted uh I think uh last year. Compared to the 2018 study, the rate of growth that you're expecting in travel has decreased. Less population growth, less travel growth. So that's good. That means you have to build less infrastructure to accommodate it. Um

   31:32but um Even with the higher costs, that reduction in growth reduced the amount of revenue needed by about 10.6%, which is good. On the in the green box, uh looking at thinking about revenues, uh by and large, those non-mobility fee revenues, the sales tax, the the tax increment district, and motor fuel taxes across the board stayed about the same. Slight reduction because of the growth rates slowing down a little

   32:03bit. Um But uh so the total revenue needed from mobility fees is also less than we anticipated in 2018. But With a slower growth rate, there's less growth from which those reven those mobility fees would be are generated. So uh in in after all of that mathematics, by um bottom line is the mobility fee rates do need to increase, not as dramatically

   32:33as I had thought back in 2018.

   32:37At the outset of our study, we had individual interviews with each of the county commissioners exploring different strategies for how to approach the mobility fee adjustments that are coming up. and these are the um indications. or the issues and the feedback. The numbers at at the end of each line in in parentheses kind of indicated how many of the five commissioners were in favor of that particular strategy. So there was strong support, four and

   33:07a half out of five. Uh one commissioner was kind of, yeah, yeah, maybe, but maybe not. We could uh she they were willing to reconsider uh that option. But to keep you you've incentivized uh forms of development, your mixed-use travel reducing measures form of development, which is slightly higher density than your standard form of development. uh the traditional neighborhood development, transit oriented development are discounted. Uh the mudderum by twenty five percent. The TND by 50%, the

   33:38transit-oriented development is discounted by 75%. So there's strong uh and strong support of keeping those discounts and those relationships in place. Um four out of the five were also willing to consider reducing the retail incentives, uh allowing the retail development to uh fees to increase by a more substantial margin than perhaps others. The next three about reducing lodging incentives, the office and industrial

   34:08incentives, and even single family, only one out of the five were willing to consider that. So there was very little support for those types of changes. Two other ideas emerged. One was to create an incentive for locally owned small businesses, which I'll talk about s subsequently. And uh secondly, the interest in identifying or providing a separate fee rate for accessory dwelling units, which I'll also talk about in a few minutes. And I should probably add that I noted David Goldstein

   34:38is in the video, so I should pause every now and again because David is always in eager to add a few notes that I may have forgotten to address. address. So I'll take a deep breath and let him great

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   34:50Bill.

   Bill Oliver

   34:51You're doing fine. Okay, good. All right. So that so that so that guidance is what kind of gave us direction on what uh on what sector, if you will, of the development economy uh we would look at to generate the uh additional needed revenues or the fee increases. So this slide kind of reflects the previous slide, and here's where we have settled after doing the math. We're going to continue the existing full incentives

   35:22or zero fee for office industrial lodging and the geographic area on the western edge of your county known as the West Market area. uh the retail fees were kind of what took the increase. Um that's where we uh allow we're allowing the retail fees to increase basically by about fifty percent over the four ye four years in equal steps. So annually about a thirteen percent increase on their fees. Multifamily apartments, the

   35:52Board of County Commissioners has taken action to eliminate incentives for multifamily, asking them to pay the full standard fee rate, non-incentivized. Um and that uh strategy, they just did that last year, last May or June. Um, and so that uh strategy is continuing. Uh the locally owned small business fees uh proposed that those fees would be the same fees as the traditional neighborhood development rate or giving them a 50%

   36:23discount. um on their sh the otherwise uh rate that they would pay. We're gonna continue the zero subsidies for also for many warehousing and mining land uses. And then all other fees, the the residential, single-family residential, uh institutional fees, recreational fees, other land use categories that I've not mentioned above, would basically basically be indexed over the next four years at about a 3.13%

   36:53per year increasing rate to kind of align with the uh DOT's expected uh Cost increase rate.

