Cranes Roost, PVAS No. 3346 (Regular) — Board of County Commissioners — Board Initiated Public Hearing — $636,785.00
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionContinued
Approved to continue the item to the April 20, 2021 BCC Meeting in New Port Richey at 1:30 p.m. by a roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 23, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 23, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PW-21-0022 in full →PW-21-0022 was taken up 2 times between Mar 23, 2021 and Apr 20, 2021, continued 1 time — this is appearance 1.
- Mar 23, 2021BoardP56▶Continuedthis item
- Apr 20, 2021BoardP60▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 77% of 30 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Fifty six. P fifty six.
Item P fifty six was published in the Tampe Times on March third, twenty twenty one.
This is item number PWF 21-0022 Crane's roofs, PVS number 3346. This is one of the 2015-16 storm damage road projects. It was temporarily repaired in 2017 and the temporal repair was um chip sealing. This is a board-initiated uh PVAS project. Uh there are six roads included in this PVAS project. Twelve of them were not actually chip sealed,
but I'll explain in a minute um why they were included in the project. Uh there are 82 lots and um 81 ERUs. Yeah. Um in terms of the estimated cost of the project it's six hundred and uh thirty-seven thousand dollars approximately, maximum cost for ERU is seven thousand eight hundred dollars and sixty eight on seven thousand eight hundred and sixty-one dollars. Um The discount of the amount is $139,000 approximately, and the maximum cost for EIU after the discount
is $6,114.16. The repayment is over a 10-year period, and the interest rate is 3.25% interest. One of the things I'd like to note is that
Planters Lane and Trasher Court. It's the extreme uh uh section that goes uh south and forms like an L. Those were not chip sealed, but um in looking at the condition of the road, and I'll show a picture in a minute. Um looking at the condition of the road, the Azure Road, the the um The patch, the linear patch, the potable patch, it was recommended that this be included in the project. If we did not include these two roads in the project because
of the PVAS methodology and policy guidelines, they would be included in the assessment at 25%, but they would not have those roads paid. So we um were proposing that these two would be included, although the directive is um you know one of the roads that were chip seal
Um this is um Planters Lane. So you see the conditioner of road and ice. There it is again also on Trasher Court and Planters Lane and the asphalt, the pavement is um less than a half an inch. Um Any comments, questions?
Um well I assume where's is there any public comment for this?
Well we got weight so 'cause
I'll make mine after.
Do we have any
I think we do.
Anyone on the
Mr. Chairman?
Yes.
Jack Mariano. Um just to before we get into the public comment, because I did hear from a lot of the public. Um with the eighty one units ERUs that are here. Um I think everybody got a copy. There was sixty eight signatures, individuals, eleven uh husband and wife, seventy-nine total signals, saying they have the project. I I've never seen a project like this uh was such a determination for the people not to have it done. I s I strongly recommend before we get into all the public comment, uh
Commissioner Fitzpatrick, it might be good for you, because Ainsy, I think you just gave new information which I didn't hear before. That you might want to just continue this, have a public meeting. And listen to what the people have to say. Otherwise we're gonna listen to the light on the right-of-way. feedback like seventy nine out of eighty one say they don't want it the way it was
I was gonna say, Commissioner Mariano, I've actually been out there, I've driven the roads, I've met with um citizens, and I've also spoken to staff already. I was gonna ask for a continuance with this one as well until April 20th, because they have mentioned two other roads that may need to be included into the PVAS, and then if we were possibly looking at alternatives, if two of the roads that were not changed.
I'll second. That was a con motion, right? I guess I'm not going to be able
to
read
a win.
April twentieth. Mm. Okay.
My roll call book. We don't have to take any other comment to continue, right?
These are not quasi judicial items, so I'm not so as concerned with Okay.
District two, Commissioner Oakley. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Okay.
District One, Chairman Oakley.
Motion pass five zero for continuance. Okay, move on to P fifty seven.