Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P56ContinuedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Cranes Roost, PVAS No. 3346 (Regular) — Board of County Commissioners — Board Initiated Public Hearing — $636,785.00

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PW-21-0022District 4

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

Approved minutes

DispositionContinued

Approved to continue the item to the April 20, 2021 BCC Meeting in New Port Richey at 1:30 p.m. by a roll call vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 23, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 23, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PW-21-0022 in full →

PW-21-0022 was taken up 2 times between Mar 23, 2021 and Apr 20, 2021, continued 1 time — this is appearance 1.

  1. Mar 23, 2021BoardP56Continuedthis item
  2. Apr 20, 2021BoardP60Approved

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 77% of 30 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
OakleyChair

Fifty six. P fifty six.

StarkeyVice Chair

Item P fifty six was published in the Tampe Times on March third, twenty twenty one.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

This is item number PWF 21-0022 Crane's roofs, PVS number 3346. This is one of the 2015-16 storm damage road projects. It was temporarily repaired in 2017 and the temporal repair was um chip sealing. This is a board-initiated uh PVAS project. Uh there are six roads included in this PVAS project. Twelve of them were not actually chip sealed,

but I'll explain in a minute um why they were included in the project. Uh there are 82 lots and um 81 ERUs. Yeah. Um in terms of the estimated cost of the project it's six hundred and uh thirty-seven thousand dollars approximately, maximum cost for ERU is seven thousand eight hundred dollars and sixty eight on seven thousand eight hundred and sixty-one dollars. Um The discount of the amount is $139,000 approximately, and the maximum cost for EIU after the discount

is $6,114.16. The repayment is over a 10-year period, and the interest rate is 3.25% interest. One of the things I'd like to note is that

Planters Lane and Trasher Court. It's the extreme uh uh section that goes uh south and forms like an L. Those were not chip sealed, but um in looking at the condition of the road, and I'll show a picture in a minute. Um looking at the condition of the road, the Azure Road, the the um The patch, the linear patch, the potable patch, it was recommended that this be included in the project. If we did not include these two roads in the project because

of the PVAS methodology and policy guidelines, they would be included in the assessment at 25%, but they would not have those roads paid. So we um were proposing that these two would be included, although the directive is um you know one of the roads that were chip seal

Um this is um Planters Lane. So you see the conditioner of road and ice. There it is again also on Trasher Court and Planters Lane and the asphalt, the pavement is um less than a half an inch. Um Any comments, questions?

StarkeyVice Chair

Um well I assume where's is there any public comment for this?

OakleyChair

Well we got weight so 'cause

StarkeyVice Chair

I'll make mine after.

OakleyChair

Do we have any

StarkeyVice Chair

I think we do.

OakleyChair

Anyone on the

Mariano

Mr. Chairman?

OakleyChair

Yes.

Mariano

Jack Mariano. Um just to before we get into the public comment, because I did hear from a lot of the public. Um with the eighty one units ERUs that are here. Um I think everybody got a copy. There was sixty eight signatures, individuals, eleven uh husband and wife, seventy-nine total signals, saying they have the project. I I've never seen a project like this uh was such a determination for the people not to have it done. I s I strongly recommend before we get into all the public comment, uh

Commissioner Fitzpatrick, it might be good for you, because Ainsy, I think you just gave new information which I didn't hear before. That you might want to just continue this, have a public meeting. And listen to what the people have to say. Otherwise we're gonna listen to the light on the right-of-way. feedback like seventy nine out of eighty one say they don't want it the way it was

Fitzpatrick

I was gonna say, Commissioner Mariano, I've actually been out there, I've driven the roads, I've met with um citizens, and I've also spoken to staff already. I was gonna ask for a continuance with this one as well until April 20th, because they have mentioned two other roads that may need to be included into the PVAS, and then if we were possibly looking at alternatives, if two of the roads that were not changed.

Moore

I'll second. That was a con motion, right? I guess I'm not going to be able

Fitzpatrick

to

Moore

read

OakleyChair

a win.

Fitzpatrick

April twentieth. Mm. Okay.

OakleyChair

My roll call book. We don't have to take any other comment to continue, right?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

These are not quasi judicial items, so I'm not so as concerned with Okay.

StarkeyVice Chair

District two, Commissioner Oakley. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.

OakleyChair

Okay.

StarkeyVice Chair

District One, Chairman Oakley.

OakleyChair

Motion pass five zero for continuance. Okay, move on to P fifty seven.