   37:04Next slide. Okay, a bunch of numbers here, and I love this slide, but I don't think a lot of other people do terribly much. But in my mind, this slide summarizes what your transport currently adopted transportation plan says in the blue box. There is a certain amount of certain amount of travel that is occurring today. Th there are growth rates, differing growth rates in the urban, suburban and rural district. Um in the yellow line there's an indication of

   37:34what quality of service you intend to provide or at what rate you intend to construct uh mobility system capacity. Um in the urban district, uh building at a rate of 0.95 times the rate of growth. The suburban district 1.25, the rural district 1.33. These are the same, it's the same commitment to quality of service that existed in the 2018 mobility fee program. So no change there. Costs have changed. So when

   38:04you multiply the quantity of growth times the cost. The bottom line in the blue box on the far left says that over the 25-year horizon, you're needing about $3.1 billion of revenue to fund the program. In the green box, we're looking at the revenues, the different sources, the second local option gas tax, penny for Pasco sales tax, and so forth, and how much revenue we expect to come from those sources, and then how much revenue we're looking for the mobility fee also to

   38:34generate. And then in the orange box, uh the fee rates that would be implemented after the four-step adjustments, the fee rates that would result in 2025.

   38:49Next slide.

   38:52So again, more numbers here, but I'll take a minute to kind of walk through this slide. This basically in all of our analysis we view six example land uses, and those are listed on the left-hand side: the single-family, the multifamily, the apartments, uh, the hotel units, the office, uh, retail, and industrial land uses. And then under each of those lines, uh the fee rates that would be in place for the in the urban district, the suburban district, and the rural district. Uh the four

   39:23major uh columns, if you will, as you go horizontally, um indicate the form of development. The first column dealing with standard development uh forms, uh the second column being your mixed-use trip reduction measures development, the third the traditional neighborhood development. And also, what's uh the acronym there is LOSB, the Locally Owned Small Business Fee Rates. And then the last column being the transit-oriented development. And then within each of those major columns, the first column

   39:53is the fee that that land use would be paying today in twenty twenty one. And then uh f in the twenty twenty-two, three, four, and five would be the fee rates they will pay in those calendar years.

   40:09Um, and you can kind of see the strategy. The standard fee rates are where the where the most significant changes occur. Um, the residential uh increasing by about three percent per year, the apartments growing by about 12 or uh No, about six percent it was actually six percent per year with that zero percent incentive. Um office and uh Hotel remaining at zero dollars. The retail rates is where you

   40:40see the most dramatic increases in the standard fee rate uh increasing by about thirteen percent per year up to fifty percent after four years. and then the zero fees for the industrial. If the development though, if if the retail development, for example, is in the Mudram district, uh its fee would only be indexed at the three point one three percent per rate year, maintaining that incentivized uh uh uh are the incentives for that form of development. So

   41:11the standard retail will be increasing at 13% per year, but if your retail is in Mudderum, TND, or the TOD, you'll only see about you'll you'll see uh only about three percent per year indexing.

   41:27All right, next slide.

   41:32Uh the locally owned small business discount. Uh this is the proposed definition that's in the proposed ordinance. It's basically uh a business that's fifty-one percent owned, not a chain. Um uh fifty one percent owned uh by people who live in Pasco, Hernando, Sumter, Polk, uh and Hillsboro. Oh Pas Pasco plus your adjacent counties. Um and having twenty-five or fewer employees.

   42:03Uh David, I don't know if there's something anything else you wanna talk about there.

   42:10Since we're going to do that,

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   42:11you covered it, Bill. There it's a reduced rate, so it's paying about half what a standard fee would pay.

   Bill Oliver

   42:20And then the accessory dwelling unit, the proposed rates are here. And then an accessory dwelling unit is basically what I refer to as a mother-in-law quarters. You may build a very, very small, like one-bedroom house or on top of your garage or stand alone in the yard. It's got to be a primary uh single-family dwelling unit on the primary lot. Um With a limitation of 900 square feet, my gut tells me you'll be running into these units on the 400 to 650

   42:50square foot range, but went we went to 900 square feet because three-car garages are becoming popular and that's what would fit on top of a three-car garage, more or less. And you can see in the fee schedule here, the first column is the 2021 fee rate. Uh today, if such a unit is built, they would pay, uh the county is charging the apartment uh trip generation rate, which is uh as you can see there in that first column. We went through an assessment

   43:20of the estimated traffic generation for this site, for this type of a land use, concluded it was probably lower than the apartment and a reduction in this fee rate is appropriate. the fee rates that you see there are what would be paid in the urban, suburban and rural districts.

   43:41And next slide, this is the comparison of the proposed 2025 Pasco County fee rates with those of the adjacent Hillsborough County, City of Tampa, Polk County, and Manatee County. Um

   44:03Not much to say there. Hillsboro County, um, we know their fee rates are in effect through December 31st of this year. Uh I know they have great interest in increasing those fee rates as they can. Uh City of Tampa has been adopted their fee program quite a few years ago and these rates uh are what they are willing to charge. uh not as fast growing a community. Um But by and large, Pasco County's fee rates are comparable to Hillsborough County's,

   44:33slightly less in some cases, slightly more in other cases.

   44:39Accept great benefits in hotel, office and industrial, of course.

   44:46Um and to conclude, yeah, the anticipated adoption dates for this fee program at the Board of County Commissioners will be August 10th for the first reading, August 24th for the second reading. This fee program is anticipated to go into effect beginning January 1st of 2022. So if y'all have any questions, I'll be glad to entertain them.

   GirardiVice Chair

   45:10Bill, I I just had one question and I again I haven't I only started looking at this stuff yesterday, admittedly. I haven't gone through all the categories, but I guess can you give some explanation as I look through the different mobility feed districts There are different increases for mini warehouses and boat and RV storage. In some cases mini warehouse gets put in that seven percent increase. Another and Bowden R V gets putting a thirteen percent for the retail. In other cases they're three

   45:41percent. Like immobility fee district B? In C it's seven percent and thirteen percent. So I don't know what is their Justification or reasoning for those differences or is that just something that hasn't been looked at and needs to be looked at closer?

   Bill Oliver

   45:53Um The I uh I uh yeah, I would need to go back and look at it more closely to respond specifically to that question. To some extent, um the House Bill three thirty-seven limitations requiring us to do equal steps. Has kind of twisted some of those growth rates and so forth. Okay. However, I do know that the uh the Board of County Commissioners was not interested in subsidizing

   46:24many warehouses at all. Um whereas boat and RV storage, I don't think has.

   GirardiVice Chair

   46:32I mean I understand that. It's just that it's not a uniform increase across all the mobility fee districts. I mean some places it goes up six percent, some pla seven percent, some places it goes up three. And then Bolton R V storage it goes up in thirteen, seven and three, I think. Or thirteen, seven and thirteen. So it's it there's no it's just not uniforms. I didn't know if there was a reason why. I know this is a real use. I mean Units are getting smaller, there's more apartments. I know apartments are a hot topic in the county. Um but I mean people need places to store this stuff. I mean we're

   47:02a coastal community, you need places for boat and R V storage. Yeah. So

   Bill Oliver

   47:06that one's keep that one's catching me a little flat footed. Sorry. No problem. If But realistically because Yeah, I think it has to do with the the goal of preserving fee rates from 2011 through 2020 or through 2018 anyway has caused some of those subsidy discounts to be different. That resulted in the steps increasing steps probably

   GirardiVice Chair

   47:37Okay.

   47:37Very Very good. That was the only question I had. I mean good job. I mean it's a great presentation, understandably. I mean I know that You know, costs are getting I mean things are getting more expensive. I mean there needs to be increases, so I understand.

   GreyChair

   47:51Are there any other questions?

   47:54That's right. Well are you recommending that we continue it doing

   GirardiVice Chair

   48:00it I'm fine. I'll make a motion to approve.

   Denise

   48:04Public hearing.

   GirardiVice Chair

   48:05Oh

   Denise

   48:08It's a public hearing item. This is an ordinance.

   GirardiVice Chair

   48:10Okay.

   Denise

   48:11So you have to open it for public comment.

   GirardiVice Chair

   48:12Yeah, you gotta have yeah. I can't make a motion yet, but yes. No, I'm fine with it. I just I I think that that part needs to be looked at, s is my main point. I mean, just before it goes to the board, because it's gonna go to the board for approval anyways. Yeah.

   Denise

   48:27So for the record today you're acting uh you're sitting as the LPA and what's being requested is for you to find the um the proposed um amendments consistent with a comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.

   GreyChair

   48:41All right. So is there anybody else here from the public that's uh interested in speaking?

   48:50I see no one. Did anybody have their hand up that I can't see?

   48:56Okay. So if not, then do I hear a motion?

   GirardiVice Chair

   49:00Make a motion to approve. That's a second.

   GreyChair

   49:04We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion of the motion? All in favor? Signify by saying aye. Aye. Uh like sign for negative. Motion carries. Okay, thank you very much. Good job.

   49:23Um Denise, I'm gonna go back to the uh items that were

   Denise

   49:28Okay, thank you so much.

2. 2Aug 10, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP113Public hearingContinued

   Approved minutes

   Continued to the September 15, 2021 Board of County Commissioners meeting time certain at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 4:43
   ▶ 4:438m

   OakleyChair

   4:43Aye. Motion pass 4-0. Uh P one thirteen.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   4:49Item P one thirteen was published in the Tampay Times on July eighteenth, twenty twenty one.

   Denise

   4:55On uh P one thirteen, this item, um, should I read it by title? This is the first reading on the item, and Mr. Bill Oliver will have a presentation on the item. Okay. D twenty one zero four nine nine, an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Section 1302.

   5:18Owned small businesses to amend the mobility fee regulations to be consistent with Chapter 2021-63 laws of Florida and other amendments as necessary to ensure internal consistency, providing for applicability, repealer, severability, inclusion into the land Pasco County Land Development Code, and an effective date. And again, Mr. Bill Oliver will uh have a presentation on this item.

   OakleyChair

   5:38Okay.

   Bill Oliver

   5:43Good afternoon. Um We're here to present to you recommendations of staff for the adoption of the or update of your mobility fee program. Um I was I've participated in this study since uh 2011, uh original adoption 2014 update, 2018 update, and now the 2021 update. Um somebody's advanced a slide extra here. Back up one, please. There we

   6:13go. So typically what I like to do in these presentations is summarize what has changed since the last study was up and fee schedules were updated, and then we'll pres- I'll present to you what the staff's recommended action is for you as it is in the ordinance. Next slide, please. And a brief history. The most significant point on this particular slide is item number C, which is underlined. Uh you have held your mobility fees constant, essentially, with few adjustments

   6:43here and there, but mostly unchanged since the year 2011 fee was adopted. And you've been able to do this because you adopted a second local option gas tax, you've implemented a tax increment uh financing district countywide to help fund transportation needs. Um and somewhere in the Record of adopting this fee back uh updating this fee in 2018, I made the comment that we can't keep holding these fees constant forever. Um

   7:14and so this year is the year in which we do need to make some adjustments in order to fund your transportation plan at your goal levels. So um your f fees Ms.

   Mariano

   7:27Short Yes. Can I s stop for just one second? So didn't we just cut our mobility fees back because we're had enough collected?

   County Administrator

   7:35No sir, you've added flexibility into your TIFF funding program. You haven't touched your mobility piece.

   Fitzpatrick

   7:45Do you know what

   Double Scram

   7:45I'm saying?

   Fitzpatrick

   7:47Mr. Chairman M didn't we provide an additional incentives or adjust the incentives on the mobility fees?

   Bill Oliver

   7:54You did and that's coming up, I think. So

   7:59in

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   8:00twenty twenty you did add additional incentives for the West Market area and for affordable housing, at the same time that you increased the fees for apartments. That was that occurred in twenty twenty. Does that answer your question?

   Bill Oliver

   8:17Yes.

   8:21And that was item D on this slide.

   8:26Minor adjustments in twenty twenty. Next slide please. So one of the things that changed in during the course of this study was the Florida stat uh legislature adopted what's called House Bill 337. Uh the House Bill basically limited the ways in which mobility fees and impact fees across the board could be increased over time. There were two general categories of how this could happen. If your fee increases

   8:56were proposed at less than 50%, they had to be in certain prescribed steps. It was possible to increase your fees by more than 50% if you had a totally fresh study, and the Board of County Commissioners found extraordinary circumstances. and had a two thirds majority uh vote vote. Pasco County felt it was in the first position where basically over the next four years he'll be adop he Over the next four years, your

   9:26mobility fees will be stepwise increased, uh one quarter step each of the four years between now and 2025.

   Moore

   9:35I'm gonna stop real quick. Sorry, apologize. I I I'm gonna make a motion to continue this. I don't nobody met with me on this item. I was gonna let it go for a while. I see faces, I watch faces. I did I I think we should all be briefed on this.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   9:52So so Commissioner, can I there actually was a meeting it was it was a while ago. It was been a while six months ago and there is a slide that talks about the results of those one on one uh meetings with the commissioner.

   Moore

   10:04I'm just I'm I I understand. I don't know what's I'm just a little concerned that it's been so it's like we I remember discussions in the past. It was we haven't we didn't have a meeting geez. Well six months ago, so we haven't had one recently. I don't know.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   10:20That's up to the board. I

   Moore

   10:21just say there are a

   10:22lot of people.

   10:22I think you should meet if if the rest of it I don't know if you anybody met with the rest of the commissioners over the last, you know, two or three weeks, but if not, I I think you should have one on one meetings with all of us and then bring this back. That's my opinion.

   Mariano

   10:34Mr. Mariano. I I agree a hundred percent because I I tell you I hate to ask that question I asked right off the bat because literally we just looked at our transportation, we just looked at our tax increment part, and we cut it back to give us flexibility. That tells me that our impact fees are okay. Um my first my first gut reaction when I look at it. When you talk to other people around Pasco, you know, we've got the highest uh impact fee around. I don't think I need to be any higher based upon having d done a cut

   11:04over there. So maybe a one-on-one might change

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   11:07my mind. I'll listen to it. We can meet one on one. They're not as significant of an increase as you think. They're like three percent increases per year. So and I thought the county administrator discussed of these with you in his one on one meetings as well. We'll meet with you again. So that's fine. No, and

   Moore

   11:22mister Mr. Chairman Mari David, I appreciate I remember the meetings we did have Mr. Moore six months ago or so. It just it's been so long. We've been it through a lot in six months. I I really prefer that if we have that meeting aga we may all be we may all meet agreement when we step back up here, but I think um staff, Mr. Biles, your s team needs to probably set those meetings up.

   OakleyChair

   11:48Well do we get time and bring it back give you time to speak to all the commissioners?

   County Administrator

   11:53The 915 meeting in Dade City.

   OakleyChair

   11:56Okay. That's you with everybody? September fifth? Okay. You wanna make that motion or

   Moore

   12:01I'm I'll move to continue the sign.

   OakleyChair

   12:03Second. Okay. Got a motion second. I'll move

   OakleyChair

   12:06in place. So that's that's to a that's

   Moore

   12:08to a time certain yes sir.

   OakleyChair

   12:10Time

   Moore

   12:10certain nine fifteen?

   OakleyChair

   12:12Nine fifteen is Yeah. One thirty or soon thereafter maybe or thank you. Okay. Yeah. All right, thank

   Moore

   12:19you. Thank you. I just knew we we're gonna have a lot of date on the just the opening that does it probably need to have

3. 3Aug 24, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP83Public hearingContinued

   Approved minutes

   Approved to continue the item to the September 28, 2021 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 3:23
   ▶ 3:23under a minute

   StarkeyVice Chair

   3:23Item P eighty three was published in the Tampe Times on July eighteenth, twenty twenty one.

   Denise

   3:27P eighty three is P D D twenty one zero four nine nine. It's also a comprehensive plan actually it is a mobility fee um amendment to the land development code. Uh this is a request to continue to the September 28th, 2021 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 130 in New Port Richey.

   Moore

   3:44Second.

   OakleyChair

   3:44I got a motion of second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Motion pass five zero. P eighty four.

4. 4Sep 15, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP102Public hearingNo action

   Approved minutes

   No action was required as this was the first reading of the proposed Ordinance. The second reading was scheduled for September 28, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 5:17
   ▶ 5:173m

   OakleyChair

   5:17Move on to P 102.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   5:21Item P102 was published in the Tampe Times on July 18, 2021.

   Denise

   5:26P102 is PDD 210499. This one is uh no action is required by the board today. We're just asking that you accept public comment. This is set for adoption on September 28, 2021, at 130 in Port Ritchie. It's an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Section 1302.2, mobility fees to increase the mobility fees for various euses, to decrease the mobility fees for certain local. Own small businesses to amend the mobility fee regulations to be consistent with Chapter 2021-63 laws

   5:56of Florida and other amendments as necessary to ensure internal consistency, providing for applicability, repealer, severability, inclusion to the Pasco County Land Development Code and an effective date.

   OakleyChair

   6:08Okay.

   6:15Mr. Peters.

   OakleyChair

   6:16Thank you, Mr. Chairman Mariano Planning Development Department. Um so as you know we've been working on Mobility P updates for the last two months. On the overhead we'll see um the summary of all the changes that are going to be happening or not happening uh in the Mobility P ordinance. So we're going to continue existing zero fee incentives for office industrial lodging and uh in West market area. Um most retail fees will increase thirteen percent plus or minus uh every

   6:46year. Um fi it'll be fifty percent after about four years due to the cost increases and partial full subsidy removal that's taking place. In addition, um The subsidies for multi-family were removed in 2020. And so those fees will see increases by 14% in the urban areas to 24% in the rural areas over four years due to those cost increases. We've developed a locally owned small business definition, then we can get to in

   7:16subsequent slides if there's a desire. Um however the locally owned small business fees will be reduced uh to the same rate as the traditional design rate that currently was the C D rate that's currently the proposal. That's 50%, less than 50% of the standard fees. Um the proposed update also improves the continuation of zero subsidies for many housing and mining so they don't have so it'll be a hundred percent fee for

   7:46those. And then all other fees will be indexed at three percent plus or minus annually to address the cost of infrastructure and cost increases that are taking place. And that that amounts to about a 15% increase after four years.

   OakleyChair

   8:03Okay. Is anyone signed up to speak to the sign?

   StarkeyVice Chair

   8:08No one signed up on WebEx and no one signed up in the audience for this.

   OakleyChair

   8:12Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item? See another one?

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   8:20Well you yeah, just announce if you will announce the

   Denise

   8:26Again, so no action is required on this item. This did go to the local planning agency on um seven on seven twenty-two of twenty-one and it went to the horizontal round table. It was presented to them. It's set for adoption on September 28, 2021 at 130 in Newport Ritchie.

5. 5Sep 28, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP72Public hearingAdopted

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 9:29
   ▶ 9:292m

   StarkeyVice Chair

   9:29Item P seventy two was published in the Tampa Bay Times on July eighteenth, twenty twenty one.

   Denise

   9:34Item P72 is an actual adoption. So we're asking that you adopt it by roll call vote. I'll read the ordinance title into record. PDD 210499. This is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Section 1302.2 mobility fees to increase the mobility fees for various uses, to decrease the mobility fees for certain locally owned small businesses, to amend the mobility fee. Regulations to be consistent with Chapter 2021, 63 Laws of Florida, and other amendments as necessary to ensure

   10:04internal consistency, providing for applicability, repealer, severability, inclusion in the Pasco County Land Development Code, an effective date. This went to the horizontal round table interested parties meeting on July 21st. It went to the local planning agency who found it consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommended approval to the Board of County Commissioners. On July 22nd, and it was uh um introduced at first reading on 915-21 to the Board of County Commissioners. Again today the is the adoption, so we ask that you adopt the ordinance by roll call

   10:34vote.

   OakleyChair

   10:35Okay. Uh is anyone here in the audience? Is anyone signed up?

   StarkeyVice Chair

   10:40No one signed up in person and no one on WebEx.

   OakleyChair

   10:42Okay. Anyone in the room wish to speak to this item? Seeing no one? Major.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   10:49Second.

   OakleyChair

   10:51Okay, I got a motion and a second by roll call vote.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   10:53District two, Commissioner Moore.

   OakleyChair

   10:56Aye.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   10:56District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.

   OakleyChair

   11:03Aye.

   StarkeyVice Chair

   11:03District one, Chairman Oakley.

   OakleyChair

   11:05Aye. Motion pass five zero.

   11:10P seventy three.